<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: obmelvin</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=obmelvin</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 17 Apr 2026 14:07:21 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=obmelvin" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by obmelvin in "Show HN: Claudraband – Claude Code for the Power User"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It isn't ones duty to develop for everybody. If someone makes something for their own use case and shares it, that's fine.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 19:57:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743785</link><dc:creator>obmelvin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743785</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47743785</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by obmelvin in "Claude Sonnet 4.6"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I believe they just mean setting the model back to 4.5</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 08:45:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47058769</link><dc:creator>obmelvin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47058769</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47058769</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by obmelvin in "Apple introduces new AirTag with longer range and improved findability"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>And people have economic issues in Asia, Australia, Europe, North America and South America.<p>People of all ethnicities all over the world steal. Plenty of immigrants work extremely hard and don't steal.<p>I truly can't believe my statement was 'controversial' and down vote worthy. I mean who cares about the HN points...but really??</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2026 16:36:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46782301</link><dc:creator>obmelvin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46782301</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46782301</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by obmelvin in "Apple introduces new AirTag with longer range and improved findability"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>People steal due to economic issues, not their ethnicity.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2026 23:06:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46772975</link><dc:creator>obmelvin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46772975</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46772975</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by obmelvin in "Getting a Gemini API key is an exercise in frustration"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I could've made my comment more clear. Definitely missing a statement along the lines of "and then after creating, you click 'set up billing' and link the accounts in 15 seconds"<p>I did edit my message to mention I had GCP billing set up already. I'm guessing that's one of the differences between those having trouble and those not.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2025 18:45:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46235301</link><dc:creator>obmelvin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46235301</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46235301</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by obmelvin in "Getting a Gemini API key is an exercise in frustration"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don't understand the multiple posts / comments I've seen about this.<p>I google `gemini API key` and the first result* is this docs page: <a href="https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/api-key" rel="nofollow">https://ai.google.dev/gemini-api/docs/api-key</a><p>That docs page has a link in the first primary section on the page. Sure, it could be a huge CTA, but this is a docs page, so it's kinda nice that it's not gone through a marketing make over.<p>* besides sponsored result for AI Studio<p>(Maybe I misunderstood and all the complaints are about billing. I don't remember having issues when I added my card to GCP in the past, but maybe I did)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 10 Dec 2025 23:10:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46225337</link><dc:creator>obmelvin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46225337</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46225337</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by obmelvin in "The Framework Desktop is a beast"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>During peak hours (4-9pm daily) in San Diego you can be paying nearly $1/kWh (generation + transmission cost) to SDGE, so at least in certain areas, the running cost is very much relevant even for consumers.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2025 00:16:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44859639</link><dc:creator>obmelvin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44859639</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44859639</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by obmelvin in "OpenAI says it has evidence DeepSeek used its model to train competitor"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Agreed. They accomplished a lot with distillation and optimization - but there's little reason to believe you don't also need foundational models to keep advancing. Otherwise won't they run into issues training on more synthetic data?<p>In a way this is something most companies have been doing with their smaller models, DeepSeek just supposedly* did it better.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Jan 2025 22:29:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42872110</link><dc:creator>obmelvin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42872110</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42872110</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by obmelvin in "Mysterious New Jersey drone sightings prompt call for 'state of emergency'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You're arguing with me about points I haven't made.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 21:42:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42435778</link><dc:creator>obmelvin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42435778</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42435778</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by obmelvin in "Mysterious New Jersey drone sightings prompt call for 'state of emergency'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I haven't made any claims about the recent sightings. Some have clearly been planes and people are just looking up more.<p>My original point was and is that there are many laws restricting what the military is able to do domestically.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 16 Dec 2024 17:08:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42432954</link><dc:creator>obmelvin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42432954</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42432954</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by obmelvin in "Mysterious New Jersey drone sightings prompt call for 'state of emergency'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>1) there was a very public delay to shoot down anything even remotely above people. They just aren’t going to shoot something down over a city<p>From the WSJ article I mentioned:
“ Federal law prohibits the military from shooting down drones near military bases in the U.S. unless they pose an imminent threat. Aerial snooping doesn’t qualify, though some lawmakers hope to give the military greater leeway”<p>2) as you probably know, the pilot doesn’t really guide the missile…calling the pilot an idiot just clearly shows you have an axe to grind. Also, it’s not like the seekers are calibrated to take out balloons.<p>3) regarding EW - the tech is obviously still evolving and not always deployed
“ U.S. officials said they didn’t know who operated the drones in Nevada, a previously unreported incursion, or for what reason. A spokeswoman said the facility has since upgraded a system to detect and counter drones.”<p>Also, it is certainly possible to harden drones against EW as is being done in Ukraine on an evolving basis</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 23:53:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42404641</link><dc:creator>obmelvin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42404641</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42404641</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by obmelvin in "Mysterious New Jersey drone sightings prompt call for 'state of emergency'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The military isn’t allowed to shoot down drones in the US. There was a WSJ story last month about drones flying over Langley for 2 weeks. All the general could do is stand on the roof and watch</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 01:41:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42395244</link><dc:creator>obmelvin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42395244</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42395244</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by obmelvin in "Forced to upgrade"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Fair :) I was overlooking that this latest computer could be an older intel machine that didn't receive the latest OS, thus won't still still have years of security only updates.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Dec 2024 20:41:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42321815</link><dc:creator>obmelvin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42321815</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42321815</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by obmelvin in "Forced to upgrade"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Why can't your dad keep using his existing computer? Sure, if you make your living on the computer the new laptops are great. But if he's just checking email, photos, etc - I don't know why his computer needs to become a paperweight</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 19:12:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42299346</link><dc:creator>obmelvin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42299346</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42299346</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by obmelvin in "Forced to upgrade"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Apple had good reasons for both transitions. In the scheme of 'forced upgrades' these are about as good as you're going to get. Also, if the OPs dad is using the computer for so little that it would last another 30 years, they certainly have no need to upgrade computers. No reason one can't keep using an intel iMac to browse the web</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 02 Dec 2024 19:10:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42299324</link><dc:creator>obmelvin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42299324</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42299324</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by obmelvin in "LLMs don't do formal reasoning"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, I'm not claiming that is true formal reasoning, but it is certainly more of a chain of thought than was previously being done and does indicate that some questions require more and less "thought"</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2024 20:13:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41813240</link><dc:creator>obmelvin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41813240</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41813240</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by obmelvin in "LLMs don't do formal reasoning"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>the o1 model definitely has a somewhat big variance in how long the task takes depending on what you ask it to do</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Oct 2024 19:47:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41812935</link><dc:creator>obmelvin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41812935</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41812935</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by obmelvin in "Timeshare owner? The Mexican drug cartels want you"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>For anyone curious to hear more about how this happens, and a discussion with someone who was a former police officer (maybe even detective?) yet still fell victim, The Daily did an episode on this in April as well<p>In general, I've seen lots of 'victim blaming' with these sorts of scams. I mean, I do understand that it's easy to sit there and think 'I understand sending money the first time, but how do you still fall for it the 6th time they ask you to send more money?'. But I think it's important to remember that victims are often older or new to the country*. These scams are designed and refined to make you feel trapped.<p>* I'm aware the OP involves a Canadian couple and the NYT story involves an American couple. I don't think the direct country matters. Most of these scams are all about scaring and isolating someone.<p>NYT link - <a href="https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/12/podcasts/the-daily/scam-cartel-timeshare.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.nytimes.com/2024/04/12/podcasts/the-daily/scam-c...</a><p>YT link - <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3biituRAiVg" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3biituRAiVg</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 25 Sep 2024 17:15:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41649611</link><dc:creator>obmelvin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41649611</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41649611</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by obmelvin in "Learning to Reason with LLMs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The linked release mentions trusted users and links to the usage tier limits. Looking at the pricing, o1-preview only appears for tier 5 - requiring 1k+ spend and initial spend 30+ days ago<p>edit: sorry - this is for API :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Sep 2024 22:10:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41526166</link><dc:creator>obmelvin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41526166</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41526166</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by obmelvin in "Ilya Sutskever's SSI Inc raises $1B"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I suppose my phrasing was a bit harsh at the end. To be clear, I mean that it doesn't mean they know what they are doing on <i>every</i> investment. Investing misses happen! People are wrong!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Sep 2024 23:29:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41461325</link><dc:creator>obmelvin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41461325</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=41461325</guid></item></channel></rss>