<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: oliculipolicula</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=oliculipolicula</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 16:22:30 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=oliculipolicula" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by oliculipolicula in "Y Combinator's Stake in OpenAI (0.6%?)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>We're forced to decide whether 0.8B is enough to risk her credibility over, or, if it matters to us, gather more information first</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 05:38:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48018487</link><dc:creator>oliculipolicula</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48018487</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48018487</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by oliculipolicula in "Y Combinator's Stake in OpenAI (0.6%?)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Despite not publicly moving away from what has been said about Sam*<p>Jessica Livingston's personal stake in OpenAI is maybe at most 0.1% or less and Paul Graham's, afaik, is 0.<p>So the bias doesn't seem as large as OP thinks<p>*<a href="https://xcancel.com/paulg/status/2041366050693173393" rel="nofollow">https://xcancel.com/paulg/status/2041366050693173393</a><p>And "toughness, adaptability, and determination" 
>>> "ambition", frankly</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 03:08:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48017638</link><dc:creator>oliculipolicula</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48017638</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48017638</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by oliculipolicula in "Notes on the Vulnerable World Hypothesis"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Allow me to A&Q:<p>A: while world3 has be shown to be quite descriptive, the centre right (Nielsen) won't be persuaded, they need market-based narratives that (pre)scribe themselves.<p>In TFA, Nielsen signalled that he was open to "left-curious" ideas  from 2023 Buterin.<p>Left-curious in the sense that the d in d/acc means both "defensive" and "decentralized"; one then squints and sees restraint/redistribution..<p>Q: Yet, solar-first power markets as a harbinger of d/acc don't move the centre-right one millimetre to the left. Why is this so? What would an "solar economy rebrand" of AGI (or ASI) that gets buy-in from the (centre-)right look like?<p>(It's not that I don't think programmers need to be sold on d/acc.. ngl, I believe convincing the centre-right is easier than it sounds, given the rep-damage that crypto has taken in the worldviews of non-libertarians<p><a href="https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=pastMonth&page=0&prefix=true&query=Stablecoin&sort=byDate&type=comment" rel="nofollow">https://hn.algolia.com/?dateRange=pastMonth&page=0&prefix=tr...</a>
)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 19:47:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48000674</link><dc:creator>oliculipolicula</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48000674</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48000674</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by oliculipolicula in "Should other living systems have agentic reprsentation?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I "hedge against myself" too if this is what I think it is. But your backstory stub already sounds more systematic-specific than what I have.<p>While in the shower I came up with the following refinement:<p>Stochastic hubris=best preemptive defence against the gods<p>(And then what does Kelly say ;)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 16:24:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47998552</link><dc:creator>oliculipolicula</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47998552</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47998552</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by oliculipolicula in "The Claude Delusion: Richard Dawkins believes his AI chatbot is conscious"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Ah sorry, I was being too general , referring to "what might help the average person" and not "myself, with a small probability of helping you, who seem to think we are not as alike as I think we are"..<p>Your way sounds like what my friends call "symbol pushing": writing programs, not worrying about the compiler, or whether the program is "worth" writing in the first place.<p>But you sound like a person who likes to think deeply about what kinds of programs are worth writing. (Or else why care about AI in the first place? AI is the end of carefree programming? )</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 15:59:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47998265</link><dc:creator>oliculipolicula</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47998265</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47998265</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by oliculipolicula in "Amazon says restoring damaged Middle East cloud operations to take months"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Do you care to understand?<p>What I'd like to understand is whether your President (& his advisers) understands why Iran had to be attacked.<p>That will inform his decision on which actions he will take to "help open up the Strait" in the short term. These decisions will then inform us somewhat of his long term strategy for Korea, if he has any.<p>Does he think that ~5000 troops are truly required to be good neighbours? Does he think LNG is critical to the long term industrial policy? Then you'd know which factories to apply to (defence, definitely, but details matter too, like, are you a man of peace? :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 15:30:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47997932</link><dc:creator>oliculipolicula</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47997932</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47997932</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by oliculipolicula in "The Claude Delusion: Richard Dawkins believes his AI chatbot is conscious"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>As an over-educated person who still struggles to think for himself through everything from scratch, the above nevertheless sounds like Descartes'<p><i>dubito, ergo sum</i><p>From this, I can go in practical (ie, separable from free will & other ontological considerations) directions, like:<p>insofar as organised religion does not equate existence with faith, maybe its most important use is to overcome the fear of death.<p>That's cool enough for me, but maybe there are other less "brainwashy", "respectful to the free will[0]" ways to overcome fear of meaninglessness/death/lack of validation from the world, plus all the anguish that these preceding emotional distractions entail?<p>[0] we do not have to admit the existence of free will in order to respect it? Thus can we substitute God with Free Will everywhere but  retain the practical benefits of respecting free will without the ontological difficulties with the precise nature of God?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 14:57:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47997570</link><dc:creator>oliculipolicula</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47997570</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47997570</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by oliculipolicula in "Should other living systems have agentic reprsentation?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Right, right. I remain somewhat unsure of whether "evil twin" indicated anticorrelation (not "value-judgement" :)<p>>"his host would believe"<p>I spy a 2-month-old Sz host who thinks like me and acts like "you":<p><a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47952359">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47952359</a><p>><i>I can see fragments of knowledge that he cannot hide</i></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 02 May 2026 02:57:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47982887</link><dc:creator>oliculipolicula</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47982887</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47982887</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by oliculipolicula in "Fruit flies unexpectedly survived hypergravity and even reproduced"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Hi, as a fellow anti-geronto-corporatist, I noticed your interesting behaviour.<p>(>500 points in a couple(?) posts, presumably highlypaid hardware hacker to freelance software)<p>Principal-agent problem is supposed to be a 2-body problem but most interesting social problems are at least 3-agent problems<p>From your post on cosmetic KPIs,
I sensed some Taoist Duality; so lemme highlight this other hint of Trinity:<p>><i>face is no longer the surface</i><p>face is natural and powerful medium for communication. Any connection  to worldly things --- wealth or even suffering --- can only damage its efficacy.<p>Beyond duality of "overstated agency of rich" and "understated wisdom of not-super-poor" there exists a 3rd way:<p><pre><code>  Universal freedom through mastery of communicative facial rationality.
</code></pre>
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communicative_rationality" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communicative_rationality</a><p>I also replied to your posts here, here and here, as thoughtfully as I could<p><a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47970648">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47970648</a><p><a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47970518">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47970518</a><p>(was ghostbanned, so I had to use a new acct)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2026 13:24:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47974550</link><dc:creator>oliculipolicula</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47974550</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47974550</guid></item></channel></rss>