<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: ololobus</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=ololobus</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2026 13:20:18 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=ololobus" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ololobus in "There are no "rogue" AI agents"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don’t get it. One day they tell us that AI is the most dangerous and the most advanced tech the humanity ever invented. Now we consider an environment with just a package proxy between it and the outer network a good enough effort to sandbox. I do see some contradictions. Considering they also effectively test next-gen models there, I think the only proper sandbox would be a physically separated network. You need packages, well, bring them with USB stick</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 27 Sep 2026 20:06:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49870318</link><dc:creator>ololobus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49870318</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49870318</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ololobus in "EU chief opens door for Canada to become 'associate member'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think you miss the symmetry part. You like NATO, OK, that’s good. But will you be equally happy if China will fund PTO (Pacific Treaty Organization, no pun intended) and Mexico, Cuba, Algeria, Egypt, Brazil, etc., will absolutely voluntarily join it?<p>This can work if one country/alliance is doing it, but when everyone starts doing the same it becomes a zero sum game with the dead end. It’s pretty much the prisoner’s dilemma: “if we don’t expand, they will expand/invade” although it’s a common interest to not escalate</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 16:19:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49729320</link><dc:creator>ololobus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49729320</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49729320</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ololobus in "EU chief opens door for Canada to become 'associate member'"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have no idea how we do it, but I think we should somehow ban the expansion of all the existing unions (EU, CIS, NATO, whatever else we got). The overall worldwide tension is pretty high, but now<p>- US goes after South America and Greenland<p>- EU goes after Canada and Georgia (country), which is just ridiculous in terms of geography<p>- Russia invades Ukraine and goes after Eastern Europe and Middle-East to some extent<p>- China does its expansion too<p>Even though some of these actions are just political nonsense, it still increases the overall level of escalation. This is not what the world needs right now<p>Trade agreements and unions — yes, please; yet another political or military union expansion — please, God, no. I understand that EU is a mix of both, but also do think that this is a purely political game against Trump</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 12:21:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49725825</link><dc:creator>ololobus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49725825</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49725825</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ololobus in "216M Spy TVs – The LG Smart TV Problem [video]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Same, disabled internet access on my LG years ago using the router config. It’s good that it at least doesn’t stop working without internet</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 19:46:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49602205</link><dc:creator>ololobus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49602205</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49602205</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ololobus in "Tiny $70 Xteink X3 e-reader"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I got X3 because it was on the ads all over my internet. My idea was that I can stick it to my phone when I go out or commute and don’t want to bring my standard Kobo reader, so I can read more instead of doomscrolling<p>So far, my impression:<p>- it’s a fun piece of tech, but it’s also a super simple one. Idk the price of a eink screen like that, but it’s basically a screen + esp32 + battery, so $70 might be a bit too much, and just includes all the ads budget, which is clearly huge<p>- CrossPoint firmware is neat and OSS, so you can for and DIY whatever you can imagine<p>- it’s still so much more convenient to read on a bit bigger reader. Even my Kobo Clara BW with Koreader, which is still quite portable, has way better UX. And it’s just about x2 more expensive<p>- magnet is not strong enough to sit firmly on my phone<p>- I got a epub rendering issue with one of my books<p>- I don’t read a lot on it and still prefer my Kobo, so it failed the main objective for me personally<p>- it’s still fun how much esp32 in such a tiny enclosure can do :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 17:57:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49601055</link><dc:creator>ololobus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49601055</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49601055</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ololobus in "Apple caught off guard by AI demand for Mac Mini and Mac Studio"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I was looking at $10k Mac Studio with M5 Ultra and 256 GB for local experiments, but then struggled to find what really good modern model I can fit into it. Yes, it can run a good dense 27B at Q8 with plenty of context, but what beyond that? IIUC, some Deepseek flash variants at Q4 are also feasible, but I am not sure if the quality will be good. They also don’t run that fast, like about 30 t/s<p>So if I stay within 35B, especially MOE, my M5 Pro 64GB MBP can also run them well, and it can do plenty of other stuff too including gaming. While 256 GB with such RAM bandwidth and powerful GPU sounds like fun on paper, it doesn’t seem to be the next level compared to 64 GB<p>Really curious what people run on 256 GB Macs</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 31 Aug 2026 19:48:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49514108</link><dc:creator>ololobus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49514108</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49514108</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ololobus in "Kobo can run apps now"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I haven’t had a chance to compare side by side, but people say that if you primarily read books/prose, the BW version is better because the screen is more crisp compared to the color version, which is still a bit blurry when you read books. That’s why I ordered BW. Did anyone compare these two side by side in real life for simple text?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2026 19:33:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49392860</link><dc:creator>ololobus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49392860</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49392860</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ololobus in "Claude: System Prompts"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, but I write this putting an ‘average AI company CEO’ hat on. We hear statements about outstanding intelligence (not just usefulness as a tool, which is no doubt already there), so it’s interesting to see that the authors themselves don’t treat it like that</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 16:16:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49321371</link><dc:creator>ololobus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49321371</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49321371</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ololobus in "Claude: System Prompts"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’m also curious how it really ’weights’ all the instructions coming from main system prompt, my system prompt, skills/plugins, CLAUDE.ms, and nearby code/comments/readme. It clearly should follow some reasonable hierarchy, but because the model itself is so complex, I think (and it feels like) that there is such a mess in its context and reasoning. It deals with it surprisingly well, though, but wonder if it can be done in a more efficient way</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 16:12:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49321333</link><dc:creator>ololobus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49321333</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49321333</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ololobus in "Claude: System Prompts"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> A prompt implying an image is present doesn't mean one is (the person may have forgotten to upload it), so Claude checks for itself.<p>Interesting that enforcing this via system prompt for such a powerful model like Opus 4.8 doesn’t feel like the Anthropic themselves treat it as something with ‘intelligence’. This is basically just very generic common sense to me<p>Funnily, a similar prompt is present even for Fable 5, while I remember there was a blog post, maybe even from A., and they were saying something like “hey, the new models are so smart, don’t overload them with extra plugin/context”. Well, they clearly aren’t. Don’t want to sound like an AI-skeptic, I use it daily, just stating the fact.<p>> Claude keeps responses focused, brief, and concise to avoid overwhelming the person<p>This is also very interesting. It pretty much ignores it by default. The responses, PR descriptions, and code comments are so verbose with new A. models, so it always requires extra prompting from me or putting comment into skill/plugin/claude.md to make them of a reasonable length</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 16:04:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49321249</link><dc:creator>ololobus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49321249</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49321249</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ololobus in "Firefox is now the last major browser that still supports uBlock Origin"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’m a huge fan of Mozilla and Firefox specifically, but I don’t think that the way classical adblock extensions are made is the right way. Instead, it should be done as Apple/Safari do it [1]: the browser provides an API to hook/set a block list of identifiers that should be blocked, it could be resource hostnames, html signatures, need to think how to improve the API, but this way it’s completely safe, extension has zero access to the actual page content. Apple does the same for caller id apps. Afaik, Android has this API too, but the last time I checked, all relevant extensions were just “give me your whole phone control or web page access”, so Google clearly doesn’t enforce it<p>Yes, it kinda gives more control to the platform, but so far, iOS extensions that use this API worked surprisingly well for me<p>Please, correct me if I am wrong and uBclock can already work in this restricted mode<p>And the last thing, if people really want to give someone a full page content access, they surely should be able to do that, so kudos to Mozilla<p>[1] <a href="https://developer.apple.com/documentation/safariservices/creating-a-content-blocker" rel="nofollow">https://developer.apple.com/documentation/safariservices/cre...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 09:41:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49309148</link><dc:creator>ololobus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49309148</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49309148</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ololobus in "Opinionated and easy Pi.dev configuration"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> The new models are quite smart, so suffocating their context with dozens of MCPs and skills isn’t necessary like it used to be.<p>Genuinely curious, how MCPs can suffocate the context? And what exactly do you mean by this?<p>I have probably more than a dozen of MCPs enabled in my Claude Code (slack, jira, github, many internal ones), and I have never seen model calling into them unnecessarily unless it’s explicitly needed for a task. And in the latter case, well, it cannot do much without the right tools access (MCP in this case).<p>Skills and plugins are a bit of grey zone, yes, but even there it heavily depends on what you put there. Just plugin loading always takes infinitesimal portion of the context in my experience</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 20:49:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48852176</link><dc:creator>ololobus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48852176</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48852176</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ololobus in "EU Parliament greenlights Chat Control 1.0"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Then use a sort of "reverse" parliamentary trick: the default is that this legislation is accepted. They needed an absolute majority - not of voting members, but of all members - to reject it.<p>No pun intended, but how is this legal? I mean, if you don’t have a quorum, then shouldn’t you just wait for an Autumn session? It feels like having a democratic parliament with backdoors like this kinda undermines the whole idea</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 20:04:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48851679</link><dc:creator>ololobus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48851679</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48851679</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ololobus in "Apple raises prices of MacBooks, iPads"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Games are no longer about having fun, they're about how much money or activity can I extract from the player (yes, even the indie experience is tainted: buy off Steam and 30% of that purchase goes to the platform for just existing).<p>This is a HUGE overstatement, tbh. Without such big worldwide distributors like Steam, the only option an average indie dev would have is to distribute their game on their website that nobody knows about, so instead of hundreds of 1000s of sold copies they would have just some 1000s<p>Another non-obvious outcome of Steam is that the pirate scene largely just went away. It so niche that nobody really cares about it for real. It’s just so much easier and safer to buy<p>So I would say that Steam, Apple and so on have earned their 30%, they really created a huge market everyone can get a share in. Surely it should be regulated to avoid hostile monopoly behavior, but that’s a different story</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 09:22:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48696598</link><dc:creator>ololobus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48696598</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48696598</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ololobus in "Apple raises prices of MacBooks, iPads"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> It upsets me I never got to live the "glory days" of cars, technology, outdoor activities, music, entertainment, etc.<p>I’m getting closer to 40, but I sometimes feel the same. Like people were buying houses for a fair amount of money in 90s-00s, when I was going to school. And now it’s like you need a fortune to do the same<p>But generally, I think it’s more about human psychology. For many people, the past may feel more attractive. It’s a mix of nostalgia, current day-to-day problems, and the fact that you cannot really get there to check if it really was that great :)<p>Human history has known much worse times than now, and I think we all need to remember that we shape the present and the future in one way or another. Yes, you and I have way smaller levers than D. Trump or Elon Musk or some average CEO, but we do still have. Every day we make decisions that influence our life and the lives of people around.<p>Don’t want to sound like that social media influencer, it’s just how I explain it to myself too</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 08:25:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48696277</link><dc:creator>ololobus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48696277</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48696277</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ololobus in "Loupe – A iOS app that raises awareness about what native apps can see"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Idk, I actually got the opposite impression. Most of the info is just what I would expect everyone to see: date formats, languages, various webview kind of stuff, network info. This is already more than enough for fingerprinting<p>> information such as apps installed<p>This is what surprised me too, but if you read their hint, it’s not like list API. They probe various ‘open URL in app’ to see what apps registered them, so are installed. I guess this i) won’t allow you to track apps that don’t have ‘open in app’ urls, and ii) probably hard to limit without affecting UX<p>> number of copy actions<p>This is odd, yeah, not sure why is it exposed<p>> last wipe<p>They deduce this from the volume creation date. Probably possible to hide, but also not really that important, at least to me. Fingerprinting will work with way fewer info anyway<p>To summarize, I think iOS is still very solid in terms of involuntary info exposure (if you trust Apple itself). Most of really sensitive info requires separate permissions. Yes, you can harden it further, but that will be more like a paranoid mode</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 15:09:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48619593</link><dc:creator>ololobus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48619593</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48619593</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ololobus in "Ask HN: Has anyone replaced Claude/GPT with a local model for daily coding?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You are right, but I think you miss the whole point of the agentic workflows that are being discussed in this post comments.<p>Yes, you surely can read man, docs, whatever, then DIY. The point is that in many areas people don’t really want to become an expert, like in ffmpeg cli arguments, they just want the work to be done. Above is an example of agent being able to do it locally, and I think it’s great</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 13:22:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48554901</link><dc:creator>ololobus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48554901</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48554901</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ololobus in "OpenAI Is Preparing to File for an IPO Soon"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Just speculating and thinking out loud. I think this might be a good news for AI-skeptics. Going with IPO means that investors finally want to get some cash that they cannot get by any other means. There are good examples of private market companies staying like that for many years because they are profitable, they have plenty of cash, and they have a queue of investors eager to put more cash<p>So what does it mean in this particular case? The board and investors probably don’t see it being realistic to become profitable soon, and maybe even worry about AI ceiling, so they want to profit now</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 16:21:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48225273</link><dc:creator>ololobus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48225273</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48225273</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ololobus in "Flipper One – we need your help"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Idk, with the One they already seem to try to claim too many things for a single device. Adding a keyboard and a bigger screen will be even bigger scope creep. As a Zero user, I really like the compact form-factor<p>And just personal imo, for coding on the go something like macbook air seems to be a way more comfortable option. I know that you wrote that you fit gpd in you pants, but man, you know that this use case is even more niche than flipper zero</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 16:12:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48225123</link><dc:creator>ololobus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48225123</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48225123</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by ololobus in "Germany goes from labour shortages to hiring freezes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The job market all over the world is ultimately changing. Wars, AI, energy crisis, etc. — it’s a combination of factors. Yet, the article is too shallow, so it doesn’t clarify much.<p>The two examples are not really representative, “press spokesman at a small industry association” and entry-level “apprenticeship in marketing communications and a bachelor’s degree in international management”. I don’t want to say that they are completely bs jobs but, well, these are quite niche. Both seem to be only ‘affordable’ for a strong economy, not during an economic instability.<p>What I’d like to get answers to is why if everyone says about shortages of nurses, doctors, teachers, plumbers and other handymen, highly qualified engineers capable of making some complex stuff like rockets; I don’t really see any policy makers pushing to make such jobs more appealing, I don’t see people around talking about moving to any of such areas even if they struggle or lose their office/corporate jobs, or talking about their kids learning to do one of them</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 10:56:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48177849</link><dc:creator>ololobus</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48177849</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48177849</guid></item></channel></rss>