is that an issue? the tiny model might not surface something important

I don't want to have the freedom to go places determined by some faceless multinational, according to my subscription. Or via some "safety" regime.

For a more ecologically conscious alternative, I recommend carrying a handful of sparkplugs.

AI's capacity for memorisation is unrivaled, I find it mind blowing that you can download a tiny ~4gb model and it will have vastly more general knowledge than an average human (considering that the human is more likely to be wrong if you ask it trivia about e.g. the spanish civil war).

But the average human still has actual reasoning capabilities, which is still (I think?) a debated point with AI.

You've almost certainly got more experts-exchange.com than github.com

This way, they can avoid being legally blamed for stuff-ups and instead scapegoat some hapless employee :-) using cryptographic evidence the employee "authorized" whatever action was taken

It's never easy for a bunch of people, each with differing and partially-overlapping conceptualisations of some domain, to coordinate correctly.

The human problems don't really go away. It requires an insane amount of "context" that would overwhelm any current AI.

I wage a constant battle of motivating myself because my neurology craves novel sources of dopamine but my job is doing the needful 90% of the time.

hopefully this leads to greater importance of seeing things with your own wetware.

I'm rooting for biological cognitive enhancement through gene editing or whatever other crazy shit. I do not want to have some corporation's AI chip in my brain.