<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: opscure</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=opscure</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 22:58:26 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=opscure" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by opscure in "The glass backbone: Why the Army's logistics will break in the next war"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I often think about how culture impacts efficacy. Hindering individuals through reconditioning of a hierarchical top down structure (follow orders unconditionally) limits collaboration, cohesion, and creativity often in situations where it's needed most. I understand the advantages of rapid decision making, but I often think about how if any leader in the chain makes a poor decision it loses the trust of those below. Tactical, creative, non-conforming, and adaptive reduces single points of responsibility and failure. While this might exist in pockets, it's far from the norm in most traditional environments and I'm curious what a culture shift like this might yield at a wider scale.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 05:16:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48868983</link><dc:creator>opscure</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48868983</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48868983</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by opscure in "Reading Is a System"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Going through this was painful, but in the spirit of refining research here's a very opinionated reaction. The intention is not to offend, but to provide a differing opinion and hopefully lead to a moment of critical thinking.<p>Fragmenting interest into non correlating segments doesn't really do much in the way of improving comprehension. There are the pedagogical approaches (audio, visual, and tactile) to learning all of which rely on interest in a particular subject. Forcing a fragmented approach to try to generate interest with a pseudoscience approach will have about the same level of adoption of just demanding someone should like a thing without an emotional consideration.<p>Reading something you don't want to is going to stifle retention regardless of how you try and quantify it. Looking into human psychology regarding persuasion might serve as a more novel approach to reading comprehension.<p>For example, creating a relatable narrative prior to the reading might yield both a high level of retention and enjoyment. Pure conjecture, but might make a hypothesis worth exploring rather than a dictation of a process/procedure without a foundation.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 04:34:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48499962</link><dc:creator>opscure</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48499962</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48499962</guid></item></channel></rss>