<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: optiot</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=optiot</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 01:51:26 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=optiot" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by optiot in "AI just got its toughest math test yet. The results are mixed"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><a href="https://archive.is/4M398" rel="nofollow">https://archive.is/4M398</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2026 16:19:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47015699</link><dc:creator>optiot</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47015699</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47015699</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[AI just got its toughest math test yet. The results are mixed]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/first-proof-is-ais-toughest-math-test-yet-the-results-are-mixed/">https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/first-proof-is-ais-toughest-math-test-yet-the-results-are-mixed/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47015695">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47015695</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 2</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 14 Feb 2026 16:19:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.scientificamerican.com/article/first-proof-is-ais-toughest-math-test-yet-the-results-are-mixed/</link><dc:creator>optiot</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47015695</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47015695</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by optiot in "Calculating the Bounding Rectangle of a Circular Sector"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Oh cool! I was working on something similar (but not the same) a couple years back when trying to figure out the bounding box of an arc along the circumference of a circular watch face: <a href="https://www.desmos.com/calculator/4e5c41c2ab" rel="nofollow">https://www.desmos.com/calculator/4e5c41c2ab</a><p>I don't remember exactly what I was doing but I think you might also be able to skip the for loop by directly calculating the point on the axis by using mod or floor/ceil.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 20:39:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45706799</link><dc:creator>optiot</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45706799</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45706799</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by optiot in "Friendship Begins at Home"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That 'doing it for a while' part is one reason I don't really like the "only as well as you love yourself" truism. One can absolutely care deeply for others without caring much for themself, at least to start. But to your point, unless you can develop [/an awareness of the] strengths that you bring to a relationship, fears of being a burden, failing, or taking too much will put a steady drain on it.<p>I think the biggest thing that the "self-love prerequisite" idea misses and that the article sort of indirectly gets at is that this feeling of social self-efficacy is something most (all?) people learn through successful relationships with others - sometimes in our upbringing, sometimes not. I don't think it's unnatural at all for others' love of us to outpace our own just a little.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 19 Oct 2025 05:27:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45632213</link><dc:creator>optiot</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45632213</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45632213</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by optiot in "I used to know how to write in Japanese"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Is ワープロ馬鹿 really a term used by native Japanese speakers? As far as I can tell it only really shows up in Japanese->English dictionaries and English forums (see <a href="https://www.google.com/search?q="ワープロ馬鹿"+-a+-the" rel="nofollow">https://www.google.com/search?q="ワープロ馬鹿"+-a+-the</a>).<p>edit: s/word/term</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2025 02:01:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44907835</link><dc:creator>optiot</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44907835</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44907835</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by optiot in "New colors without shooting lasers into your eyes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The color I saw reminded me a lot of the kind I see when I close my eyes after accidentally looking at something too bright. I wonder if they could be related?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 21 Jul 2025 13:46:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44635032</link><dc:creator>optiot</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44635032</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44635032</guid></item></channel></rss>