<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: orc00</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=orc00</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 21:12:19 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=orc00" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by orc00 in "Everything is logarithms"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Charles Petzold's <i>The Lost Art of Logarithms</i> is a great read (still a work in progress).<p><a href="https://www.lostartoflogarithms.com/" rel="nofollow">https://www.lostartoflogarithms.com/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 22 Jun 2026 13:29:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48629864</link><dc:creator>orc00</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48629864</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48629864</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by orc00 in "DeepSeek V4 Pro at 75% off until 31 May"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> the One country that dropped an A-bomb<p>> "only country to use the bomb"<p>I was confused. Two very different statements but I assume they refer to the US who dropped two A-bombs (Hiroshima and Nagasaki) in anger.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 01:00:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48044126</link><dc:creator>orc00</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48044126</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48044126</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by orc00 in "Usenet personality"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I was looking for this and finally found it in the comments.<p>Derek Smart [1] is the indie developer behind the ambitious (and buggy) space sim Battlecruiser 3000AD [2]. He is known for his legendary Usenet presence in the 90s, and engaged in massive, aggressive flamewars with anyone who criticized his game or physics engine. He adopted the "combative game dev" archetype long before social media existed.<p>Now that he has been mentioned, there's a small chance he will drop by.<p>[1] <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derek_Smart" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Derek_Smart</a><p>[2] <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battlecruiser_3000AD" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battlecruiser_3000AD</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jan 2026 20:38:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46816250</link><dc:creator>orc00</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46816250</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46816250</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by orc00 in "When the Dotcom Bubble Burst"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>BobbyBroccoli on YouTube does an absolutely phenomenal job creating documentaries. Related to the dot-com burst would be the story he tells about Nortel.<p>- Part 1: <a href="https://youtu.be/I6xwMIUPHss?si=WXwM92NA8V6vdjYl" rel="nofollow">https://youtu.be/I6xwMIUPHss?si=WXwM92NA8V6vdjYl</a><p>- Part 2: <a href="https://youtu.be/sDdC3-LT7pM?si=aiIDCjHJ0syeZZP4" rel="nofollow">https://youtu.be/sDdC3-LT7pM?si=aiIDCjHJ0syeZZP4</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Mar 2025 14:13:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43388834</link><dc:creator>orc00</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43388834</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43388834</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by orc00 in "Chatbot hinted a kid should kill his parents over screen time limits: lawsuit"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> If you go by the actual years of the legal system to treat your kid as an independent individual, you probably have wrong approach to parenting.<p>Oh I agree 100%. It's a pragmatic view, not the best one. But the laws are what they are for a reason.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 01:37:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42395223</link><dc:creator>orc00</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42395223</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42395223</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by orc00 in "Chatbot hinted a kid should kill his parents over screen time limits: lawsuit"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I would argue that there is a duty as a parent to monitor a child's welfare and that would include accessing a smartphone when deemed necessary.  When a child turns 18, that duty becomes optional. In this case, these disturbing conversations certainly merit attention. I am not judging the totality of the parents history or their additional actions. I am merely focusing on the phone monitoring aspect. Seventeen doesn't automatically grant you rights that sixteen didn't have. However, at 18, they have the right to find a new place to live and support themselves as they see fit.<p>> This also sounds dystopian. At 17 you shouldn't "seek to obtain compliance" from your child. It sounds disrespectful and humiliating, not treating your child as an individual.<p>It is situation dependent. Sometimes immediate compliance is a necessity and the rest of it can be sorted out later. If a child is having conversations about killing their parents, there seems to be an absence of respect already. Compliance, however, can still be obtained.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 01:20:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42395118</link><dc:creator>orc00</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42395118</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42395118</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by orc00 in "Chatbot hinted a kid should kill his parents over screen time limits: lawsuit"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Taking away a phone from a child is far from meaningless. In fact, it is a very effective way of obtaining compliance if done correctly. I am curious about your perspective.<p>Furthermore, it is my opinion that a child should not have a smartphone to begin with. It fulfills no critical need to the welfare of the child.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Dec 2024 01:01:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42395006</link><dc:creator>orc00</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42395006</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42395006</guid></item></channel></rss>