<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: outbackcoder</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=outbackcoder</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 20:09:33 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=outbackcoder" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by outbackcoder in "South Koreans lock themselves up to escape prison of daily life"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Saw the same thing in Japan during my two years there. In Japan this is known as "mizu shobai", literally the "water trade". Business deals in Japan are largely made over drinks and snacks after work. The bars are literally packed to the gills with "salarymen" until well into the night, only to repeat the next day. It's brutal.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 28 Nov 2018 13:55:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18551428</link><dc:creator>outbackcoder</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18551428</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18551428</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by outbackcoder in "A new Venezuelan ID, created with China's ZTE, tracks citizen behavior"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>But I don't want my taxes raised an order of magnitude to pay for everyone else. I believe in equal opportunity, not equal outcome. Not everyone has to be on a level playing field. That is fake and forced, not natural. Even the poorest American (or anyone short of war-torn countries) has the opportunity to better themselves. It may not be easy or the path may include things that at first seem unnatural, but the paths are there.<p>Case in point in America. I know many, many people who served in the military for the sole reason of a college education. It cost them 4-8 years, but they emerged a veteran with veteran hiring preferences, debt-free, have work experience, life experience, and they are all fine. And no, you don't have to end up in a combat role at all. It's completely avoidable by going into the Air Force or Navy in an administrative role. In the rear with the gear, as it were. Military IT training for those with an IT bent is great training and you get to work on some really interesting stuff. You will never see the front lines as an Air Force IT staffer. This is but one path. For those morally opposed to the military, there are other paths like the Peace Corps, WWOOF, etc.<p>Edited to add:<p>From Winston Churchill:<p>"Socialism is a philosophy of failure, the creed of ignorance, and the gospel of envy, its inherent virtue is the equal sharing of misery."<p>"There is nothing government can give you that it hasn't taken from you in the first place."<p>"The main vice of capitalism is the uneven distribution of prosperity. The main vice of socialism is the even distribution of misery."<p>"You don't make the poor richer by making the rich poorer."<p>"We contend that for a nation to try and tax itself into prosperity is like a man standing in a bucket trying to lift himself up by the handle."<p># End Sir Winston Churchill<p>I agree with all his above statements. Even Scandinavia is cutting back on the services they offer because they cannot afford it long term. It's not a panacea. You earn it, you keep it. Full stop. I should not be forced by taxation to fulfill the lives of others. If you are able-bodied, get a job, even if you don't like it. Work your way up the ladder. Don't expect anything from anyone. No one owes you anything other than mutual respect as a human being. Want something? Go earn it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2018 18:45:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18452569</link><dc:creator>outbackcoder</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18452569</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18452569</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by outbackcoder in "IBM acquires Red Hat"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The problem being that forked projects rarely get much traction. Look at Devuan. Only the very hard core Debian fanboys moved over. Sure, it's nice not having systemd, but the project will never have the user base and developer support that its parent project enjoys. Maybe, though, with RH being bought out, people will take a second look. I've always favoured Debian over RH for servers, as the upgrade path is dead simple and almost always works. RH/CentOS is a tough row to hoe in this regard comparitively.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2018 20:21:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18322915</link><dc:creator>outbackcoder</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18322915</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18322915</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by outbackcoder in "IBM acquires Red Hat"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The BSDs are all open source and not tied to anyone. Since operating systems are literally key components of being free, this truly matters. Red Hat had too much of a grip on Linux (kernel), the userland and much more. systemd, while an atrocity on its own, has now become a requirement for certain userland software projects, which is heresy. So much for the tenet of a software program doing one thing well.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2018 20:10:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18322848</link><dc:creator>outbackcoder</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18322848</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18322848</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by outbackcoder in "IBM acquires Red Hat"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Why not consider Open or NetBSD? They can make nice desktops, and OpenBSD is very friendly on laptops. And they are lighter than Fedora and perform much better. And, they use a maximally free license, but this is simply my preference. You may feel different.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2018 20:01:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18322785</link><dc:creator>outbackcoder</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18322785</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18322785</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by outbackcoder in "IBM acquires Red Hat"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is just as well, as I'm moving quite a bit to Net and OpenBSD. I'm tired of the Linux drama (systemd, CoC, balkanised standards, etc.) the broken stuff between distros. The slower changes for BSD development typically means more stable software. And ZFS. Plus, I actually prefer the ICS/BSD license for software in general, as it's maximally free. I've found over the years, that my BSD boxes are far and away more stable than their Linux counterparts. I do devops mostly, so stability and long-term availability are key factors. ext4 is getting long in the tooth and btrfs is nowhere near ZFS in stability or ability or I/O. I've never had a BSD system crash unexpectedly other than bad HW. I cannot say the same for Linux, even RHEL. I feel like a kid again in many ways, because I get to explore all the cool things the BSDs can do again. I'm even moving my Raspberry Pi over to NetBSD in the coming days as a prototype platform to explore BSD embedded possibilities.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2018 19:39:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18322613</link><dc:creator>outbackcoder</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18322613</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18322613</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by outbackcoder in "IBM acquires Red Hat"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is just as well, as I'm moving quite a bit to Net and OpenBSD. I'm tired of the Linux drama (systemd, CoC, balkanised standards, etc.) the broken stuff between distros. The slower changes for BSD development typically means more stable software. And ZFS. Plus, I actually prefer the ICS/BSD license for software in general, as it's maximally free.
I've found over the years, that my BSD boxes are far and away more stable than their Linux counterparts. I do devops mostly, so stability and long-term availability are key factors. ext4 is getting long in the tooth and btrfs is nowhere near ZFS in stability or ability or I/O. I've never had a BSD system crash unexpectedly other than bad HW. I cannot say the same for Linux, even RHEL.
I feel like a kid again in many ways, because I get to explore all the cool things the BSDs can do again. I'm even moving my Raspberry Pi over to NetBSD in the coming days as a prototype platform to explore BSD embedded possibilities.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2018 19:39:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18322602</link><dc:creator>outbackcoder</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18322602</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18322602</guid></item></channel></rss>