So I made mdt. It's light - one binary, one sqlite file - and lets your agent track the changes to a shared file, so that it only reads the diff.

Ping me if I can make it better.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50214296

Points: 1

# Comments: 0

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50000158

Points: 1

# Comments: 1

https://qm.venka.com

It’s small (zip < 7MB) and fast (launches in 300 ms, opens Moby Dick in < 300 ms).

Ping me if you use and something is missing.

It’s my daily note-taking app.

What’s more interesting to me than time-to-first token or latency is the time it takes for the agent to execute, from starts to finish, excluding when it’s waiting on a human.

As a developer, I wager that any gains I get from Podman will be dwarfed by bugs that I’m encountering in the other software I use.

I’m not implying that Podman causes the bugs. I’m saying that I’ll be more likely to be the first person to encounter the bug.

https://qlabs.sh/10x

It’s really cool, I’d love to see it smart.

Wow, Voxtral is amazing. It will be great when someone stitches this up so an LLM starts thinking, researching for you, before you actually finish talking.

Like, create a conversation partner with sub 0.5 second latency. For example, you ask it a multi part questions and, as soon as you finish talking, it gives you the answer to the first part while it looks up the rest of the answer, then stitches it together so that there's no break.

The 2-3 second latency of existing voice chatbots is a non-started for most humans.

Something that balanced empowering participants and protecting their privacy, while also protecting them from financial abuse.

I'd love feedback.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45742648

Points: 1

# Comments: 1

When I buy Apple, I pay a premium price for a premium product.

The ways ads work, is that the ad revenue shows up in the company’s quarterly earnings, and very quickly the company has to increase ad load across every surface to meet earnings expectations. The user experience deteriorates, getting worse each year.

When I buy Apple, it’s based on my expectation that Apple will remain a premium, mostly ad-free experience for the life of the device. When, after my purchase, they make the product worse, like with the recent iOS update that rolled back usability, it destroys a lot of trust.

I will leave the ecosystem.

This is not in Apple’s long term best interests.

When I buy Apple, I pay a premium price for a premium product.

I would rather you simple charge me more for my product.

The ways ads work, is that the ad revenue shows up in the company’s revenue, and very quickly the company has to increase ad load across every surface to meet earnings expectations. The user experience deteriorates, getting worse each year.

When I buy Apple, it’s based on my expectation that Apple will remain a premium, ad-free experience for the life of the device. When, after my purchase, Apple make the product worse, like with the recent iOS update that rolled back usability, it destroys a lot of trust.

I will leave the ecosystem.

This is not in Apple’s long term best interests.

The author’s math considers how mines would be distributed if mines were distributed to the empty squares after reaching that board state.

This is wrong.

This is classic Monty Hall Problem. The author is doing the equivalent of saying “there are two doors left, so the odds are 50 / 50 that the prize is behind either door.

It invalidates all of the numbers after this point.

You’re able to fit more code on a screen, and it’s less visual noise. It’s like Pareto better. I really don’t get why others don’t copy it.

https://www.apple.com/macbook-air-13-and-15-m2/specs/