you are gonna be so stunned to find out when more than one thing can be true at the same time

are they doing science? yes. are they selling something? yes.

but the author explicitly distinguished between "AI" and "LLM-based AI", and they work for an AI company, where making these distinctions are really important

This is framed as an "or", as if they're contradictory.

IMO, Both of these statements are true.

i'll give you a hint: they're selling something

it was a joint venture with novell and caldera employees had exposure to the resources, a year or so after the project fell apart.

> just didn’t think there would be enough copies of it to not get lost very quickly

a lot more people had exposure to it than you'd think. it sounds very interesting to us, but honestly, it was probably pretty obvious to everyone involved that it was a bad idea unless apple was serious about dropping ppc

There are a few copies of late shell builds floating around in private collections that have release predicated on the end of someone's legal liability (shall we euphemistically say). I don't know about complete system images, though.

And those guys are all getting up there in years.

And yes, I'm aware of the fault of the incidents.

fault absolutely matters. and with two fatal accidents, it should be trivial to find out if waymo is at fault.

it is bad faith, otherwise.

https://www.science.org/content/article/made-order-bioweapon...

Being able to use AI to generate the steps to synthesize proteins means that you can use it to use it to generate the steps to synthesize known toxins. Suddenly, once difficult to attain knowledge is now available to everyone.

at least in the ai industry, chat is like kleenex

in the us, entirely legal. you may get law enforcement knocking on your door with questions, from time to time.

best to do it as part of a non profit or other organization, and being open about running a node, so that law enforcement/etc knows what they're dealing with

> decades, which is as long as they've been unable to crack double digit users

and you say

> I honestly don't really want you to use it.

then you kinda make their point entirely for them.

I'm not even going to bother addressing the rest of the projection in your post. Whew.

I'm not an AI maximalist, but I really can't see the issue with using it to preserve this hardware (especially into RTL for FPGA), if it's highly accurate.

These machines are dying in real time, and having cycle and operationally accurate emulation options is more important than the bad taste the Glorified Copymachine leaves in my mouth, to be honest.

Honestly, by quantity alone, I've seen more impressive and quality reverse-engineering and documentation work of these platforms done in the last year than i have in the last 20.

Normally yes. For VPK, actually, no.

The file format that we're describing was part of a proprietary embedded SDK for the PS2. The majority of professional integrations would be using the Sony SDK.

Today, a lot of tooling uses FFMPEG for accessibility of those formats. But I wouldn't say it's the majority.

Hence why I said "(studios)" after offices, and "probably" and not "majorly":

> probably being used in a lot of offices (studios)