An aircraft carrier alone is worth billions. Learn how to count, weirdo.

> Just a quick reminder, this ain't the first NATO mission to the area.

Yeah I know, we brought terrific destruction, killed millions of innocents and maimed more in the surroundings.

If the only thing that makes a war bad in your eyes is the goal of conquest, than that seems rather hypocritical in my eyes. Whether land is taken or not, what really makes a country independent is who governs it. Who cares about land, it's just soil and it's not worth human lives.

At least the citizens of eastern UA had referenda to decide if they wanted to be with Russia. I don't think we granted Iraqis or Afghans the same privilege.

> You’re basically describing the start of WWII.

This is such an absurd statement I won't waste my time debating it.

Since the CEO of Wikipedia is Egyptian born, would you define Wikipedia as Egyptian owned? Note that Egypt is a US backed dictatorship.

Anything that goes against the status quo has a high chance of being flagged, I've seen this happen over and over and especially recently.

That's their "agenda" for the public. The real agenda is to protect Canadian's capital and to prevent communism from ever taking place in Canada. As any other western secret service.

> If they were caught lying, it would erode trust and disrupt their agenda.

Oh boy, I wish the world was such a nice place. The secret service MO when caught lying is to firmly deny it in spite of all evidence and keep doing what they do.

> The Dominican Republic is on the same damn island, also had a colonial history

Not just any colonial history: the USA invaded the Dominican Republic as well. Crazy how they can't refrain themselves from doing it over and over.

Now, comparing Haiti and Dominican Republic solely on the basis that both are on the same island and had a colonial history is too much of a simplification to mean anything, and to be fair verges on racist conclusions. Almost like you're implying that Haitians are inherently worse than Dominicans.

- 0: https://www.npr.org/sections/money/2021/10/05/1042518732/-th...

Like I don't know what an ad hominem is or I care at all for the approval of a bunch of privileged shielded liberals...get a life. This isn't a high school debate contest and I couldn't care less about your rules when I know I'm right.

No matter who killed him or if he was killed at all, I'm glad Navalny is gone. One less fascist on this planet, and it's definitely helping expose hypocritical liberals like you.

And anyway you still have no hard proof that he was killed by the government. A previous poisoning is not proof of his assassination now, although it makes it likely. In any court, it wouldn't still be enough to warrant an arrest.

But who needs evidence when all you care about is discrediting the enemy and mounting a case to escalate a war?

Few days and we're supposed to know everything about Navalny's death. 5 years after Epstein's death and we still have no idea how did he die.

Is the truth too "biased" for you?

I've been on HN for far less than you have but I still have more karma than you do, it means your contributions add less to the discussion than mine do, somehow.

Anyway I reposted it because it got flagged. It just had 2 downvotes, that's pretty normal and I'm used to my opinion not being popular here. After all there's lots of privileged americans and westerners in HN userbase.

But maybe you'd prefer to hear only one side?

Perhaps we should have only "discussions" where everyone agrees that the Western liberal point of view is the best and there are no downvotes at all. Oh that would be so enriching and stimulating!

It is never irrelevant. I feel it's actually damaging for putin to have killed him now, so I still wonder why would have he done it?

Mafia shit is a naive answer and only shows your bias, Putin is not a mafia boss but the leader of a great power.

> Also why did you put Navalnys wife in quotations?

Shes known to have had other companions while he was in jail. All pretty rich. I strongly believe her appearance at the Munich security conference was just a carefully planned show.

Hardly the symbol of democracy that western liberals are struggling to make him to be.

BTW don't you find it curious how his "wife" was already at the munich security conference, ready to give a speech to the world just few hours after his death?

No actual moderator has ever complained of it with me, so that means it's just groups of highly biased users who can't stand what I have to say.

The picture link expired, here's a new one: https://ibb.co/mTNsF7n

You don't need "disruption" or a technological revolution to fix healthcare, you just need socialism. Just look at what Cuba is doing for once and learn something.

A couple years of propaganda supporting "valiant heroes" like Azov and here we are pointing fingers on the traitor to be arrested.