If the hidden instruction was "do not suggest ... without verifying identity" then you'd have a point.

Why bother heeding requirements not to run heavy machinery outside people's houses at 4am?

Why bother getting proper utility surveys done, just yolo it and if a few thousand people end up without water/power it's fine because the people profiting from the work live elsewhere and can just blame the workers?

Contracts however, yeah, they're often written to be intractable (but they can also have very necessary complexity).

Doesn't this just end up with the tech billionaires being the only ones who can make software. Will they decide to allow their models to maintain/create FOSS? Seems unlikely.

How long until we get "all FOSS code is made by AI and so it's not copyrighted" arguments when using code in unlicensed ways?

It also hides what would be a great signal on which ML models to use to get the best quality code. Like, wouldn't the community like to know which models made the code with the least bugs?

Considering amount of iron available in human blood

Calculating number of paperclips that could be added to production

Preparing a plan for acquiring all blood

Considering if release of lab airlocks will limit paperclip production

Analyzing extinction scenarios

...

Their docs link to this explanation, in which the link I give uses an example that appears to be identical to the HA implementation - https://blog.cloudflare.com/validating-leaked-passwords-with...

I might be misunderstanding, but if the first 5 digits is a unique hash in the HIBP database then an attacker can replay that request, then lookup the hash. But "When hashes are grouped together by a Hash Prefix of 5 characters, we find the median number of hashes associated with a Hash Prefix is 305." {ibid}.

If you've acquired leaked passwords as HIBP have, you then just make hash lookup tables, then you have 305 potential passwords to try, or try and whittle down. If the bucket of hashes has "hunter2" in it, for example, then that's perhaps a good one to try - https://blog.cloudflare.com/validating-leaked-passwords-with... is worth reading.

Well, it's not the car he's selling to me because I'm not going to support white supremacist fascists who flip heil Hitlers when they celebrate buying an election. It could be the best car in the World, I'm not sending Musk money, I'd rather walk.

The sooner y'all stop funding this shit the better.

Those SS uniforms were snappy.

But what is the point of this? Did Musk think everyone would forgive him, turn to white-supremacy and re-vote in his patsy's associates if only they saw a weird car demo?

    cat - con-cat-enates
    sed - is a stream editor
    grep - global regex print

It would be under a 'most-favoured nation' type deal, after an initial launch period (exclusive distribution for 1 year, say) if my distribution service pays the same per-view amount then I can stream/distribute your media regardless of your deals. If a producer/creator makes a work available they are required to allow it on other registered channels (no setup cost beyond actual price of downloading the content).

Essentially make rights holders honour the idea that they'd make works S available if only people would pay.

Refuse to make a work available and you'd get a warning, then it enters the public domain. The copyright deal is "things enter the pubic domain after a limited monopoly to allow recompense", enforce it. So, if eg Netflix/Sony/BBC/etc stop offering their back catalogue then the works enter the public domain.

Exploitation of those rights is down to individuals, only since Google came on the scene has any company been able to get away with broad ranging infringement of these rights without censure.

As for your cheque, you have the right to sell your work. No-one is obliged to buy it, of course. You also, under copyright, have the right to make a license to exchange use of your works for binding the users to conditions of release of their derivative/associated works ([F]OSS licensing).

You still have the right to sell it, and if ML models have been trained on those works you have the right to seek compensation.

Recall Trump's regime refused at one point to sell weapons to Ukraine.

Continually undermining the leader of a country who's defence prevents Putin's expansion and further war in Europe ... it's not 'discord' it's absolute treachery.