<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: pcrh</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=pcrh</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 14:22:11 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=pcrh" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pcrh in "Princeton mandates proctoring for in-person exams, upending 133 year precedent"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Mostly by requiring analysis and synthesis rather than memorization.<p>It's been some years for me so things might have changed, but no tech was allowed into the exam rooms, except for calculators in some subjects. Everything was done by pen and paper.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2026 05:17:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48131352</link><dc:creator>pcrh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48131352</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48131352</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[The Latest News in Vaccine Obstruction]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/latest-news-vaccine-obstruction">https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/latest-news-vaccine-obstruction</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128349">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128349</a></p>
<p>Points: 29</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 22:18:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.science.org/content/blog-post/latest-news-vaccine-obstruction</link><dc:creator>pcrh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128349</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128349</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pcrh in "Princeton mandates proctoring for in-person exams, upending 133 year precedent"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>With reference to the "cultural" allusions of many posts in this thread, I can assure you that in the WASP UK universities of Oxford and Cambridge, all exams are "proctored".<p>It is assumed that students will attempt to cheat, so exams are designed so that cheating is not a viable strategy to obtain high grades. So-called invigilators also patrol the exam room and will report any violations.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2026 22:16:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128334</link><dc:creator>pcrh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128334</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48128334</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pcrh in "Poland is now among the 20 largest economies. How it happened"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Incomes in the former GDR are comparable to those of Poland. They still lag behind West Germany, however (as does Poland).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 13:23:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48062762</link><dc:creator>pcrh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48062762</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48062762</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pcrh in "Egg Intake and the Incidence of Alzheimer's Disease in Adventist Health Study-2"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The questionnaire included 200 food items. Within the study, 9 food categories are listed. No adjustment for multiple hypothesis testing is reported in the methods section.<p>We have to take it on faith that they did in fact specifically set out to determine if egg consumption was associated with Alzheimer's disease...<p>A quick search shows that other studies both do [0] and do not [1] link egg consumption with Alzheimer's disease.<p>[0] <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38782209/" rel="nofollow">https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/38782209/</a>; <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31360988/" rel="nofollow">https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/31360988/</a><p>[1] <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28052883/" rel="nofollow">https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28052883/</a>; <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33561122/" rel="nofollow">https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33561122/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 10:27:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48047690</link><dc:creator>pcrh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48047690</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48047690</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pcrh in "Egg Intake and the Incidence of Alzheimer's Disease in Adventist Health Study-2"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The source of funding is not the only suspicious thing...<p>From the actual study, which is free to read [0]:<p>>Dietary intake was assessed at baseline using a validated, self-administered FFQ that included >200 food items<p>So out of 200 potential associations, eggs were the winner? See this famous xkcd: Green jelly beans linked to acne.[1]<p>[0] <a href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022316626001902" rel="nofollow">https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002231662...</a><p>[1] <a href="https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/882:_Significant" rel="nofollow">https://www.explainxkcd.com/wiki/index.php/882:_Significant</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2026 18:58:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48040173</link><dc:creator>pcrh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48040173</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48040173</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pcrh in "US–Indian space mission maps extreme subsidence in Mexico City"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The San Joaqin Valley picture is astounding!<p><a href="https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/land-subsidence-san-joaquin-valley" rel="nofollow">https://www.usgs.gov/media/images/land-subsidence-san-joaqui...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 19:30:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48027345</link><dc:creator>pcrh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48027345</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48027345</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pcrh in "The first photo published in a newspaper"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Those are impressive! It's worth noting that the photographic technology had advanced considerably between 1848 and 1906.<p>The exposure time of these kite photographs must have been quite short, given the obvious instability of the platform. They're very detailed, nonetheless.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2026 19:27:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48027308</link><dc:creator>pcrh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48027308</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48027308</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pcrh in "US–Indian space mission maps extreme subsidence in Mexico City"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The amount of subsidence is quite dramatic, up to 25 cm per year!<p>What are the practical consequences of this today, and what is being done to remedy this?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 03 May 2026 21:06:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48001497</link><dc:creator>pcrh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48001497</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48001497</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pcrh in "Why has there been so little progress on Alzheimer's disease?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Both meta-analyses above cover all eligible clinical trials for the respective strategies, targeting the GLP-1 receptor, or targeting amyloid.<p>For the GLP-1 strategy, Table 1 in the above paper shows that <i>all</i> drugs were clearly effective. Some were better than others.<p>For the amyloid strategy, only some of the drugs were effective, and that efficacy was very weak, <i>even when</i> all the drugs removed amyloid. This brings into question the hypothesis that removing amyloid would alleviate AD, i.e. the slender benefits of Lecanemab might not be caused by amyloid removal. The same cannot be said for the GLP-1 receptor agonists.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 18:47:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47938766</link><dc:creator>pcrh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47938766</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47938766</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pcrh in "Why has there been so little progress on Alzheimer's disease?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If you grouped all GLP-1 agonists that had entered clinical trials, they would be shown as successful [0]. No GLP-1 receptor agonist has failed to reduce appetite in clinical trials, but some were better than others.<p>The point about the anti-amyloid trials is that they all succeeded in removing amyloid. But they did not improve cognition, and only some resulted in a slightly slower rate of decline in cognition (people still declined).<p>[0] <a href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39841962/" rel="nofollow">https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/39841962/</a><p>>Forty-seven RCTs were included, with a combined cohort of 23,244 patients. GLP-1 RAs demonstrated a mean weight reduction of -4.57 kg (95% CI -5.35 to -3.78), mean BMI reduction of -2.07 kg/m2 (95% CI -2.53 to -1.62), and mean waist circumference reduction of -4.55 cm (95% CI -5.72 to -3.38) compared with placebo.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 09:09:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47932077</link><dc:creator>pcrh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47932077</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47932077</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pcrh in "Why has there been so little progress on Alzheimer's disease?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>All the trials included in the Cochrane review demonstrated removal of Aβ amyloid from the brain. Side effects were relatively modest, except for edema and micro-bleeds. So they are all legitimate tests of the hypothesis that removing Aβ amyloid would be beneficial.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:50:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47931573</link><dc:creator>pcrh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47931573</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47931573</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pcrh in "Why has there been so little progress on Alzheimer's disease?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The first GLP-1 receptor agonist to enter clinical trials was exenatide by Amylin Pharmaceuticals. It worked from the get go.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 07:43:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47931518</link><dc:creator>pcrh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47931518</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47931518</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pcrh in "Why has there been so little progress on Alzheimer's disease?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The Cochrane review did not ask the question of whether Lecanemab (for example) worked, it asked the more general question of whether targeting amyloid worked. If targeting amyloid, generally, worked you might expect all approaches to targeting amyloid to show <i>some</i> efficacy. So they included all those for which clinical trials had been conducted. Obviously some treatments didn't pass the threshold required and so were not subsequently approved. If you only included successful trials you would bias the outcome.<p>It's possible, of course, that some methods of targeting amyloid might work where others failed. But even those that claim success (Donanemab and Lecanemab) have a very modest benefit.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 09:03:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47919288</link><dc:creator>pcrh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47919288</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47919288</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pcrh in "Why has there been so little progress on Alzheimer's disease?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The question asked in the Cochrane review linked to above is whether there is evidence that current <i>treatments</i> targeting amyloid provide relief. Their conclusion is that the effect is too small to be considered beneficial. 
Especially when considering the undoubted side-effects, which include edema and micro-bleeding in the brain.<p>It doesn't ask whether amyloid is causative of the disease.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 07:11:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47918593</link><dc:creator>pcrh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47918593</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47918593</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pcrh in "Why has there been so little progress on Alzheimer's disease?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Agreed, using these anti-amyloid treatments at an early stage in people with a high risk of early onset Alzheimer's disease, such as those with Down's syndrome, is likely the most robust test available of the theory that Aβ amyloid is directly causative of this disease.<p>Trials are currently ongoing. The results should start trickling out in a few years...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 20:24:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47913940</link><dc:creator>pcrh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47913940</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47913940</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pcrh in "Why has there been so little progress on Alzheimer's disease?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The point of systematic reviews is to be un-biased. So if their question is whether targeting Aβ amyloid is a valid approach they have to include the unsuccessful trails as well as those purported to be successful.<p>As to the trials specifically for Lecanemab and Donanemab, the benefits are not claimed to be either strong or large, even by those who support it. The current support these receive is more aligned with the concept that an improved targeting of Aβ amyloid might improve outcomes. This remains to be demonstrated.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 19:59:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47913613</link><dc:creator>pcrh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47913613</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47913613</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pcrh in "Why has there been so little progress on Alzheimer's disease?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Unfortunately the evidence that targeting amyloid (e.g. Lecanemab and Donanemab) improves the symptoms of Alzheimer's disease is very weak. See the latest systematic review [0]. This does <i>not</i> mean however that amyloid plays no role in the disease, the treatment may simply be too late.<p>[0] <a href="https://www.cochrane.org/evidence/CD016297_are-medicines-anti-amyloid-monoclonal-antibodies-reduce-build-abnormal-proteins-brain-effective" rel="nofollow">https://www.cochrane.org/evidence/CD016297_are-medicines-ant...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 19:05:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47912932</link><dc:creator>pcrh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47912932</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47912932</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pcrh in "Why has there been so little progress on Alzheimer's disease?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Unable to read the full article, however the amyloid hypothesis is not without solid scientific foundations.<p>Alzheimer's disease may occur either due to inherited mutations in the genes for APP or presenilin, in which case it can occur as young as 40 yrs old. Or it may occur "sporadically" in those over 65yrs old. The brain pathology of both is similar. Notably, amyloid is derived from APP in part by the action of presenilin, which cuts the APP protein to release the amyloid peptide (Aβ).<p>Currently, the amyloid hypothesis is the only known way to reconcile the similarity of pathology (for both amyloid and tau) between early onset inherited AD caused by mutations in either APP or presenilin, and later onset sporadic disease. Furthermore, all the mutations in APP that cause Alzheimer's disease are located within or adjacent to the region that corresponds to Aβ amyloid, and not in the remaining 95% of the molecule.<p>Until another way of unifying these observations is found, the amyloid hypothesis will always find supporters.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Apr 2026 11:19:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47909385</link><dc:creator>pcrh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47909385</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47909385</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pcrh in "Oxford All Souls College General Examination (2025) [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>All Souls College doesn't have any students, graduate or otherwise. It's primarily a place where people can conduct research into any topic, most often in the humanities.<p>It frequently hosts journalists, politicians, lawyers, etc, who have had successful careers outside of academia and who may have no academic qualifications other than an undergraduate degree, and sometimes no degree at all.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2026 07:42:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47899532</link><dc:creator>pcrh</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47899532</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47899532</guid></item></channel></rss>