Hacker News: pczy

New comment by pczy in "AWS Bedrock to require sharing data with Anthropic for Mythos and future models"

pczy — Wed, 10 Jun 2026 12:54:54 +0000

This policy applies across all providers. Here is the warning in Cursor: https://i.redd.it/7sfyker2ya6h1.png

Note that Anthropic has committed not to train models on logged data, so I don’t understand some of the concerns here. What exactly is your threat model? That Anthropic would train models contrary to their terms of service? That you trust them enough not to log your data prior to this, but not enough to trust their stated limits on how logged data will be used now?

Edit: I am partially convinced by some of the replies. However, it is worth noting that this change primarily affects Enterprise users. Data from consumer plans is already retained for 30 days. Source: https://privacy.claude.com/en/articles/10023548-how-long-do-...

New comment by pczy in "OpenCode – Open source AI coding agent"

pczy — Fri, 20 Mar 2026 21:46:29 +0000

They are not blacklisted. You are allowed to use the API at commercial usage pricing. You are just not allowed to use your Claude Code subscription with OpenCode (or any other third‑party harness for the record).

New comment by pczy in "Craig Wright suing developers to forcibly give him access to internet coins"

pczy — Wed, 19 Jan 2022 14:34:47 +0000

Even being non-American with my necessarily flawed understanding of the US constitution, the scenario you described strikes me as a clear violation of the first amendment. First, you would have to compel someone to write new code that changes the way bitcoin fundamentally works. Assuming you manage to do so, you would then have to compel "everyone" to recognise the hard-fork as the "true" chain, again something clearly at odds with the first amendment, and I suspect the laws in many other jurisdictions as well (for obvious reasons).

New comment by pczy in "The Fed Will Buy Bond ETFs Now"

pczy — Wed, 13 May 2020 04:51:23 +0000

As far as I'm aware, the arbitrage mechanism works both ways. Continuing your analogy, authorized participants are able to trade the underlying turkeys for new tokens, or redeem the tokens for turkeys. When the price of a token is bidded up, its price becomes attractive relative to the turkeys. Authorized participants buy the underlying turkeys, create new tokens and then sell those tokens to take a risk free profit. This continues as long as there is a price mismatch, and ensures that ETF prices are in sync with the underlying assets.

New comment by pczy in "Removing the Linux /dev/random blocking pool"

pczy — Tue, 07 Jan 2020 14:44:31 +0000

This is the best explanation of this issue that i know of: https://www.2uo.de/myths-about-urandom