I’m no longer eligible to have an opinion UK or local conversations. “how would you know”, “the city’s changed a lot since you left”, “why are people who chose to leave so interested in X”, statements specific to ex-pats.

For those from outside the UK, ex-pat (expatriate) as a singular term is almost always derogatory regardless of context or publisher.

It’s also probably the only one that would still look new, or current, if it was released today

I'm recalling the time I was trying to load a "backed up" game on my original Playstation using the disc swap [0] method while the chassis was open.

Since I had the top lid off, I had to hold the disc tray closed button for it to spin up. While looking away to pick up the other disc my pinky moved and touched a capacitor and had me on the receiving end of a massive zap.

I've never touched a capacitor since, thank goodness.

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yDopEevII3o

As the other commenter mentioned, testssl.sh lets you can websites that aren’t public yet e.g. test environments or other private networks. As well as testing against starttls if you need to test encryption on a mail gateway.

It’s also configurable, meaning you can have it test tls protocols alone, or ciphers alone, client renegotiation alone making it quicker and easier to read if you are looking at specific areas

I’ve just tried running it a moment ago to compare. The output isn’t as organised/readable and it includes several tracebacks for failed checks (tlsv1.1, tlsv1.2, tlsv1.3, and compliance against Mozilla TLS configuration).

Always open to different tools but it seems testssl.sh is currently more complete

Why do you hate the whole community?

Boom is probably the closest thing to what is suggested but many still doubt they will make it to production. That’s minimal investment though and mostly around options on orders, so they still need massive funding to get there. Rolls Royce and others have said it’s not viable to design an engine for them so now they have to design the airframe and the engine.

Bombardier is an example of why new entrants should be concerned. As soon as you become a close threat, you don’t really trigger competition you trigger massive protectionism which forces them to sell the design to airbus, further consolidating the market

I think the incumbents would have to be broken up to seed any new competition that is remotely viable. The Boeing story has some way to go yet though, who knows

https://www.cxtoday.com/data-analytics/the-purge-continues-t...

I haven't read Herman Pontzer's recent research, I'd equate to becoming a more efficient runner; as efficiency increases energy demands are reduced.

Some of today's research just didn't exist when this was written. Of course, some of the advice was already debatable by the time I got to read it in the mid-late 00's, but that can be said for a lot of health and fitness advice even today.

I didn't follow it proscriptively. What it did do was give me a different approach to tackling it as a problem and was the first resource I had read that helped in that regard. Everything else was very much eat less of this and more of that

Like thread's asking which book/resource to use when learning to code, there are many good examples out there. Not all are perfect, and some are occasionally wrong but like that example, this was the one that stuck with me.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Hacker%27s_Diet

Couldn’t find a ceiling fan remote one time ( I have 3 with the exact same remote ) and used it to manage fan speeds

Still doesn’t justify the cost but I guess it’s like my leatherman. Hardly use it but handy when I do.

I actually bought it when seeing the pwnagotchi comparison and expected functionality from the wifi/marauder dev boards to be included. Meaning I got my flipper in the first batch for my country but couldn’t get a dev board even months later

It did mention the financial and public sector industries, which you call out, and only being able to speak for the UK however.

While it didn’t include HFT, that doesn’t employee the same number of heads as the others

In B, the publisher is stating as factual that the passenger was indeed kicked off (as opposed to getting off for any other reason) and that it was in fact for reason Y.

B puts the weight of the writer/publisher behind the claim with a higher bar for verification of events

Also, I think the passenger is trying to be helpful but surely he knows that he can’t manage the infotainment system as a passenger. There has to be some detail or interaction not reported here