<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: pelzatessa</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=pelzatessa</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2026 04:39:43 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=pelzatessa" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pelzatessa in "A native graphical shell for SSH"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>but its just standard <video> element, in firefox I can even right-click to change the speed to 2x. It's certainly better privacy-wise.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 17:20:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48722114</link><dc:creator>pelzatessa</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48722114</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48722114</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pelzatessa in "Privatemode.ai – AI provider with confidential computing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I found them randomly in the opencode providers list. Can't find any info on them, but they claim to have solved confidential computing:<p><a href="https://docs.privatemode.ai/security/#verifiability" rel="nofollow">https://docs.privatemode.ai/security/#verifiability</a><p>They've been around since the beginning of 2025 as far as I can say, but it's hard to find any information about them. Did anyone actually use them? Are they truly verifiable EE2E AI provider? Can't find any writeups on this service and they seem to be quite what I was waiting for since the beginning of the AI boom.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 10:13:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48106240</link><dc:creator>pelzatessa</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48106240</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48106240</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Privatemode.ai – AI provider with confidential computing]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.privatemode.ai/">https://www.privatemode.ai/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48106215">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48106215</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 10:09:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.privatemode.ai/</link><dc:creator>pelzatessa</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48106215</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48106215</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pelzatessa in "Migrating to the EU"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not sure which thread you're referring to, but yeah, it is a legit question. I genuinely wondered what made the OP state that it's proven that mullvad doesn't collect logs. While I don't think it's possible at all to prove that some software is running on a remote server, or that this software doesn't collect logs, some people try to find a way to do that, for example Signal claimed that one can verify code running on their servers by code attestation feature embedded in their Intel SGX enclaves, see <a href="https://signal.org/blog/private-contact-discovery/" rel="nofollow">https://signal.org/blog/private-contact-discovery/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 21:12:13 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47495176</link><dc:creator>pelzatessa</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47495176</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47495176</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pelzatessa in "Migrating to the EU"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>While their account privacy policy is commendable, it isn't a proof for not collecting logs.<p>Even without personal details you can collect quite a lot of data - ip address that uses certain VPN account, which servers it talks to while using vpn, at what hours, at what intervals, also all the plaintext data exchanged between client and server. A lot of data that someone (who might already have your ip address mapped to your personal info, for example your ISP, or an online store where you shopped something before you turned on the VPN) would be willing to pay good money for. And companies like money.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 14:22:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47489970</link><dc:creator>pelzatessa</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47489970</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47489970</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pelzatessa in "Migrating to the EU"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> I’ve always been a happy Mullvad customer. For 5 euros a month, I pay a Swedish company that has proven it doesn’t log any data<p>How did they prove that? Is such proof even possible?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 13:57:15 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47489627</link><dc:creator>pelzatessa</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47489627</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47489627</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pelzatessa in "I think WebRTC is better than SSH-ing for connecting to Mac terminal from iPhone"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In no serious case have I ever considered connecting to my PC terminal using phone. Connecting from PC to phone makes sense, but when talking the opposite situation,  phones simply are terrible at doing things from terminal. Keyboard takes roughly 40% of the screen, and displaying wide lines is awkward. Forget about TUI applications, Midnight Commander and such. Other than toying around and extreme emergencies, why?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2026 19:32:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47141602</link><dc:creator>pelzatessa</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47141602</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47141602</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pelzatessa in "GrapheneOS – Break Free from Google and Apple"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think that the main problem is that android has a lot of weird modifications that are not consistent with the rest of linux distros. The user data is suddenly in /data instead of /home, theres no package manager, no systemd (for better or worse), and there's hella lotta security gotchas, for example call recording is impossible without root as far as I know. I'm not saying that Android is not hackable, but it's a different type of hackability than desktop linux, you have to learn it all over again and in my opinion it's much harder to master than desktop linux.<p>I've been on ubports for 3 years and while it also has some weird caveats like read only rootfs, no working package manager (due to read-only fs. however ubports has pretty cool support for lxc containers where you can use apt). Due to chronic lack of time I haven't been able to sit down on my phone to play with it a bit (for example id like to install waydroid), but it seems a lot easier than android. For example, while there isn't an app for call recording, some guy worked around it by writing a systemd user service as a workaround[1]. This is exactly the type of thing I'm thinking about when talking "linux phone".<p>For me as a linux user, the difference if ubports was a human, I'd think that perhaps they were sick, whereas if android was a human, i'd shoot them in the face :)<p>[1] <a href="https://forums.ubports.com/post/75157" rel="nofollow">https://forums.ubports.com/post/75157</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 17 Feb 2026 12:33:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47046791</link><dc:creator>pelzatessa</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47046791</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47046791</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pelzatessa in "Bazzite Post-Mortem"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Some time ago I actually downloaded bazzite to run in a VM in order to play some indie games from itch.io and to not worry about them doing some shady things on my computer. I installed the OS and everything was fine, but to my surprise..... wine was not installed by default (I'm not familiar with wine environment, i just got that impression because the terminal didn't recognize the wine command when i typed it manually).<p>I get that the distribution is geared towards steam+proton usage, but I was disoriented to see that one creates "an operating system for gamers", which will most certainly run a lot of windows executables, and then won't include wine in it. There is lutris preinstalled and the documentation also hints towards installing winezgui from their appstore (which is what I did), but I wonder why wasn't that obvious for the developers of bazzite that after installing the system, user would just want to download a game, double click the executable and play.<p>On the other hand, wine tends to be quite heavy package (503MB installed size according to arch repo), perhaps that's the reason for not including it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 23:05:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46968297</link><dc:creator>pelzatessa</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46968297</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46968297</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pelzatessa in "The US is flirting with its first-ever population decline"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's only a short term solution, as all countries around the world (even those third-world ones, with current fertility rate above 4.0) are experiencing lower birthrates every year. See the movie birthgap</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 18:47:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46964852</link><dc:creator>pelzatessa</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46964852</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46964852</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pelzatessa in "Matrix messaging gaining ground in government IT"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>the problem with decentralized alternatives is that they are even less stable than matrix currently is, and therefore less adoptable by non-tech people. I'd love to spend more of my time on tox/jami/cabal rather than matrix, but I'll do so only after matrix is widespread enough, beacuse I think that currently matrix needs the contribution in form of actually using it and getting people to use it, so that it gets a stable userbase. once I won't worry about matrix getting weaker because of no users, then I'll look into decentralized messengers.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2026 14:33:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46960167</link><dc:creator>pelzatessa</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46960167</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46960167</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pelzatessa in "Why We Abandoned Matrix (2024)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I like matrix, but I'm glad they decided to go with SimpleX as an alternative instead of slack, discord etc. XMPP would be fine too i guess, but I think that projects like SimpleX and Matrix need more people to mature, while XMPP seems to have a lot of users but no ability to grow anymore. I also had to choose between simplex and matrix for my personal communications foundation, and I chose matrix as I gambled on its longer existence as indicator for maturity and therefore adaptability for my non-tech friends, time will tell if the bet was right.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2025 17:14:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46403280</link><dc:creator>pelzatessa</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46403280</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46403280</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pelzatessa in "Self-hosting a Matrix server for 5 years"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Been selfhosting synapse for about 1.5 years in a docker compose setup using bunkerweb (formerly "bunkerized nginx", which better explains it premise) reverse proxy, eturnal for TURN and postgres, also recently added livekit and MAS for element call and element X compatibility. All that runs on a small 2vcore/4gb VPS, and it runs pretty good, I experience a server crash every half a month, but that may be caused by the fact that bunkerweb isn't the most lightweight solution (they actually require 8GB RAM minimum, so I'm already beneath the limit), and also because I run some other software (mailserver, ebook server, plex, etc..).<p>My experience as a administrator has been pretty good, perhaps it's because from the beginning I was optimistic, it suited my needs as I wanted a selfhosted, modern and fairly convenient communication platform. From what I recall, most problems during configuration were caused mostly by bunkerweb (or rather my inability to correctly set it up to proxy requests correctly and not hijack the 4xx and 5xx HTTP codes). Synapse itself has been a pleasure to maintain, but also bear in mind that I did not tinker with with it, I basically set it up and let it run for about a year and then added MAS and livekit.<p>Yeah, disk usage sucks, for about 5-10 active users and 1.5 year usage my postgres "schemas" folder clocks at 10Gibs. It doesn't include the media_store catalog where synapse keeps media (images, videos). The homeserver is federated and I joined a couple of big rooms in the past. Mechanics mentioned in the links below do help though:<p><a href="https://matrix-org.github.io/synapse/v1.40/admin_api/purge_history_api.html" rel="nofollow">https://matrix-org.github.io/synapse/v1.40/admin_api/purge_h...</a><p><a href="https://github.com/matrix-org/rust-synapse-compress-state" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/matrix-org/rust-synapse-compress-state</a><p>Clientwise also sucks, but I think enough has already been said on this matter. But it's good enough to keep my nontechnical friends using it. They do hate it, but not enough to kick me in the arse. Would love to say that this proves that element clientside is usable, but I also have to admit that my friends are just hella good guys who would even write pigeon mail to me if I stopped using anything else for communication :) for me as a techie, element is obviously alright. Clunky, but works. I think clients simply need more time.<p>What irritates me is the Matrix authentication service (MAS), it's kind of a separate service for matrix homeservers that handles logins specifficaly. You can't use element X without it. However when it's enabled, you cannot log in from your client, instead a web browser opens and shows the login panel where you have to authorize, and then it should return to the client. Except in my case it simply doesn't :( I observed that for some reason chromium based browsers won't redirect back to the element app, and it doesn't know that the authorization has been granted. I managed to bypass it by copying the URL and opening it on firefox, but in one instance even that didn't work.<p>But other than that MAS problems everything has been fine from administration standpoint. I think it simply needs more time, as it already has traction, I see that a lot of new projects seem to include a matrix room in their social/communication channels, frequently it's the only option besides the bugtracker. And I'm willing to wait patiently :)<p>edit: added links for people who also struggle with disk space usage</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2025 18:03:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46110665</link><dc:creator>pelzatessa</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46110665</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46110665</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pelzatessa in "Vitamin D reduces incidence and duration of colds in those with low levels"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Most interesting, will bear that in mind. To this date I haven't encountered any "drastically wrong" symptoms with my d3 usage and frankly haven't heard that much about any adverse events linked to vitamin d3. If you feel comfortable with that then you could disclose what exactly is that adverse effect you've been experiencing, but I see that you try to avoid this topic so no pressure :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 16:58:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45735455</link><dc:creator>pelzatessa</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45735455</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45735455</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pelzatessa in "Vitamin D reduces incidence and duration of colds in those with low levels"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I take 8000 D3 (+200ug K2 MK7) daily and I'm fine. since covid I go like this for entirety of winter and then back down when summer comes. Perhaps you live in a climate where you get a lot of sun exposure and somehow overdosed on that. A guy from vitadmindwiki.com even says that you'd have to take 14000IU daily for a year until reaching toxicity limit (although this guy tends to sometimes say different things on the same topic, so I'd be cautious on whether this is the exact amount)
<a href="https://vitamindwiki.com/Overview+Toxicity+of+vitamin+D" rel="nofollow">https://vitamindwiki.com/Overview+Toxicity+of+vitamin+D</a><p>Although it'd be great if you explained what exactly happened, perhaps it wasn't a result of taking vitamin D itself but rather some external thing. Judging by "painful experience" I assume kidney stones, which could be caused by too much calcium or genetic preference. not a doctor or an expert on the topic though, just open for a discussion :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2025 16:25:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45734956</link><dc:creator>pelzatessa</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45734956</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45734956</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pelzatessa in "Hacker News – The Good Parts"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What I wish for would be some kind of frontend for viewing hacker news (specifically the comment section) in a way that imageboards behave. I've never adapted to the reddit-style comment system for two reasons:<p>1. nested/indented comments are confusing. Perhaps it's connected to how I don't like programming languages that rely on indents for defining blocks of script instead of curly brackets, but I think that the reasons are unrelated. When you have a large tree of comments, it's simply hard to keep track which comment replies to which. It's easy when you have a couple comments, but I simply can't process a large tree of, say, 20 comments, I'll forget the context of the parent by the time I read the 5th one. Also sometimes it's hard to recognize if the next comment is indented 1 or 2 times to the left.  I don't know why is this design so popular, someone even wrote a frontpage for 4chan that displayed its posts in this manner. I'd love to have a frontpage for hackernews that displayed its posts like on an imageboard! if you know such, please let me know. At least HN provides the next/prev/parent buttons, but they lack the onhover rendering of the post like on 4chan. These buttons also don't exist on hckrnws.com frontend which I tend to use, but it's a minor nitpick.<p>2. upvotes. I really like the 4chan way of bumping and making comments with a lot of replies the ones that stand out instead of those that a lot of people agree with. I think it encourages more diverse opinions. But on the other hand, perhaps the upvote system is somehow key to the pretty high level of discussion on HN, can't really tell.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Oct 2025 22:35:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45611505</link><dc:creator>pelzatessa</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45611505</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45611505</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pelzatessa in "Signal Protocol and Post-Quantum Ratchets"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In the scenario with mailservers with PGP encrypted messages I did intend the messages to be encrypted client side, perhaps it was not clear enough. When I selfhost my own server (and my trusted friend selfhosts his), I can be completely sure that the encrypted messages will not be dumped either through storage or while relaying them. If sent PGP end-to-end encrypted messages through, say, gmail, then I'm not 100% sure that gmail won't store these messages somewhere and decrypt them whenever quantum computing becomes available for them.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 12:42:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45462302</link><dc:creator>pelzatessa</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45462302</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45462302</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pelzatessa in "Signal Protocol and Post-Quantum Ratchets"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Huh, it's true. I thought an organization that needs $50M yearly to function[1] would employ more people. Still, I think it's fair to call them "pretty big" looking on how much media exposure they get or their operating costs. Perhaps a bit misleading from my part with the "company" part, as I'm not english-native, every type of firm,company,foundation in my head translates to a "company", sorry about that, will be more clear next time :)<p>[1] <a href="https://www.wired.com/story/signal-operating-costs/" rel="nofollow">https://www.wired.com/story/signal-operating-costs/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 12:24:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45462142</link><dc:creator>pelzatessa</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45462142</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45462142</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pelzatessa in "Signal Protocol and Post-Quantum Ratchets"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah, that's true. If they did though, then I think that they'd be more secure than with Signal, at least in this certain aspect of message storage.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 12:16:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45462068</link><dc:creator>pelzatessa</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45462068</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45462068</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pelzatessa in "Signal Protocol and Post-Quantum Ratchets"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>My point is that to this date everyone was not post-quantum secure, and only the people whom had their messages stored on their servers only can be sure that someone won't read their contents.<p>Also PGP emails were just an idea that seemed the most basic for me to illustrate an example of selfhosted encrypted messaging. Probably they lack more security features than just post-quantum, compared to the other messengers anyway :)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Oct 2025 12:14:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45462053</link><dc:creator>pelzatessa</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45462053</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45462053</guid></item></channel></rss>