<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: perennate</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=perennate</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Apr 2026 13:26:25 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=perennate" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[OlmoEarth: A new Earth observation foundation model family]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://allenai.org/blog/olmoearth-models">https://allenai.org/blog/olmoearth-models</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45811882">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45811882</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Nov 2025 15:11:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://allenai.org/blog/olmoearth-models</link><dc:creator>perennate</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45811882</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45811882</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by perennate in "Lessons from Washington State’s New Capital Gains Tax"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> capital gains tax rate is 50%<p>That makes it sound like you pay half of capital gains in taxes, but I think what you mean is that 50% of capital gains is taxable, and that this portion is taxed at the same rate as other personal income. Personally I think 100% of capital gains should be taxable at the marginal income tax rate.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 02 Jun 2023 19:11:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36169456</link><dc:creator>perennate</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36169456</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=36169456</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[VisProg: Visual Reasoning through High-Level Program Execution]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://prior.allenai.org/projects/visprog">https://prior.allenai.org/projects/visprog</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35247614">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35247614</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Mar 2023 15:28:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://prior.allenai.org/projects/visprog</link><dc:creator>perennate</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35247614</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35247614</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by perennate in "Norton is installing a Cryptocurrency miner called Norton Crypto (NCrypt.exe)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> I wouldn't trust a support page's definition of "opt-in"<p>The support page doesn't have any definition of "opt-in". It simply says that users need to click under "Turn your PC's idle time to cash" and then accept a "License and Services Agreement" before they can access the "Norton Crypto dashboard" and enable "mining during idle time". I would consider that opt-in given that the user has to perform multiple steps before they can even enable the miner, and given that there isn't any suggestion to enable this by default during the installation process. If you don't consider that "opt-in", then please explain.<p>There seems to be a mob here that has been misled to think that the cryptocurrency miner is enabled by default and runs on every Norton user's computer in the background, whereas in reality it IS installed by default (as in the binary takes up storage space on the user's hard drive), but can only be enabled with multiple steps including agreeing to a separate services agreement that is dedicated to the Norton Crypto product.<p>(I still think it's dumb to bundle a crypto miner with an anti-virus product. But all this talk about it running without the user's consent is nonsense.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Jan 2022 00:48:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29803304</link><dc:creator>perennate</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29803304</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29803304</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by perennate in "Norton is installing a Cryptocurrency miner called Norton Crypto (NCrypt.exe)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>See also <a href="https://support.norton.com/sp/en/us/home/current/solutions/v138388461" rel="nofollow">https://support.norton.com/sp/en/us/home/current/solutions/v...</a> seems clearly opt-in.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 22:26:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29801564</link><dc:creator>perennate</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29801564</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29801564</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by perennate in "Norton is installing a Cryptocurrency miner called Norton Crypto (NCrypt.exe)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> You can however "pause" the mining forever while keeping everything installed which is what support will suggest if you ask.<p>Just to clarify because this sentence sounds a bit misleading -- according to <a href="https://support.norton.com/sp/en/us/home/current/solutions/v138388461" rel="nofollow">https://support.norton.com/sp/en/us/home/current/solutions/v...</a> the cryptocurrency miner is off by default, so if you haven't turned it on, then there's no need to pause it if you don't want it running.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 22:21:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29801476</link><dc:creator>perennate</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29801476</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29801476</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by perennate in "Norton is installing a Cryptocurrency miner called Norton Crypto (NCrypt.exe)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It is installed but not activated without warning AFAIK. According to <a href="https://support.norton.com/sp/en/us/home/current/solutions/v138388461" rel="nofollow">https://support.norton.com/sp/en/us/home/current/solutions/v...</a> the user must first agree to a Norton Crypto License and Services Agreement and then explicitly activate the miner before anything will happen.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 22:19:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29801431</link><dc:creator>perennate</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29801431</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29801431</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by perennate in "Norton is installing a Cryptocurrency miner called Norton Crypto (NCrypt.exe)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> oblivious customers<p>Users must explicitly agree to a Norton Crypto License and Services Agreement and activate mining before the software starts mining Ethereum. It is unlikely there would be any oblivious customers.<p>See <a href="https://support.norton.com/sp/en/us/home/current/solutions/v138388461" rel="nofollow">https://support.norton.com/sp/en/us/home/current/solutions/v...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 22:18:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29801413</link><dc:creator>perennate</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29801413</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29801413</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by perennate in "Norton is installing a Cryptocurrency miner called Norton Crypto (NCrypt.exe)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> (1) does not inform the user or ask for consent<p>> (2) seemingly does not offer an option to disable it<p>Where do you see this? As far as I can tell, it is off by default, and the user must explicitly enable it (consent) to use the miner.<p>See e.g. <a href="https://support.norton.com/sp/en/us/home/current/solutions/v138388461" rel="nofollow">https://support.norton.com/sp/en/us/home/current/solutions/v...</a> which mentions a License and Services Agreement that must be accepted before the miner can be used at all, and clearly says the mining status can be toggled between Active and Paused.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 04 Jan 2022 22:15:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29801372</link><dc:creator>perennate</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29801372</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29801372</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by perennate in "Man fined for sharing a Facebook link ruled as defamation in Singapore"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I agree that there needs to be a balance. I'd argue that US defamation law is close to the "right" balance, by making a stronger case needed to prosecute defamation against public figures (like public officials or celebrities), and by focusing not exactly on intention but on whether the defendant within reason could have believed the statement was true.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2021 18:07:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26810794</link><dc:creator>perennate</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26810794</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26810794</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by perennate in "Man fined for sharing a Facebook link ruled as defamation in Singapore"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> then the question is whether you actively participated in<p>There is another important question: intention. In the US, "for a public official (or other legitimate public figure) to win a libel case in the United States, the statement must have been published knowing it to be false or with reckless disregard to its truth" [1].<p>It seems to me that most of the problems come not from having the defamation law to begin with like you said, but from the law applying even to defendants who believed the information they were creating or disseminating was true.<p>[1] <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Defamation</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2021 17:54:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26810632</link><dc:creator>perennate</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26810632</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26810632</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by perennate in "Perfect Motherfucking Website"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I agree that they might be missing the point, but I also feel that adding a one or two extra CSS lines is really needed to turn something that is very unpleasant to read (the biggest problem being the unlimited width) into something that is really basically perfect. Like, this one is actually pretty much perfect, while the original makes me want to manually add a max-width from the inspector.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2021 17:16:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26741340</link><dc:creator>perennate</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26741340</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26741340</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by perennate in "Show HN: Cloud GPUs for Deep Learning – At 1/3 the Cost of AWS/GCP"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Unless you're using unsupervised learning or can find a good dataset, most of the cost will be in labeling the data. I'm not too familiar with background removal, there may be some self-supervised/contrastive learning approaches, but generally they don't work as well as supervised learning. Even for a week of training, the compute cost is only $200.<p>Edit: maybe you can get some decent results just with COCO segmentation labels: <a href="https://towardsdatascience.com/background-removal-with-deep-learning-c4f2104b3157" rel="nofollow">https://towardsdatascience.com/background-removal-with-deep-...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:51:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26495335</link><dc:creator>perennate</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26495335</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26495335</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by perennate in "Show HN: Cloud GPUs for Deep Learning – At 1/3 the Cost of AWS/GCP"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In the FAQ it says:<p>> Is my instance guaranteed?<p>> Yes, unless you run out of credit. To prevent that from happening be sure to setup automatic top ups.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:47:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26495284</link><dc:creator>perennate</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26495284</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26495284</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by perennate in "Show HN: Cloud GPUs for Deep Learning – At 1/3 the Cost of AWS/GCP"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I think Linode/Paperspace/AWS/GCP/etc. are closer to "direct competitors". I would be much more comfortable trusting a single entity that owns its servers than a GPU rental marketplace like vast.ai.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:46:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26495270</link><dc:creator>perennate</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26495270</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26495270</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by perennate in "Show HN: Cloud GPUs for Deep Learning – At 1/3 the Cost of AWS/GCP"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The website design put me off but the FAQ makes it clear that it is quite professional. They have information about physical security, GDPR compliance, and VLAN. Wish there was some information about storage, e.g. if it's local disk or distributed block storage, and how many replicas. Very nice that unused credit is refundable.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2021 18:42:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26495231</link><dc:creator>perennate</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26495231</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26495231</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by perennate in "‘Roaring Kitty’ Sued for Securities Fraud over GameStop Rise"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I mean, frivolous lawsuits are nothing new: <a href="https://www.thebalancesmb.com/most-ridiculous-lawsuits-of-all-time-4110919" rel="nofollow">https://www.thebalancesmb.com/most-ridiculous-lawsuits-of-al...</a><p>They usually get tossed out pretty quickly.<p>"In 2016, an Illinois man sued Starbucks for misrepresenting the amount of liquid contained in its cold drinks. ... The judge agreed with Starbucks' argument that a reasonable consumer who orders an iced drink expects the drink to contain both liquid and ice."</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 20:10:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26171033</link><dc:creator>perennate</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26171033</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26171033</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by perennate in "‘Roaring Kitty’ Sued for Securities Fraud over GameStop Rise"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I would imagine he would appear under his real name. It would be weird to hear his username in Congress, especially when there are no longer concerns about anonymity now that his name is publicized.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 20:04:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26170954</link><dc:creator>perennate</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26170954</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26170954</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by perennate in "‘Roaring Kitty’ Sued for Securities Fraud over GameStop Rise"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>His comments about the company's value were about the fundamentals and, to a very limited extent, about a possible short squeeze: <a href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alntJzg0Um4" rel="nofollow">https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=alntJzg0Um4</a><p>And at most it seems he was giving his opinion about the company. He never said something like "everyone should buy GameStop because it's guaranteed to rise in value".</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 19:59:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26170876</link><dc:creator>perennate</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26170876</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26170876</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by perennate in "Nigeria's Central Bank has prohibited banks from processing cryptocurrencies"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have mainly used Namecheap and NewEgg, not AT&T. Many of these companies may not process Bitcoin transactions themselves, but instead rely on a third party like Coinbase/Bitpay who handle the BTC-to-fiat conversion, so in that case the companies would not themselves host a wallet. My "directly" I mean that you don't need to convert your BTC to fiat to pay for these services. I suspect that most of the companies would stop accepting Bitcoin if it couldn't be converted to dollars, but that's not what I was replying to; I specifically said that "prices are pegged to fiat".</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2021 04:07:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26162562</link><dc:creator>perennate</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26162562</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=26162562</guid></item></channel></rss>