<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: phronimos</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=phronimos</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 01:25:29 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=phronimos" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by phronimos in "Jimi Hendrix was a systems engineer"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There are two definitions of the word according to Merriam-Webster. The second one is used accurately here.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 18:55:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47170411</link><dc:creator>phronimos</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47170411</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47170411</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by phronimos in "Jimi Hendrix was a systems engineer"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Interesting factoid: modern guitar effects typically have their input jacks on the right-hand side, and output jacks on the left. In this article's guitar rig diagram, the jacks are reversed, but this is accurate: back then, for whatever reason the jacks were reversed on each of these pedals. Modern reissues of the round-enclosure Fuzz Face pedals preserve this pattern despite the reversal of industry trends.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2026 01:18:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47160559</link><dc:creator>phronimos</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47160559</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47160559</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by phronimos in "Nvidia won, we all lost"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Are you referring to AI training, prediction/inference, or both? Could you give some examples for what had to be done and why? Thanks in advance.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2025 15:13:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44473307</link><dc:creator>phronimos</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44473307</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44473307</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by phronimos in "Show HN: Wetlands – a lightweight Python library for managing Conda environments"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Conda manages binaries and their native dependencies together, including shared libraries[0]. This offers significant advantages over uv and pip when distributing packages with C extensions, such as dependency resolution that accounts for shared library requirements, and better package isolation.<p>[0]: <a href="https://docs.conda.io/projects/conda-build/en/latest/resources/use-shared-libraries.html" rel="nofollow">https://docs.conda.io/projects/conda-build/en/latest/resourc...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2025 16:21:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44117709</link><dc:creator>phronimos</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44117709</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44117709</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by phronimos in "I don't like NumPy"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Numba is a great option for speeding up (vectorizing) loops and NumPy code, apart from CuPy and JAX. Xarray is also worth trying for tensors beyond 2 dimensions.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2025 18:55:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43998135</link><dc:creator>phronimos</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43998135</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43998135</guid></item></channel></rss>