<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: piltboy</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=piltboy</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 00:13:21 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=piltboy" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by piltboy in "Libre Barcode Project"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"Marelle is a free cursive font designed for teaching handwriting in [French] elementary school."<p>I'm not sure they owe it to anyone to make the website available in English :-)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2026 08:36:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48684015</link><dc:creator>piltboy</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48684015</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48684015</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by piltboy in "Mr TIFF"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Generally speaking I would classify TIFF and its variants as imaging formats (or for very simple numerical datasets), and NetCDF as more suited for raw data, in particular multi-dimensional data with time series, etc.<p>For forecast and climatological data I find NetCDF is vastly superior, but also much more complicated to work with due to the capabilities and how open the format is. Just have a look at the complexity of the CF Conventions to see what I mean: <a href="https://cfconventions.org/cf-conventions/release/v1.12.0/cf-conventions.html" rel="nofollow">https://cfconventions.org/cf-conventions/release/v1.12.0/cf-...</a><p>For visualizing orthophotos and the like, I would choose GeoTIFF any day of the week, as they're easy to visualize across platforms using existing libraries. Using COGs you also get the functionality of a spatial index within each GeoTIFF file, meaning that you can stream subsets of GeoTIFF files without having to scan through the entire file for each request.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 12:46:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45822264</link><dc:creator>piltboy</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45822264</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45822264</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by piltboy in "Mr TIFF"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>TIFF is still very much alive in certain circles, see for example <a href="https://cogeo.org/" rel="nofollow">https://cogeo.org/</a>
The format is basically a TIFF file with attached georeferencing information and with the data organized by geographical sector, enabling fast downloads of regional subsets.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 05 Nov 2025 09:24:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45821044</link><dc:creator>piltboy</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45821044</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45821044</guid></item></channel></rss>