<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: piphf</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=piphf</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 07:40:54 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=piphf" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by piphf in "Reverse-Engineering WebAssembly [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>WebAssembly is not "simple to work with", especially when it comes to analyzing non-trivial, large, optimized programs. The tool [1] generates a one-by-one equivalence of wasm instructions to C code. I guess you could qualify that as a "decompiler", but real decompilers - the ones used for malware analysis such as JEB or IDA - are optimizing decompilers that provide an output of higher level (eg more legible) than the input disassembly/binary.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Jul 2018 15:44:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17515705</link><dc:creator>piphf</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17515705</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17515705</guid></item></channel></rss>