Most are closed systems. Water gets recycled. Water gets used like bathtubs and water bottles, right?

You cannot believe water is destroyed.

I grew up in a 700sqft home and now own a 1400sqft house and my friend is building a custom 4000sqft house. They both feel 'small' for different reasons.

The very rich I know have 2 or 3 homes, each >3000sqft.

The most wealthy people I know have a modest house on as many acres as they can get because no neighbors and gardens and horses and tractors are where the life is at.

The fish bowl theory is we grow to our environment. Look at the billionaires and their yachts, it is never enough.

Contentment must be learned. I am beyond content now while I could afford a house 2x the size.

While the company I am in is embracing AI the disconnect and delay between what is available and possible versus what is approved and permitted is a three month window. The State employees I speak to are just now getting around to writing their usage policies for internal AI usage.

Most of these inside thoughts are not well accepted in a diverse, multicultural, professional setting so they go unspoken.

I would also argue that the desire to remove 'them' is universal because of safety or desire. I think we disagree on the criteria which is really where the factions start their battle. Do we use criteria based upon belief, genetics, or agency?

I suspect any model connected or built by China will serve their interest despite their terms and agreements.

You can yell at a contractor or the mirror but there's a tax.

Death.

Repeat offenders, those who are violent, rape, or murder are removed forever from society. There is no reason for a rapist or thief to be permitted to murder after their 2nd 3rd, or 4th offense.

Locking away someone for a large portion of their life to deny them employment, rob them of education, limit their positive contributions, and subjecting their families to the inability to bring wholeness is unjust and unkind.

In addition to that, while yes, 4.6 and 5.0 can solve problems, they do so differently. Sometimes 5.0 does better by a wide margin but that would be expected as they are supposed to be better.

Ain't nobody anon anymore thanks to the image recording GPS radio in the pocket.

Config file requires being updated with 3rd party data that's 2k of lines.

It's selective edits so instead of me reading the file, selecting the parts, validating syntax, documenting changes that would take 30 minutes considering the complexity i have AI do the work, review, validate, generate tickets, create pull requests and in 2 minutes I'm done.

I am not a developer although I have written production code but that's not what I am talking about.

I know for a fact that I can do a task in a week. It may take 12 or 40 hours but it'll be done in a week. Now with AI? I can get that task done in a day. Anywhere from 3-12 hours.

Prompt was "read and update the config file with new data". This work on 4.6 takes <2 minutes to read the file, parse the new data, and patch.

Opus 5 Result: 43 minutes of pulling containers, running sandboxes, creating testing suites, which included evaluating the entire repo beyond the scope of the config file.

Both: one file modification

The [Company] apologizes.