IIRC Asahi has finally acquired Thunderbolt support but that support still doesn't have the pieces needed for external displays.

(IIRC It’s possible that a super-deterministic hidden variable system could explain Aspect’s results. But that pretty much requires the universe to deliberately plot against you, which seems very unlikely.)

You can entangle two particles in QM, separate them by light years & when you measure the state of one of them you will instantaneously determine the state of the second one, no matter how far away it is. But you cannot transfer information by doing so - information must plod along at light speed between the two.

This looks like a bug in PHP’s assembly of multipart responses & you can feed one of those to the PHP backend with a simple web request, no auth required I think.

He’s like an incompetent Cassandra: people keep on agreeing with his diagnoses, giving him power in the hope that he’ll fix things at which point he makes a complete hash of everything and leaves in a huff having made things worse than they were before.

If the right ever takes power in the UK in the near-ish future I expect us to go through exactly this cycle again. Cummings seems to be very bad at the politics of driving organisational change & making it stick, which is ironic given that criticising public bodies is what he spends so much of his time doing.

One of those times when you do have to ask “who exactly thought this was a good idea?”

(I presume the picofly & similar devices are just doing this automatically so you can boot the hardware under user control without requiring other hardware to make the exploit work?)

Try the same prompt with a larger quant (even if it runs very slowly because the model no longer fits in VRAM) & see if Qwen does better - if so, there’s your answer.

It's interesting that what I meant as a purely factual question with no prejudice either way has been taken by almost everyone to be explicitly negative & critical.

I need to be a tad less blunt I guess if I don't want to

https://icfpcontest2026.com/

linked from here: https://x.com/b_shrir/status/2079094004885668003?s=20

Very short version: there’s an existing false counterexample in the literature which holds almost everywhere except at a pole. It looks like Fable used this polynomial as a base & extended it in a way that eliminated the pole whilst preserving the structure.

He may talk about their other funds in other videos, but not this one.

As far as I can tell the straightforward US & world equity ETFs I’m referring to above don’t have this value bias.

  https://www.dimensional.com/us-en/funds/dfus/us-equity-market-etf

(I have no relationship with Dimensional, nor do I invest in these funds - I just saw them mentioned in a YT video on this topic a few months ago: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mqIHa6URUPk )

I presume Apple knew perfectly well but wanted the halo product to sell to those people who will always pay extra for the perceived “top of the line” product. Once Intel branding had created an i9 that was a bigger number than an i7, then Apple was going to sell it.

It was faster than the i7 after all: just not for very long!

My entirely speculative theory is that the poor thermal characteristics of that era of Intel CPUs didn’t really become apparent until quite late in the development process & by that point Apple had probably committed to buying a fair chunk of Intel’s output.

Intel really made themselves unpopular with Apple during that period.