<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: pkcoskfiwjfj</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=pkcoskfiwjfj</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 08 May 2026 13:40:07 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=pkcoskfiwjfj" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pkcoskfiwjfj in "The Burning Man MOOP Map"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Now this is some next-level “I didn’t read the article, have no context, and understand little to nothing about the subject matter” type of comment. I’m actually impressed.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 16:32:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48051421</link><dc:creator>pkcoskfiwjfj</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48051421</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48051421</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pkcoskfiwjfj in "Photoshop's challenges with focus, pt. 2"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Clearly broken and unfinished modals such as those in the blog post don’t require much more than a couple of devs to fix, and yet this behaviour is still present in the latest version shipped to customers.<p>I find it hard to believe that the team is “working hard” to gain consensus on how best to move forward when such simple things make it to production.<p>Does anyone at Adobe ACTUALLY use Photoshop? Didn’t anyone stop for a moment to think that shipping in such a taste was a terrible idea?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 15:57:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050975</link><dc:creator>pkcoskfiwjfj</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050975</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050975</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pkcoskfiwjfj in "Photoshop's challenges with focus, pt. 2"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yeah, but there’s a world of difference between “not perfect” and “we rounded a few sliders, and now the modal is a nightmare to use”.<p>Rolling out a new UI for such a staple piece of software is smart. But doing it the way they are doing is absurd. Why even release it when you have basically nothing to show besides a broken modal, rounded sliders and a couple things made thicker? That’s not being mindful, that’s just someone’s unfinished staging build that got pushed to production by mistake. It’s insane that they’re doing this to Photoshop (of all apps). And honestly, quite insaner that anyone would defend anything from Adobe after all the crap they’ve pulled (and continue to pull) over the years.<p>They are wrong. They are going about it the wrong way. And paying customers deserve a hell of a lot more. Adobe OWES us a better treatment. Big time.<p>And unfortunately Photoshop very much is the monopoly many think it is. Those complaining about Photoshop being hobbled because it can’t hallucinate AI slop are not Adobe’s target audience and main source of income. Adobe’s only as crap as it is now exactly because it knows it holds basically the entire graphic design industry in a stranglehold. No other apps are currently even close to Adobe’s in terms of compatibility, functionality and support—unfortunately. I wish someone would come and claim Adobe’s crown, but that is simply not happening.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 15:44:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050792</link><dc:creator>pkcoskfiwjfj</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050792</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050792</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pkcoskfiwjfj in "Photoshop's challenges with focus, pt. 2"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Adobe’s too busy trying to come up with ways to trap paying customers while riding the AI wave to care.<p>Every single one of its apps is a mess, currently. Their UIs are wildly different even when doing similar or identical things. Icons for equal functions differ between apps. Keyboard shortcuts that should be global, or at least the same between apps, are wildly different as well. Apps consume so much RAM when doing basically nothing it’s actually ridiculous.<p>Adobe is a complete mess.<p>It’s even funnier to see the “Principal Scientist for this UI effort” show up here, and with all due respect to them: someone’s not doing their job right over there. No one cares how many UI scientists, researchers or engineers you have if what you ship to PAYING customers of your VERY expensive piece of software is unfinished, barely thought out, untested crap.<p>Fix it. And fix it properly.<p>This “modern UI” of yours has absolutely nothing modern, updated or visibly useful in it. It was clearly made just so your AI functions could be better integrated into the existing UI, but rounding a few sliders and making hue strips thicker a modern UI does not make.<p>Just freaking fix it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2026 15:31:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050644</link><dc:creator>pkcoskfiwjfj</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050644</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48050644</guid></item></channel></rss>