<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: pogeys</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=pogeys</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2026 17:44:46 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=pogeys" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pogeys in "Why is homeschooling becoming fashionable?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> suddenly teaching about the Tulsa Race Massacre or how banks used to discriminate against minorities for lending is considered extremism and "woke".<p>No, these things were taught to me in school and I’ve never heard anyone consider historical facts like this to be CRT except people railing against conservatives (ironically demonstrating their own ignorance of what CRT is).<p>What’s problematic about CRT is its postmodern view that liberalism is inadequate (or worse) at eliminating racism; downplaying objectivity in favor of “lived experience” that can supposedly never be truly understood by white people; rejecting colorblindness out of hand; advocating segregation of minorities in the name of “safe spaces”; regularly and unscientifically trumpeting the existence and scope of unconscious bias; emphasizing intersectionality to the point of essentialism.<p>The famous Smithsonian “Assumptions of Whiteness” infographic (<a href="https://www.newsweek.com/smithsonian-race-guidelines-rational-thinking-hard-work-are-white-values-1518333" rel="nofollow">https://www.newsweek.com/smithsonian-race-guidelines-rationa...</a>) is an example of these concepts infesting a mainstream cultural educational entity. There’s room to critique current racial discourse and advocate for changing models, but to state that the scientific method and “objective, rational linear thinking” are white values, implying that whites have a monopoly on science or that minorities are less capable at it, is obviously derived from critical theory, and is (I think unquestionably) horrifically racist. When there is any sign of these viewpoints seeping from higher academia into elementary schools, it’s perfectly natural for parents to become concerned.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2025 17:10:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42700212</link><dc:creator>pogeys</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42700212</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42700212</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pogeys in "A man has been swatted 47 times for making a joke about Norm Macdonald"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Just two days ago there was a story about FinCEN requiring more information to be gathered and stored about the owners of LLCs, and the comment section had quite some discussion from people shocked that anyone would feel a need for privacy in home records. <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39304312">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39304312</a><p>How do we stop swatting? Maybe improved technical means for identifying false calls, maybe better judgment by law enforcement of what situations are dangerous, maybe stronger investigation and punishment of the callers.<p>But what can <i>I</i> do <i>right now</i> to keep me at lower risk of swatting? I can go the extreme privacy route, form shell corporations to own my assets without publicly associating them to my identity, and stripping out my info from as many data brokers as possible. That's hard, but it's doable for the upper middle class like many of us in tech.<p>I would love for it not to be necessary, and I'd love for these measures to be more accessible to people with less money than me. But I'm gonna keep taking these measures wherever I can.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 11 Feb 2024 03:45:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39332490</link><dc:creator>pogeys</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39332490</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=39332490</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pogeys in "George Orwell Complete Works"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Orwell should not be treated like a saint who cannot be criticized.<p>Quite a strawman, since nobody here has suggested he <i>should</i> be treated like a saint.<p>On the other hand, your link practically portrays Orwell to be the devil himself (and Stalin to be Not So Bad, Really).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2023 05:32:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37565932</link><dc:creator>pogeys</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37565932</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37565932</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pogeys in "RetroAchievements: Adding achievements to retro games"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Another bad style of achievements: RNG-heavy.<p>For instance, to get the “catch shiny Pokémon” achievements in Pokémon Crystal (<a href="https://retroachievements.org/game/11841" rel="nofollow noreferrer">https://retroachievements.org/game/11841</a>), you have 1/8192 odds on encounter… for <i>each</i> Pokémon, and there are 213 of them.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 13 Sep 2023 05:39:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37492623</link><dc:creator>pogeys</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37492623</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=37492623</guid></item></channel></rss>