[1]: https://github.com/prashnts/betty-epd/blob/master/notebooks/...

For one it can adequately show if your WiFi is performing well...

In a home network setting I've got a UDP display sink (64x64px, RGB) with a custom protocol. It works fine-- no hard number as the performance varies based on other factors, including congestion. I've been able to push it to >90fps, but around 42fps there is virtually no flicker.

For context in my protocol I use all 512bytes, with 3 first being the "line number and such" data and the rest containing ~128 pixels.

Of course this is a can of worms for a product because we can still not guarantee accuracy.

A quick enhancement you can add, which will help mobile users, is adding appropriate touch specifiers to the element. Currently I am unable to drag the pen to draw -- the whole page moves. By fixing that, I should also be able to use my Apple Pencil.

Specifically, this page describes it better: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/CSS/touch-actio...

I intend to use system python there but previously poetry will simply crash the whole Pi while installing itself.

I'm sure I'd more code than what's in my 8yo repo, but the premise is simply https://github.com/prashnts/midipacks/blob/master/midipacks/...

But I do understand what you mean. I guess one thing to do is to set the router to not broadcast at full power, and use 5GHz to limit the range.

I'd crudely deduct that being takers/givers in a conversation may be a function of cultural, linguistic, social, and intellectual dimensions coupled with personal, emotional, and ambient states a person is in.

As such there's really very little just one party can do to have a better conversation flowing on their own. So apart from affordance, I think participation seems to also be a key factor and can be seen as "push or pull or slide" aspect of that doorknob.

The advantage I think with their products is that you only need to connect wires in general -- soldering and stuff is optional. They have good UI on hardware, and even include touchscreens, buttons and so on.

I think it will meet your "mostly fun" for sure!

Technically it's not Arduino in a sense that they mostly use ESP chips (not AVR), which is supported by Arduino IDE.

The homepage has good pictures if you want to get an idea: https://m5stack.com/

(Not shilling :) Just really like their products!)

For a comparable option, consider one of the Pi-Picos, Arduinos with VUSB, or a USB-Serial board with extra GPIOS.

So I've been into "connector technologies" (if that's a thing) for a while -- more specifically I really admire the simplicity of edge connectors that nowadays are basically free (except the higher amount of metal than traces, (gold?) plating etc.). Anything you'd like to add about these sort of connectors from this era? Were they reliable in mating-cycle sense? Could you just casually insert them or was there a specific process? Was there a standard?

As you can see I don't have a precise question, I'm looking more towards the considerations that an engineer at that time would have to take into account. Unfortunately it's not very easy to google this these days.