<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: prieveschl</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=prieveschl</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 10:26:52 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=prieveschl" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by prieveschl in "Creating West Coast Buddhism (2024)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thanks, I’ll have to give him a read. This concept of self and our our urgent obsession with the subjective experience is indeed a junk heap of ideas we’ve picked up along the way, or machines of reason and identity we’ve cobbled from the misguided cogs adopted in its construction or foisted upon us from others trying to make sense of their own jumbled notions of who they are.  The more I ruminate on exactly who this self is - is it my consciousness, a figment of imagination, a device to escape entropy, a receptor pulling down from some universal wellspring, a support system designed to merely keep the flesh animated and alive, an adversary we concoct to challenge preconception and spur our continual evolution - the closer I approach a territory where the self no longer serves a purpose, at least not in the way I always thought it must, and that simply being is the most honest manifestation of this thing we call enlightenment.  Being without a need to understand the self, to live in the vast unknowing, and truly be ok with that.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2026 05:04:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47623351</link><dc:creator>prieveschl</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47623351</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47623351</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by prieveschl in "Creating West Coast Buddhism (2024)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Indeed the ego and its power to drive advancement can be forces for good, and your example of this chat is a perfect one.  How amazing we get to share POVs from across the globe in seconds, hopefully broadening our own and anyone who looks in’s horizons of understanding and ultimately truth (whatever that means).  But this “hard” problem of consciousness seems to always get in the way of my understanding of the concept of enlightenment.  I try to see it in the word, enlightenment - to lighten the weight of - and perhaps view it as a moment to moment practice of continually lightening the ever-present load of suffering, ego, and consciousness.  Be here we are again, up against the hard problem, a metacognizant trying to use the mind to describe the process of getting around the mind.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2026 17:53:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47591091</link><dc:creator>prieveschl</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47591091</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47591091</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by prieveschl in "Creating West Coast Buddhism (2024)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Correct, my bad, I should have said “many”, not “every”.  Thanks for the correction!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2026 21:40:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47567638</link><dc:creator>prieveschl</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47567638</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47567638</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by prieveschl in "Reddit will require "fishy" accounts to verify they are run by a human"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Humans will always have this problem, though, in the digital domain.  There has to be some way of proving you’re a human digitally, before any trust can be built.  It’s a paradox, for sure, but if not ID verification for proof of humanness, then what?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2026 21:34:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47567591</link><dc:creator>prieveschl</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47567591</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47567591</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by prieveschl in "Creating West Coast Buddhism (2024)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This was a great article, thanks so much for sharing. As a buddhist who started in Tibetan Vajrayana as a teenager and has ended up chanting NMRK in the SGI, I can appreciate that faith, like human beings, adapts to its time and surroundings.  While personal gain and financial enrichment and the like have infected almost every faith there is on earth (we are all fallible to some extent) the through line of an ever-narrowing compression of practice makes sense on the pursuit of enlightenment.  And, while study is essential in any pursuit of the mind, the mind is sometimes our biggest adversary.<p>Here is what I wrestled with for years, and I think it’s worth sharing because I suspect some of you have wrestled with it too.<p>Every Buddhist tradition agrees that all living beings possess Buddha nature. The Lotus Sutra’s parable of the Jewel in the Robe says it plainly: you already have a priceless jewel sewn into your clothing. You always have. You just don’t know it’s there. Enlightenment isn’t something you earn or achieve. It’s something you already are.<p>So if that’s true — if the jewel is already there — why is it so hard to find? And this is where I kept getting stuck. Because the tool we use to look for the jewel is the same tool that hides it from us. Our consciousness. Our thinking, analyzing, questioning mind. The very thing that makes us human is also the thing that stands between us and what every tradition says is our birthright. Each school of Buddhism is, in its own way, a set of gymnastics designed to get the mind out of its own way. Zen tries to crash it with paradox. Tibetan practice tries to transmute its energy. Pure Land tries to exhaust it into surrender. And each one works, for some people, some of the time. But the fundamental problem remains: you cannot use the mind to escape the mind.<p>This is the contradiction I brought with me to Nichiren Buddhism. And to be honest, I found the same contradiction here, stated more plainly. We say that a single sincere recitation of Nam-myoho-renge-kyo contains the entirety of Buddhahood within it. And I believe that. But we also say: don’t stop chanting. Keep going. Practice daily. Because your delusions will reassert themselves by tomorrow morning.<p>So which is it? Is one moment enough, or isn’t it?<p>The contradiction dissolves when you stop thinking of practice as a means to an end and start seeing it as living itself. Each breath you take is a complete act. No single breath is insufficient. But you keep breathing — not because the last breath failed, but because you’re alive and that’s what living things do. Each moment of chanting or meditating, each act of compassion, each time you turn toward someone else’s suffering instead of away from it — that’s not a step on the path to enlightenment. It is enlightenment, expressed through action.<p>Kierkegaard wrote that life can only be understood backwards, but it must be lived forwards. Perhaps that’s why Pure Land buddhists seek this fundamental meaning at the time of death, that that is when enlightenment will reveal itself.  But remember the jewel?  It’s right there, any moment you honestly reach for it.<p>Thank you again for this fantastic perspective on the trajectory of this universal search for truth!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2026 21:13:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47567384</link><dc:creator>prieveschl</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47567384</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47567384</guid></item></channel></rss>