<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: privacythrow1</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=privacythrow1</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 20:17:29 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=privacythrow1" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by privacythrow1 in "Tell HN: Salary data is for sale"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In my case, the number was completely unrecognizable to me, and then I was subsequently locked out of the account...<p>So either the site is broken and leaking information, or someone has already laid claim to my access.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 08 Jan 2022 02:32:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29848012</link><dc:creator>privacythrow1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29848012</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29848012</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by privacythrow1 in "The 'Fuck You' Pattern"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Maybe I attribute too much value to the costs of physical distribution. Either way, my point is that I don't think in-app advertising is the sole driver of the price point we see for Windows today compared to the price point we saw in the 90s.<p>I find it hard to accept the explanation that in-app advertising is the tradeoff I get when buying a tech product at a given price. Either it's free and it serves me ads, or I pay for it and I get to opt-in to ads if I choose.<p>It's the same argument for Smart TVs. These companies know they can have their cake and eat it too.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 30 Jun 2021 00:53:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27683691</link><dc:creator>privacythrow1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27683691</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27683691</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by privacythrow1 in "The 'Fuck You' Pattern"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Certainly the costs in the 90s were tied directly to physical distribution and comparatively lesser market demand. Whereas nowadays digital distribution is king and market demand is ubiquitous. I'd consider those factors to be responsible for driving prices down before I'd give a multinational corporation credit for allowing me to use their product (that I paid for) in return for pervasive advertising.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 29 Jun 2021 02:46:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27671132</link><dc:creator>privacythrow1</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27671132</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=27671132</guid></item></channel></rss>