I wonder how its performance is on dense models.

And near the end, that bubbly euphoric/revelatory ascending arpeggio was a common motif.

Additive inking works pretty well. As long as I am adding black ink to the page, everything is responsive. But if I want to push other updates asynchronously, or (god forbid) erase something, then there is the danger of clobbering the user's inkwork. I don't have any deep insights here, beyond waiting for human confirmation before updating anything.

I wonder if it is possible to detect when the pen tip has "left" the proximity of the page? If I knew this, I'd know when it was safe to update the UI.

I have decided not to use any scrolling at all. I am paginating everything and positioning input areas near the vertical middle of the device for comfort.

Effectively system instructions and server-side prompts are red, whereas user input is normal text.

It would have to be trained from scratch on a meticulous corpus which never crosses the line. I wonder if the resulting model would be easier to guide and less susceptible to prompt injection.

The fan increases air speed at the centre of the rotor, creating a low pressure zone which then sucks in surrounding air. So it helps to place the fan away from the window (roughly far enough that the wind cone "fits" the opening).