If you reduce your consumption the cost of oil will fall towards the cost of production and middle/low income countries would consume it.

The only way someone in a high income country can prevent this is to buy oil and permanently bury it.

For every ton of CO2 that the west has reduced in the past decade China has produced three tons of CO2.[1]

We need another breakthrough on the scale of the Haber process.

[1] https://ourworldindata.org/explorers/co2?country=OWID_WRL~Hi...

The chart in this wiki article is really good at showing the various effects.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychrometrics

> Mostly married with low credit limits and high utilization rates. These customers may benefit from tools and programs to manage their credit usage.

> Mostly single women with low c redit limits and high utilization rates. Offering credit management tools and financial literacy programs could be valuable for this group.

this is supposedly from the formaldehyde

That's almost certainly the answer to the headline.

That's pretty good.

This is technically but not usefully true with most videos on the web today.

The video decode itself is accelerated, but each frame passes through JavaScript to be composited.

The only time video is fully hardware decoded is when it's a simple video element to a static video file.

Many Americans have professional business relationships with people whom they vehemently oppose politically.

Politics is simply bad for business.

There's billions of people on earth who are desperately poor compared to even the poorest American.

There is absolutely no chance those people just accept their position as ultra poor.

If individuals want to reduce their CO2 output the only viable strategy is to buy and permanently store fossil fuels.

To offset global human CO2 production you'd need to biochar all plant matter several times a year.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gallium_arsenide#GaAs_advantag...