Servilo, the tool that serves something.

Servulo, someone who serves something.

Servanto, some agent (in grammatical sense, so very broadly applicable) which serves something.

Servisto, some professional serving something.

--

That's a big tangential to TFA though, add other noted it suffers from wording ambiguity that don't need any other language to be dispelled. Compare for example "Dæmons dwells on phone now", just as short, far less ambiguity.

Haydn to Leopold, 1785

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Haydn_and_Mozart#The_%22Haydn%...

That would also make a great description for human societies, wouldn't it?

Actually, after second thought, actually LLMs at least give the surface level impression, which might not be exactly the case for humanity at the moment.

Ok, sarcasm apart, I'm fine with LLM at the moment as a technology. How we use it, what impact it has on society is certainly more of a concern than the technology itself. Compared to weapons, at least they're not fundamentally designed specifically to harm and threat.

As an European citizen living in Europe, definitely yes it is, and not only for the "mere" censorship factor. Maybe not yet as down the road and maybe not going as fast as US. But that’s not something that one can really be content of.

Because country as an entity is a mental construction for which "interest" is a categorical error. It’s certainly a useful concept, but pretending it has interests like some human individual can have have interests. Sure it can serve as rhetorical facility to sell some arguments.

Countries don’t have interests. Some people willing to take control of other people encompassed in that "country" groups have interests, and they don’t necessarily align with best interests of everyone or even majority in each of these groups.

Of course even disregarding this fact, this is utterly disgusting attack on humanity heritage, just as much as any group out there destroying what we should all cherish be it for the historical artifact they represent. Whatever how US judge name it, they don’t worth more than their same-behavior consorts that is terrorists and totalitarian governments.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Palimpsest

https://organiser.org/2025/07/24/304285/world/china-wages-wa...

https://www.historyexpose.com/things/demolition-afghanistans...

https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-031-96432-9_...

And let’s imagine if LLM bots could do that as well, without any human caring to type the actual messages, just orchestrating the bot fleet. What trust could be we put in such a brainless peace of publications?

How enthusiast are most professional to throw money at "smart" tools, hmm?

Hackers are often exceptionally good at optimizing the hidden parts no one give a shit until everything crumble under systemic slowness, but they often also are very bad at designing even a decent UX for everything else regarding in-your-face aspects.

Sure, where would be biological lifeforms today if hadn’t been driven by some visionary leaders. Ooops? But I mean, now that humanity provide great leaders, biosphere is thriving like never before. Reooops?

https://www.worldometers.info/world-population/population-by...

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rocq

Generated tests can help, and if we go into that direction we can now certainly afford to introduce more proven code (Lean/Roq/Frama-C…), but that will still not be wild reality proof until it faces the whole user base and their widely different environments.

And large load of code is still large load of code.

As noise. The fact it's xenophobic or some other kind of noise is just implementation details at that level.