For family? Not really

I prefer to not give to even more people.

In the same way as my doctor knowns some private health info but to keep it private I would prefer to not give it to my employer.

I prefer to not give to even more people.

And at least mention terms you used.

And at least mention terms you used.

That would be asking to drop all regulations.

I am saying that regulations have cost so you should have as little as regulation as possible to achieve wanted effect.

And wanted effect often should not be literally zero of accidents or bribery or corruption. As it may be either impossible to achieve or extra side effects not worth it past certain point.

In other words minimisation of how much regulations you have should be one of targets.

This applies also to enacting monstrously stupid regulations. Or even ones that were introduced entirely as revenge or to create opportunity for corruption.

Also that. But overregulation makes too hard for others to compete and offer cheaper insulin.

If neither you not anyone else can fix it, without more cost than making a proper one?

this would be going against

> 'we need less regulation' is never the right answer

I just throw them away with rubbish and get less supportive of people and institutions that created this law.