<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: pushcx</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=pushcx</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2026 02:07:06 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=pushcx" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pushcx in "The redistribution of housing wealth caused by rent control [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The stock market has liquidity, fungibility, low transaction costs, etc etc. <a href="https://jlcollinsnh.com/2013/05/29/why-your-house-is-a-terrible-investment/" rel="nofollow">https://jlcollinsnh.com/2013/05/29/why-your-house-is-a-terri...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2026 03:37:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48523959</link><dc:creator>pushcx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48523959</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48523959</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pushcx in "Did Claude increase bugs in rsync?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thanks, I appreciate you sorting out the timeline on such a heated issue.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2026 17:38:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48464509</link><dc:creator>pushcx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48464509</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48464509</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pushcx in "Did Claude increase bugs in rsync?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p><p><pre><code>    What followed was extraordinary: 329 comments and counting, ranging from thoughtful concern to outright harassment.
    The thread did not stop at words. One user posted My Little Pony drawings of themselves strangling the "project janitor that pushed vibecoded commits":
    It spread to Hacker News and Lobsters, generating hundreds more comments.
</code></pre>
This is false, it did not appear on Lobsters. Here is the function in the codebase that prohibits this kind of brigading: <a href="https://github.com/lobsters/lobsters/blob/main/app/models/story.rb#L371-L407" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/lobsters/lobsters/blob/main/app/models/st...</a><p>Please correct your article.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 14:40:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48413203</link><dc:creator>pushcx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48413203</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48413203</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pushcx in "Social Animus"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> when I saw someone complain about what he thought the title should be, I just used his idea instead of my own. This upset the moderator so much when he saw that I was optimizing my writing style based on feedback from his site<p>I was unaware the blog copied my title change until seeing this on HN and I have no emotional reaction to it. I've replaced over a hundred clickbait titles and it's not an emotionally evocative chore. Anyone can read my contemporaneous explanation at <a href="https://lobste.rs/c/hjlmw1" rel="nofollow">https://lobste.rs/c/hjlmw1</a> to see my reasoning and judge for themself how upset I sound.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 21:44:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315955</link><dc:creator>pushcx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315955</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48315955</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pushcx in "AMD pulls a bait-and-switch on Linux users with Vivado licensing changes"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This title and premise are incorrect. It's not a bait-and-switch unless the bait was unavailable: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bait-and-switch" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bait-and-switch</a> Vivado really was available free. There's a lot of potential criticisms one could write of the decision to change that (and basically all of them were made in this and the previous thread), but bait-and-switch is not one of them.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2026 18:32:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48313399</link><dc:creator>pushcx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48313399</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48313399</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pushcx in "Ghostty is leaving GitHub"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> "GitHub only gets better if people who give a shit stick around to make it better"<p>What's the mechanism of action here? What changes if I stay? What changes if I give more or less of a shit? Is there javascript telemetry feeding my shit into a dashboard with a calibrated shitometer for executives to consult when they set quarterly objectives? My account is six weeks younger than mitchellh's and I've been watching GitHub fall apart for the last year, what will happen because I stick around to watch for another year? Besides that I will get covered in shit.<p>You're an employee. What changes if you stick around? Back in October 2025, the GitHub CTO Federov prioritized moving to Azure above feature work (<a href="https://thenewstack.io/github-will-prioritize-migrating-to-azure-over-feature-development/" rel="nofollow">https://thenewstack.io/github-will-prioritize-migrating-to-a...</a>). Yesterday he recommitted to it (<a href="https://github.blog/news-insights/company-news/an-update-on-github-availability/" rel="nofollow">https://github.blog/news-insights/company-news/an-update-on-...</a>), writing "We started executing our plan to increase GitHub’s capacity by 10X in October 2025 with a goal of substantially improving reliability and failover." GitHub has had six bad months of increasing bugs and sharply decreased uptime, and the CTO just recommitted to staying the course. You've explicitly been directed to move to Azure, not to give a shit or to make things better.<p>So I'll defer to your direct expertise. From the outside, Heroku stalled and died because Salesforce prioritized everything else in its business above Heroku. Are GitHub's priorities so different? Does you giving a shit make Azure and Copilot the best top priorities for GitHub? Will Azure and Copilot be why I stop seeing SPA jank? Will Azure and Copilot be why I can see my list of open PRs? Will Azure and Copilot be why I see something more than the 500 unicorn? Will Azure and Copilot stop the spam PRs that want to undermine the quality of my code? Will Azure and Copilot lead to anything other than the same corporate dismissal and dysfunction that led to Heroku? Will you giving a shit matter?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 01:07:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47942978</link><dc:creator>pushcx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47942978</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47942978</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pushcx in "Backpacks got worse on purpose"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is a little late for your nice jacket, but a lot of zipper damage comes from dirt getting into the teeth and then the zip grinds everything up. Outdoors shops sell a zipper lubricant to keep the dirt from sticking.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 15:53:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47780894</link><dc:creator>pushcx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47780894</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47780894</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pushcx in "Ageless Linux – Software for humans of indeterminate age"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There's a lobbying group called 5rights that has designed and promoted the UK OSA, AU OSA, California KOSA, Federal KOSA, and more. This isn't some conspiracy. They take proudly take credit for these bills on their website, and in news coverage you'll see their same couple media personalities over and over: <a href="https://5rightsfoundation.com/our-work/" rel="nofollow">https://5rightsfoundation.com/our-work/</a><p>As usual for online censorship, Techdirt has had excellent coverage for years: <a href="https://www.techdirt.com/tag/baroness-beeban-kidron/" rel="nofollow">https://www.techdirt.com/tag/baroness-beeban-kidron/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2026 12:27:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47386744</link><dc:creator>pushcx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47386744</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47386744</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pushcx in "Returning to Rails in 2026"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Rails's public release was July 2004: <a href="https://rubytalk.org/t/ann-rails-0-5-0-the-end-of-vaporware/12744" rel="nofollow">https://rubytalk.org/t/ann-rails-0-5-0-the-end-of-vaporware/...</a><p>Django's was July 2005: <a href="https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2005/jul/15/chipy/" rel="nofollow">https://www.djangoproject.com/weblog/2005/jul/15/chipy/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2026 12:36:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47349737</link><dc:creator>pushcx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47349737</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47349737</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pushcx in "Designing the Perfect ID: Marrying UUIDv7, Stripe Prefixes, and ULID"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>TypeID is similar, though it uses the UUIDv7 directly: <a href="https://github.com/jetify-com/typeid" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/jetify-com/typeid</a> Maybe the formalization would be interesting to you.<p>It doesn't have a checksum, though, that seems like an improvement that's worth a few bytes.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2026 03:41:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47242772</link><dc:creator>pushcx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47242772</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47242772</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pushcx in "How the Lobsters front page works"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don't know why you think I want a "technical win" from you, but I'm not seeking your approval. I corrected your mistake about the URL and the policy, like I corrected the author's mistake about what I removed. If you and other sites prefer different policies, it's no skin off my nose.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 21:55:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46698249</link><dc:creator>pushcx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46698249</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46698249</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pushcx in "How the Lobsters front page works"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The link was <a href="https://effective-haskell.com/" rel="nofollow">https://effective-haskell.com/</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 20 Jan 2026 15:40:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46692961</link><dc:creator>pushcx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46692961</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46692961</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pushcx in "How the Lobsters front page works"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You got a DM and email with the title and URL when your story was removed. This would've been 2023-08-03 with the subject "Your story has been edited by a moderator", if you want to look back: <a href="https://github.com/lobsters/lobsters/blob/86e1d0b6ac6bac52103cb82c9ca83810a4b829e2/app/models/moderation.rb#L82" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/lobsters/lobsters/blob/86e1d0b6ac6bac5210...</a><p>But you're correct on the second part, there isn't a level of activity that entitles anyone to post a sales page with nothing to discuss on it. Your activity was taken into account, though. Typically if a new user's first activity is to post an ad I'll also ban the site or user. I understand the rules aren't as permissive as you wanted, but ads don't start good discussions.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 19 Jan 2026 14:41:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46679503</link><dc:creator>pushcx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46679503</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46679503</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pushcx in "How the Lobsters front page works"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You did not share a link to a blog post. The title was "Effective Haskell is a hands-on practical book way to learn Haskell. No math or formal CS needed" and it linked to the site advertising your book for sale.  I removed it because we don't get good discussions out of ads.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 18 Jan 2026 22:23:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46672772</link><dc:creator>pushcx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46672772</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46672772</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pushcx in "I'm Being Prosecuted for the Opposite of Insider Trading"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Left writes:<p>> The government’s position is that I should have known I couldn’t trade stocks I’d publicly praised—for some unspecified period of time. I didn’t lie, I simply traded too soon.<p>The criminal complaint is here, allegations begin on page 7: <a href="https://prod-i.a.dj.com/public/resources/documents/andrew-left-indictment07-26-2024.pdf" rel="nofollow">https://prod-i.a.dj.com/public/resources/documents/andrew-le...</a><p>The part Left seems to be responding to in his article is:<p>> defendant LEFT often built his positions using inexpensive, short-dated options contracts that would expire within zero to five trading days and submitted limit orders to close his positions as soon as the Targeted Security reached a certain price.<p>The generic term for the government's allegations is not "the opposite of insider trading", it is: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pump_and_dump" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pump_and_dump</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 17 Jan 2026 02:39:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46654774</link><dc:creator>pushcx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46654774</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46654774</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pushcx in "Show HN: DebtBomb – Make TODOs expire and automatically create Jira tickets"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There's a much higher-ROI way to encode these, write a test that checks the current date. Maybe a very large project would prefer not to fail everyone's build for it, but this is fine for a couple dozen developers.<p>Example: <a href="https://github.com/lobsters/lobsters/commit/9e99fbf1d3cc441e7a86e288d42cf7256558534e" rel="nofollow">https://github.com/lobsters/lobsters/commit/9e99fbf1d3cc441e...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 13 Jan 2026 18:07:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46605072</link><dc:creator>pushcx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46605072</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46605072</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pushcx in "Bison return to Illinois' Kane County after 200 years"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There's a couple dozen at Midewin, too: <a href="https://www.fs.usda.gov/r09/midewin/animals-plants/bison-project-homepage" rel="nofollow">https://www.fs.usda.gov/r09/midewin/animals-plants/bison-pro...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 04 Jan 2026 16:56:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46489778</link><dc:creator>pushcx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46489778</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46489778</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pushcx in "How we automated federal retirements"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It must be part of a larger marketing push; their boss(?) appeared on the Odd Lots podcast a couple days ago to talk about this work: <a href="https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/scott-kupors-new-plan-to-bring-tech-workers-into-the/id1056200096?i=1000742677639" rel="nofollow">https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/scott-kupors-new-plan-...</a> He spent a lot of time promoting this new National Design Studio's attempt to attract tech works for 2-year commitments to drop into existing orgs, which is basically how the 18F PIF program worked before it was dissolved earlier this year. Perhaps abruptly terminating a program to reinvent it from scratch six months later is very efficient.<p>18F: <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/18F" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/18F</a>
Overview of the related programs: <a href="https://willslack.com/pif-18f-usds/" rel="nofollow">https://willslack.com/pif-18f-usds/</a><p>(A warning about Odd Lots: the hosts never question or push back on people talking their book. This especially bad with politicians and political appointees, who are often very creative during their interviews.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2025 18:24:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46403932</link><dc:creator>pushcx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46403932</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=46403932</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pushcx in "You Don't Need Anubis"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The scrapers will not attempt to discover and use an efficient representation. They will attempt to hit every URL they can discover on a site, and they'll do it at a rate of hundreds of hits per second, from enough IPs that each only requests at a rate of 1/minute. It's rude to talk down to people for not implementing a technique that you can't get scrapers to adopt, and for matching their investment in performance to their needs instead of accurately predicting years beforehand that traffic would dramatically change.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 02 Nov 2025 14:37:41 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45790625</link><dc:creator>pushcx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45790625</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45790625</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pushcx in "Luau's performance"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Asking as a newbie in this area, could you share any pointers to language design for performance?<p>I'm aware of the early difference between compiled and interpreted languages. Luau has to be interpreted to meet its security goals, and I'm asking with similar goals in mind, so I guess I'm starting from that significant limitation.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Oct 2025 19:21:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45706295</link><dc:creator>pushcx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45706295</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45706295</guid></item></channel></rss>