You seem to have the same bug I had when I first implemented https://screaming.saej.in/

In Firefox, scrollWidth includes spaces that extend into the margin, so it's possible for text to fit perfectly on the screen, but scrollWidth > clientWidth. Fix here https://saej.in/posts/screaming/

No one asked, but I'll analyze the differences between these two situations. Landis didn't impersonate any living people. It wasn't done against a backdrop of living people losing their jobs. What he made was still art, in that it was both a display of technical skill and worth discussion. Slop is neither. From now on, his forgeries will be clearly labeled as forgeries any time they're displayed. That's easy to do with a physical painting, but impossible when an image has been shared across platforms.

With AI, if you spend $X of tokens/developer time to find the first 2n most obvious security vulnerabilities, then attackers have to spend a proportionate amount to find one of the remaining ones.

https://www.vanettenlab.org/paulinella-consortium

1. be okay with sending their prompt to an AI company?

2. need to publish something AI generated?

As much as I hate it, I don't think we'll ever get a proof of the four color theorem that isn't enumerating cases.

When you have an integral or the sum of an infinite series that comes out to pi, you know there must be some satisfying explanation involving a circle.

Contrast with "Examples of patterns that eventually fail" on math stackexchange[^1]. When a pattern ends at 906150257, you don't really expect the proof for that to be something beautiful. The reason for the exact value of an upper bound is that it isn't smaller and it isn't bigger.

There's a relationship between e, i, pi, and -1 comes from a deeper relationship between complex numbers and rotation.

The relationship between planar graphs, vertex coloring, and 4 might just be because we put planar graphs and vertex coloring in the same room and 4 popped out, instead of 3 or 5.

[^1]: https://math.stackexchange.com/a/111461

If you're trying to fight scrapers on a small site, delay links can only flatten bursts. If bots can only scrape at human speed per IP, they can just scrape 100x as many sites at the same time. Once every bot operator does that, total traffic will return to the original level.

For completeness: To apply my original idea to R&W9 you would have 5 nodes labeled x, each with one arrow out, two nodes labeled x^2, each with no arrows in and one arrow out, one node labeled x^4 with no arrows in and one arrow out, one node labeled x^8 with no arrows in and one arrow out. Three missing mults, but way fewer crossings, not what you want.

When you have an integral or the sum of an infinite series that comes out to pi, you know there must be some satisfying explanation involving a circle.

Contrast with "Examples of patterns that eventually fail" on math stackexchange[^1]. When a pattern ends at 906150257, you don't really expect the proof for that to be something beautiful. The reason for the exact value of an upper bound is that it isn't smaller and it isn't bigger.

There's a relationship between e, i, pi, and -1 comes from a deeper relationship between complex numbers and rotation.

The relationship between planar graphs, vertex coloring, and 4 might just be because we put planar graphs and vertex coloring in the same room and 4 popped out, instead of 3 or 5.

[^1]: https://math.stackexchange.com/a/111461