<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: pwinnski</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=pwinnski</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 09:43:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=pwinnski" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pwinnski in "DeGoogling 2024: Replacing Photos, Gmail, and Search"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I appreciate these kinds of posts, and I've been semi-Degoogled for years now. What hasn't been easy for me to move away from so far is Docs/Sheets.<p>Apple's Numbers and Pages seem very far from ideal. Zoho didn't quite work for me. Maybe I should try Clickup.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Jun 2024 23:52:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40640691</link><dc:creator>pwinnski</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40640691</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=40640691</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pwinnski in "Anime Confronts a New Apocalypse"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's easy on the creators primarily, they get to skip a lot of steps and don't have to explain away things like cell phones.<p>For consumers, they get quantity.<p>Although it shouldn't be impossible, it seems really hard to get any kind of real quality out of isekai stories. Usually the stakes are low and the setting is surprisingly similar (even though having a different setting is ostensibly the entire reason for the genre). All you end up with is variety in characters, and even then there are common tropes.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 20:28:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35619583</link><dc:creator>pwinnski</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35619583</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35619583</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pwinnski in "Microsoft plugging more ads into Windows 11 Start Menu"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Of course! I don't disagree. And yet here we are at 69.43% desktop market share[0] for Windows for March 2023, decades after I started hearing about how this year, for sure, was going to be the Year Of Linux On The Desktop™.<p>Most people don't seem to be using the best possible desktop experience. Their desktop is decided by an employer, or whatever is pre-installed, or who knows what. But an ad in the start menu doesn't seem like it's likely to budge that number much.<p>0. <a href="https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share/desktop/worldwide/" rel="nofollow">https://gs.statcounter.com/os-market-share/desktop/worldwide...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 15:35:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35615414</link><dc:creator>pwinnski</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35615414</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35615414</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pwinnski in "Microsoft plugging more ads into Windows 11 Start Menu"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Most people will sign up for a Microsoft account, or already have, and so won't even see these ads.<p>But let's say you use Microsoft Windows, but don't want a Microsoft account. You're going to leave Windows over this? And go where?<p>Wait, is 2023 the fabled Year of Linux on the Desktop, at long last?<p>I haven't used Windows in many years, and I'm not trying to defend Microsoft here. Still, the framing of this piece seems silly. Very rarely is any single thing reason enough for the average person to completely switch operating systems. The cost of switching is too high.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 15:25:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35615231</link><dc:creator>pwinnski</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35615231</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35615231</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pwinnski in "The Cybertruck is years behind schedule, so Tesla is launching a $30 beer"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>And yet Duke Nukem Forever has shipped, and Cybertruck has not. So right now, today, at this moment, DNF is <i>not</i> vaporware, and Cybertruck is. This is true regardless of how one feels about it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 18 Apr 2023 04:16:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35609895</link><dc:creator>pwinnski</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35609895</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35609895</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pwinnski in "iOS 17 will reportedly set the stage for sideloading apps on iPhone"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Regulating data privacy isn't Apple's job, if you want that fixed then you should take it up with the government or someone who can actually hold them accountable.<p>I live in the United States of America, where the government is bought and paid for by companies who dislike privacy for their users.<p>In the meantime, it may not be Apple's "job," but it's part of their value proposition, and the grumbling from software vendors indicates it's reasonably effective.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2023 15:40:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35602383</link><dc:creator>pwinnski</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35602383</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35602383</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pwinnski in "iOS 17 will reportedly set the stage for sideloading apps on iPhone"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Because Facebook announced publicly that Apple's privacy policy changes would cost them $10 billion[0], putting them on the record as having strong motive to avoid the App Store.<p>0. <a href="https://www.cnbc.com/2022/02/02/facebook-says-apple-ios-privacy-change-will-cost-10-billion-this-year.html" rel="nofollow">https://www.cnbc.com/2022/02/02/facebook-says-apple-ios-priv...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2023 15:36:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35602337</link><dc:creator>pwinnski</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35602337</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35602337</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pwinnski in "iOS 17 will reportedly set the stage for sideloading apps on iPhone"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Think about it this way: any app that refuses to go through Apple's store is telling you that you're not a customer they want. If Facebook makes that choice, it's a great time to give up Facebook!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2023 15:33:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35602299</link><dc:creator>pwinnski</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35602299</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35602299</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pwinnski in "Apple Card’s new high-yield Savings account is now available, offering a 4.15 p"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, nobody is saying that Apple Card is the only card for everyone, just that it's a great card for tap-to-pay.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2023 15:30:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35602250</link><dc:creator>pwinnski</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35602250</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35602250</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pwinnski in "Apple Card’s new high-yield Savings account is now available, offering a 4.15 p"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>4.15% is lower than 4.81%, but how did you decided that UFB defines "current market rates?"<p>UFB, I note, does not offer a debit card.<p>4.15% is not the highest yield currently available, but it would put them fourth on this list[0] of ten, making them better than average even on that rarified list. This without fees or minimums, which would put them behind only Betterment, which is not a bank, but a brokerage account.<p>As always with an Apple offering, there are ways that some people under some circumstances can find better terms so long as they don't care about some of the benefits Apple is offering, but that's a very long way from "below current market rates," and comes from a company a lot of people are already trusting with their funds.<p>It's fine if you already have an account with UFB, carry on! And next month when it's a different company leading the pack, transfer. And the month after that, while Apple is still consistently in the top five.<p>0. <a href="https://www.investopedia.com/best-high-yield-savings-accounts-4770633" rel="nofollow">https://www.investopedia.com/best-high-yield-savings-account...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 17 Apr 2023 15:26:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35602186</link><dc:creator>pwinnski</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35602186</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35602186</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pwinnski in "The Coming of Local LLMs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That they're blocking tracking is still privacy-focused. There are unsubstantiated claims that they exempt themselves from the same tracking, but reports of their advertising revenue doesn't contribute anything to those claims.<p>At Apple's scale, it's relatively easy for them to deliver $20B in ad revenue without any privacy-invading means.<p>People seem to have forgotten, but ads used to be based on context, so people looking at apps related to fitness might see ads related to fitness, but that wouldn't follow them around when they looked at other things. Apple still seems to be doing that; I haven't seen fitness ads on games, or game ads on fitness apps.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 12 Apr 2023 18:23:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35544386</link><dc:creator>pwinnski</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35544386</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35544386</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pwinnski in "UK to be one of worst performing economies this year, predicts IMF"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm not sure the initial comment lends itself to that reading, but it isn't clear it lends itself to my initial response either, so I'll switch over to your more charitable reading. Thanks!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 20:34:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35531168</link><dc:creator>pwinnski</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35531168</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35531168</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pwinnski in "UK to be one of worst performing economies this year, predicts IMF"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Your contention is that any and all poor performance is due to the pandemic, not in any way related to Brexit?<p>I'm not sure 2022 looks quite as good as you're suggesting, but it's clear the pandemic had a profound impact, certainly.<p><a href="https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/nov/19/britain-economic-woes-europe-figures-uk-inflation" rel="nofollow">https://www.theguardian.com/business/2022/nov/19/britain-eco...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 20:12:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35530850</link><dc:creator>pwinnski</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35530850</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35530850</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pwinnski in "Heavy EVs Could Collapse Old Parking Garages: Report"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not <i>only</i> Tesla, though. My 2023 Chevy Bolt EUV is 1670 kg.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 18:27:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35529173</link><dc:creator>pwinnski</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35529173</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35529173</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pwinnski in "Heavy EVs Could Collapse Old Parking Garages: Report"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I just looked it up. My new EV weighs 3680 lbs[0], or 1670 kg, which seems to be below average[1].<p>I still pay nothing in gas taxes, the primary funding for road maintenance. That doesn't seem quite right. I'd be happy to pay an annual fee based on miles driven and weight class.<p>0. <a href="https://www.caranddriver.com/chevrolet/bolt-euv/specs" rel="nofollow">https://www.caranddriver.com/chevrolet/bolt-euv/specs</a><p>1. <a href="https://www.autolist.com/guides/average-weight-of-car" rel="nofollow">https://www.autolist.com/guides/average-weight-of-car</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 18:24:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35529117</link><dc:creator>pwinnski</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35529117</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35529117</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pwinnski in "The Coming of Local LLMs"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Apple has two values in conflict with each other, I think. On the one hand, they want to deliver best-in-class solutions. On the other hand, they have a commitment to user privacy[0] as perhaps only a gay man growing up in the south might value.<p>Siri should be better! It <i>lost</i> features post-acquisition by Apple, and it seems like user privacy is why.<p>Home automation is arguable. If you consider a single point of failure on a server somewhere to be bad, Apple's solution is pretty great. Their commitment to zigging where others zagged put them behind, since hardware vendors didn't want to put in powerful (expensive) enough chips to handle the cryptography, but while other companies go out of business, or transmit images and video to external parties, Apple's works reliably and securely.<p>Still, as with most of my complaints about Apple, it's a trade-off between privacy and functionality, and Apple will seemingly always choose privacy over functionality, even as Google consistently chooses functionality over privacy.<p>[0] Yes, there are examples of edge cases that suggest a less-than-perfect record. Contrast that with their competitors, for which invading privacy is foundational to the business model.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2023 17:53:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35528660</link><dc:creator>pwinnski</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35528660</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35528660</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pwinnski in "GPT-4 Is a Reasoning Engine"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> You believe human brains are special meat with super powers and silicon can't possibly think because it doesn't have a soul or some other new age BS.<p>I believe literally none of those things, and have explicitly stated the opposite of at least one of them on this page.<p>At this point I think an LLM would do a better job of responding to my comments, based on context and syntax alone.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 10 Apr 2023 16:31:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35514151</link><dc:creator>pwinnski</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35514151</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35514151</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pwinnski in "NPR won’t tweet from NPR until Twitter removes false “state-affiliated” label"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Anyone with any political opinions at all is ideologically aligned in that sense, making them ideologically affiliated with anyone sharing that alignment.<p>NPR, as it happens, has run many stories that seemed aligned with the right or the left, depending on the subject. They're generally pro-military and pro-wealth, while being against racism and censorship, so it's not as if they're either all left-wing or all right-wing.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2023 16:10:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35483224</link><dc:creator>pwinnski</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35483224</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35483224</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pwinnski in "NPR won’t tweet from NPR until Twitter removes false “state-affiliated” label"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You realize the label is applied by twitter, not the state department, right?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 07 Apr 2023 15:38:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35482780</link><dc:creator>pwinnski</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35482780</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35482780</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by pwinnski in "Is it my fault if you can't handle the truth? (2019)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In which case there's no reason to be unkind, either!<p>If you can communicate the truth with kindness and be heard, great. If not, move on.<p>In my experience, unkindness isn't any more effective than kindness in effecting change; it usually prompts defensiveness.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 06 Apr 2023 23:44:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35476114</link><dc:creator>pwinnski</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35476114</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=35476114</guid></item></channel></rss>