It's so sometimes just performative. I remember when Tailscale had a similar performative approach with 'just use a JSON file on disk'. Then etcd. Then SQLite. Like sure, you can keep picking the absolite mininum technology for your needs and then change it every couple of years... Or you could just immediately go with a solid Postgres (or Postgres-like setup, eg. yugabyte) and save yourself a bunch of faffing about with weird solutions and migrating between them. But I guess that doesn't drive engagement on your blog.

To be clear, I am also not an expert - I can pick out things that are wrong because I generally know a thing or two about semiconductor fabrication, but I'm not willing to sign-off on correctness of the whole thing, especially wrt. to modern processes. I personally wouldn't publish anything about this matter without getting it checked by someone else, because I know where the limits of my knowledge are.

The goal of my comment was to bring that to your attention - that you need someone to actually review your content before you continue teaching people the wrong thing. When you're educating people, you're in a position of power that comes with the responsibility of making sure what you write is as correct and clear as possible. You have a duty of care.

With all due respect, I would recommend you run any educational resources and infographics you create past an actual subject matter expert (not an LLM!) before release. Otherwise you're just spreading shiny misinformation.

All subtly wrong. And no, not in the 'simplified' sense.

https://blog.dragonsector.pl/2017/10/?m=1

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49194758

Points: 2

# Comments: 0

... but that S3 _is_ the control plane and consensus layer, no? You're just pushing this down the stack to whoever runs that S3 clone.

The fact that it's slop. People know it when they read it.

Put Claude and other LLMs away (for coding, writing, everything - block them on your firewall fully) for a few days and then write a blog post from scratch using your own words. No asking for help, comments, editing, nothing. Then compare against this. It'll jump out at you.

From the footer.

lol. lmao, even.

But most who keep on going about their 10x productivity gain are indistinguishable from that one obnoxious guy at a party who won't shut up about his Ayahuasca retreat last spring. And they think they're Erdős.

(also, this isn't a "Show HN")

Will this integrate with existing code that uses Pin? If not this will split the ecosystem even further...

Stop the presses, it's not an ad, it's just a “festive animation”!

Good, that's the least bad behavior. (Postel's law be damned)

Does anyone know how this behaves when encountering a repeated key in an object? (RFC8259 states that keys SHOULD be unique, which makes that generally allowed and implementations all behave slightly differently).