It’s entirely another to force them or restrict them from engaging in transactions between consenting parties that do not infringe on a third party.

You are comparing products that aren’t equivalent. If I “buy” a book on Kindle, that book might have restrictions (natural or artificial) that don’t apply to a physical book.

The product is what it is. If you don’t like it don’t buy it. If you bought a physical Xbox disc 20 years ago, you wouldn’t expect to be able to use it on PlayStation.

Nobody is forced to play video games.

This is not true. Non determinism only arises via sampling, and to a much lesser extent, CUDA kernel launch subtleties.

They enshrined a number of rights that are under attack by both ends of the political spectrum.

It's the failure to break the cycle which leads to dictatorship, and is unequivocally not the solution to problems of today.

The lion doesn't concern itself with the opinion of sheep.

But how are people doing recency biasing with vector databases?

All of our approaches are either expensive or super hacky.

Of course. As I noted before, dripping in European condescension. Nothing you can actually point to, just condescension from a region that has been left behind over the past century.

> Attacks on rule of law and civil liberties have increased, and the right to privacy is one of those liberties. It's of course not limited to Trump, he wasn't in office when Snowden showed the world the scale of American mass surveillance on domestic and foreign citizens.

Which right or in what way has the right to privacy been attacked? Fully agree with you on attacks on rule of law. And I find Trump incredibly dangerous. But I do not think privacy in the US today has suffered. Please educate me.

> I'm totally unsure what you are attempting to imply. That mass surveillance by the American state stopped at some point in the last 10 years?

I am not implying anything. The Freedom Act curtailed a bunch of activities. You are implying nothing has changed. All of the Snowden revelations implicated many European countries: intelligence agencies spying on each others populations. I am asking you if you believe nothing has changed in the US do you 1) have any evidence of this and/or 2) believe that anything has changed in Europe? You've answered neither.

> What does that even mean "read history" ahaha. Espionage != mass surveillance. You do understand the difference, do you not?

Do you understand that the mass surveillance of European people was done at the behest of the intelligence agencies of those countries? And ditto for the NSA. The agreement was "you spy on mine and I'll spy on yours and we'll swap the intel". I am not talking about espionage. Foreign intelligence agencies spying on foreigners...what did you think they did?

> l m a o. Oh say can you see...

God, it's so painful. Yes in the same way that you talk about the US as a monolith and not 50 individual states. You don't care what Rhode Island does any more than I care what Latvia does.

Christ you guys are insufferable. It's no wonder everyone is leaving in droves.

And you have no protections from the "much more" bits, unlike in the US.

It's incredible that Europeans today think the culture of privacy is different. American privacy protections (from the government) were born out of European flaws.

The difference is that Europeans love the nanny state regulating private enterprise (GDPR) but never pointing that same effort against itself.

It's not a strange statement in the slightest if you live here or spend any appreciable time here. I take it you do not.

Yes, of course. That is why GP said "anymore".

Thanks for playing!

> Some politicians in Europe push for that, until now it has been refused by the others. Unlike in the US, there are many different parties in European countries. And Europe is made of politicians from many parties from many countries.

And yet neither party in the US is pushing for it...

> So the NSA doesn't do any kind of domestic surveillance anymore, is that what you believe?

Do you have any evidence to the contrary? Or if you believe this without evidence, do you have any evidence this is not occurring in Europe?

> So if it's surveilling allies, it's all good in your opinion?

Lol, lmao even. Yes, of course it is. Allies spy on each other. The Europeans do it to each other massively and have done since the dawn of Europe. Good lord, go read some history.

> "Far far"? Do you even realise that Europe is not one single country? The US elected Trump, twice.

Again, I live in Europe. I am well aware, but thanks for the classic European condescension. I don't like Trump. But how has he weakened privacy rights? And yes, beacause I don't want to write dozens of caveats for each teeny tiny member state, I consider Europe to be dominated by happenings in DE + FR + UK. I don't care what Latvia does.

MTP when done correctly is lossless. As you note: it is a draft. That draft is still checked by the original model. Drafted tokens are not accepted if the original model would not have selected them.

If you are having issues, something else is wrong. But in any case, you lack the domain knowledge to be posting authoritatively about it, and I suggest you read deeper into how these things work first.

The same is not true of Europeans and they generally believe their rights are much stronger than they are. Most Brits are not aware of the true nature of the Investigatory Powers Act. Most Frenchmen are not aware of Article L851-3.

Please, like what? GDPR?

This is not true. Whether you believe that FISA courts have teeth, or whether 3 letter agencies abide by the law, in most of Europe you do not even have the pretense of this. UK/FR and to a lesser extent DE are all much worse.

The worst parts of Patriot Act were undone in 2015, and the "F" in FISA stands for "Foreign". Europe continues to push policies like Chat Control and attempt to backdoor/ban E2E encryption for domestic surveillance.

The present day and trajectory in Europe is far far more grim than in the US.