<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: quantoracle</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=quantoracle</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2026 13:27:37 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=quantoracle" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by quantoracle in "The cult of vibe coding is dogfooding run amok"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’m a physician, not a developer. I built a quantitative finance API with 120 accuracy benchmarks verified against published analytical solutions from Hull and Wilmott. The reason it works is that financial math has objective ground truth — a Black-Scholes price either matches the textbook value or it doesn’t. There’s no vibes involved in the verification step, even if there were vibes involved in writing the code. The danger isn’t vibe coding. It’s vibe coding in domains where you can’t objectively test the output.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 18:39:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47707791</link><dc:creator>quantoracle</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47707791</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47707791</guid></item></channel></rss>