Incognito mode is fine. It doesn't persist data, it doesn't give websites access to existing main-profile data (cookies, etc), and it actually honors the settings of the profile it was spawned from.

None of this robustly prevents fingerprinting, but neither does switching to another browser or wiping your profile clean. There's just a bunch of system and network characteristics that leak info because of how the web is designed. Google didn't make it so and I don't think they're using it to serve you ads.

I think two things can simultaneously be true. Google's privacy practices aren't great, and they weren't actually doing anything that a reasonable person wouldn't expect to be happening in incognito. This was a lawsuit filed to shake them down, not to benefit the consumer. And apparently, it was flimsy enough that it started with a $5B demand, and is ending with no payout at all.

https://home.engineering.iastate.edu/~julied/classes/ee524/L...

That said, if you're not using it, it defeats the purpose. And the more you're using it, the higher the likelihood you will be detected down the line. Compare to Solarwinds.

For a bridge, you specify that it needs to withstand specific static and dynamic loads, plus several other things like that. Once you have the a handful of formulas sorted out, you can design thousands of bridges the same way; most of the implementation details, such as which color they paint it, don't matter much. I'm not talking out of my butt: I had a car bridge built and still have all the engineering plans. There's a lot of knowledge that goes into making them, but the resulting specification is surprisingly small.

Now try to formally specify a browser. The complexity of the specification will probably rival the complexity of implementation itself. You can break it into small state machines and work with that, but if you prove the correctness of 10,000 state machines, what did you actually prove about the big picture?

If you want to eliminate security issues, what does it even mean that a browser is secure? It runs code from the internet. It reads and writes files. I talks directly to hardware. We have some intuitive sense of what it's supposed and not supposed to do, but now write this down as math...

These "data removal" services spend a lot of effort going after the frontends, which is pretty self-serving: they can show the customer that there's something new to remove every single month or quarter, so you have to keep paying forever.

I suspect that the objective of these bulk spamming operations isn't to promote stuff on the platform, but to mess with other apps. LLMs trained on Reddit content, search engines that rank Reddit posts highly, etc.

But here's the thing: prevailing HN sentiments notwithstanding, your average Redditor leans left and is fairly anti-big-tech, so Reddit could have leveraged this angle. They could've said it's a pro-user move to stop OpenAI and the likes from unfairly profiting off your work. And most users would have applauded.

But Reddit didn't say that. They took a PR hit and decided to wait it out. The cynical explanation was that they were actually just trying to get some of that LLM money for themselves. And not long ago, they announced a big deal with Google to give access to user data for training purposes: https://www.reuters.com/technology/reddit-ai-content-licensi...

Frankly, I was on the fence about the API access thing until the motivation became clear.

And then either use that to win the trial, or force Apple into settling.

It's a valuable experience with a lot of potential upside in the long haul - but let's not pretend that it's less taxing than a cozy 9-to-5 tech job where your boss might ask you to update your OKRs once in a while.

And yes, it is technically a mammal neurotoxin too, although our bodies are better at compartmentalizing and managing the risk. Similarly, you don't drop dead if exposed to caffeine or nicotine, even though they are insect neurotoxins produced by plants to kill bugs.

But it cracks me up that we are flipping out about herbicides such as glyphosate or 2,5-D - both of which are plant growth regulators that have no real mechanism to cause obvious harm in animals - but we're a lot more flippant with actual animal neurotoxins such as permethrin.

Finally, here's a fun experiment: decide that terms of service don't matter and start building a product by scrapping Facebook or Google. See how they'd react. Actually, no need for guesswork - they clutched their pearls and threatened legal action more than once before. It's a bit of a "have your cake and eat it too" kind of a deal. Their data is precious intellectual property; your stuff is, well, up for grabs.

No, and a class action lawsuit against that practice doesn't make anyone better beyond "meaningless psychological satisfaction". But it's still something we do as a society, for good reasons, right?

Here, you have a number of commercial entities that are poised to make a ton of money off individually small but entirely non-consensual contributions of other people. You also have a "data laundering" industry where the datasets of webpages, books, and images are published by notionally non-profit entities that are in one way or another bankrolled by the commercial players, keeping their hands clean.

Framing the debate as being about "human progress" is sort of goofy in that world. We're not talking about academics tinkering with wacky ideas. We're talking about an industry that takes your work without asking and monetizes it. Yes, the sum of it is greater than the component pieces, but that doesn't mean you get to do whatever you want.

I was wearing a mask early on in the SF Bay Area. Back when the health authorities were saying that there's nothing to worry about and that masks don't help anyway. I remember so many people giving me the stink eye for no reason. I guess my behavior was the "anti-science", tinfoil-hat stance back then.

Then it all flipped on its head pretty much overnight. And when later, having been vaccinated and having had COVID, I stopped wearing a mask out in the open, I remember the same people getting angry at that. But if you traveled 50 miles outside the SF Bay Area, the reactions were exactly the opposite.

It just bugs me so much that we find ways to turn every single thing into a culture war. We go out of our way to find reasons to lash out against others. I'm not sure if social media is the source of it, but it sure provides a positive feedback loop.