<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: queuebert</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=queuebert</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 19:35:37 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=queuebert" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by queuebert in "Tesla killing Solar Roof is leaving installers with six-figure losses"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Is it? Modern roofing is pretty complex and is begging for innovation, even with materials that don't generate electricity.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 20:21:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49602578</link><dc:creator>queuebert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49602578</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49602578</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by queuebert in "Caltech Mathathon – first hackathon ever devoted to research level mathematics"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Serious question: Are you sure solving abstract mathematical problems with AI is responsible use? You will likely put mathematicians out of jobs, and I doubt solving the Collatz conjecture is urgent or will save lives.  It also robs a future Fields medalist of the pride of doing all by themselves.<p>All things AI seems to assume that more and faster is better, but there is no justification of that assumption.  As a biological counterexample, a tree grown quickly will likely not be as healthy or strong as one grown slowly.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 20:17:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49602539</link><dc:creator>queuebert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49602539</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49602539</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by queuebert in "Mother convicted of: her 5 yo walks short way to pond alone in Virginia"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's not backward, it's too forward. No one got arrested 100 yrs ago for letting their kid walk around alone.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 04:47:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49593995</link><dc:creator>queuebert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49593995</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49593995</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by queuebert in "Research acceleration: The view inside OpenAI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>/loop ?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 04:45:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49593984</link><dc:creator>queuebert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49593984</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49593984</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by queuebert in "Research acceleration: The view inside OpenAI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, because no employee with million-dollar comp has ever been untrustworthy in the history of business.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2026 04:44:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49593981</link><dc:creator>queuebert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49593981</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49593981</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by queuebert in "Dwarf Fortress is getting the mother of all magic updates"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's impressive. I thought the NetHack wiki would be older, but it dates to 2005, although I suspect there was an earlier version somewhere else.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2026 18:34:52 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49526058</link><dc:creator>queuebert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49526058</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49526058</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by queuebert in "All 253 Patterns from Christopher Alexander's a Pattern Language Summarized"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I highly recommend getting the full book. This should be required reading for every housing developer.  If you ever felt like a house or community was uncomfortable or made you subconsciously unhappy, you might find the reason in this book.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 04:27:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49016928</link><dc:creator>queuebert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49016928</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49016928</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by queuebert in "Goes-19 weather satellite enters Safe Hold mode"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'm sure that was 100% secure, too. /s (I did the same thing back then.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 18:18:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48938170</link><dc:creator>queuebert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48938170</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48938170</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by queuebert in "Goes-19 weather satellite enters Safe Hold mode"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The link OP submitted appears to be a webpage displaying a screenshot of another web page, and the image aspect ratio has been altered. It's so comically bad it had to be on purpose, or someone is doing their web dev in MS Word.<p>Edit: I think actually it's a screenshot of a screenshot even, and this appears to be the entire design of spaceweather.gov. What in the holy heck is going on there? This has to be a top 10 worst website designs of all time.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 18:13:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48938112</link><dc:creator>queuebert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48938112</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48938112</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by queuebert in "Midjourney Medical"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Statistically overdetection leads to poorer outcomes because interventions have a risk as well. That's why everyone doesn't get a yearly full body CT scan, for example. The current guidelines are based on optimizing for maximum good, and believe it or not some things are best not known about because the risk of dying from it is about the same as the risk of the treatment.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 15:39:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48587079</link><dc:creator>queuebert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48587079</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48587079</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by queuebert in "SpaceX, Other Mega IPOs Denied Fast Index Entry by S&P"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Markets are forward looking, pricing in future cash flows. No one should be thinking about SpaceX's present value when buying their stock. If you do that you'll always be too late to the party.<p>That said, I don't agree on the valuation, but I can see where some people could be coming from.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 18:38:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48507795</link><dc:creator>queuebert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48507795</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48507795</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by queuebert in "Claude Fable 5: mid-tier results on coding tasks"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's a joke about how fast it compiles. <i>whoosh</i></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 18:27:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48507667</link><dc:creator>queuebert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48507667</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48507667</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by queuebert in "Claude Fable 5: mid-tier results on coding tasks"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Why is that?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 15:51:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48505681</link><dc:creator>queuebert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48505681</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48505681</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by queuebert in "Claude Fable 5: mid-tier results on coding tasks"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> ... applying the same steps and rules n times<p>I do this too, with a document written for this purpose.<p>> ... a significant chunk of those runs involved the agent waiting for the compiler, linters, type checks, and test suites, as well as updating journals.<p>That is a good point. I'm mostly using C, which seemingly compiles in O(1) time, so I could imagine a large C++ or Rust codebase taking much longer to iterate simply due to compilation times.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2026 14:28:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48504638</link><dc:creator>queuebert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48504638</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48504638</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by queuebert in "Claude Fable 5: mid-tier results on coding tasks"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I don't understand how some of y'all use these things. I get garbage unless I give them very specific concrete tasks with as much context as possible. Anything that takes more than 30 min is usually a waste because the scope was too large.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2026 22:03:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48497024</link><dc:creator>queuebert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48497024</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48497024</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by queuebert in "Google to pay SpaceX $920M a month for compute capacity at xAI data centers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Worth noting the cost of dealing with Treasury's absolute dumpster fire of a website, though.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2026 03:41:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48431547</link><dc:creator>queuebert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48431547</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48431547</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by queuebert in "SpaceX, Other Mega IPOs Denied Fast Index Entry by S&P"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I didn't say that at all. I said it was <i>achievable</i> for SpaceX eventually. It's not a $1T company yet. Reading comprehension, people.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 18:06:14 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48416097</link><dc:creator>queuebert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48416097</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48416097</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by queuebert in "SpaceX, Other Mega IPOs Denied Fast Index Entry by S&P"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Historically a $1T market cap with a PE of 20.0 would be achievable with a $50B/yr profit.  That seems easily achievable eventually for SpaceX, as it has actual hardware and services and IP.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 02:31:12 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48407251</link><dc:creator>queuebert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48407251</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48407251</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by queuebert in "Uber cuts 23% of people division as new president takes over"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"What would you say you do here?"<p>"A lot of things."<p>You still gave zero concrete information about why HR is necessary. Which is exactly the problem here.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 20:24:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48389478</link><dc:creator>queuebert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48389478</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48389478</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by queuebert in "Uber cuts 23% of people division as new president takes over"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>As we enter this era of far more qualified candidates than jobs, HR will die eventually the equivalent of index funds is for hiring. Just as most money managers didn't beat the market and lost out to Bogle's low-cost index funds, people will figure out that HR doesn't do any better than any other random criteria for hiring and firing employees, since most of the applicants for most jobs will be able to do the job sufficiently well. Probably the answer is some sort of AI, but I bet you could do just as well rolling dice.<p>If most of us are honestly with ourselves, we'd realize the marginal return on difficult hiring decisions is extremely small.<p>As for the CYA aspect of HR, an AI can definitely do that cheaper and more callously.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 17:37:39 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48387070</link><dc:creator>queuebert</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48387070</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48387070</guid></item></channel></rss>