<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: quirkot</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=quirkot</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:55:38 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=quirkot" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by quirkot in "Antares achieves criticality of Mark-0 reactor"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Footnote has the backup. 2-3x is guesstimate, but it doesn't really matter. The answer is there's just not much waste to store</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 19:18:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48737891</link><dc:creator>quirkot</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48737891</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48737891</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by quirkot in "Antares Achieves Criticality of Mark-0 Reactor"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Europe has about 60,000 tons of nuclear waste storage[1], so lets say the global nuclear waste quantity is 2-3x or 120,000 to 180,000 tons. That sounds like a lot, however it's less than 2 weeks of coal deliveries to a coal plant (at 1 train of 115 cars each with 116 tons of coal = 13,340 tons delivered per day[2]). To take another approach, the average landfill size is 600 acres[3].<p>The "eh, just bury it" approach is really not a bad one. Its not even that much stuff to bury<p>[1] <a href="https://worldnuclearwastereport.org/" rel="nofollow">https://worldnuclearwastereport.org/</a><p>[2] <a href="https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=16651" rel="nofollow">https://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=16651</a><p>[3] <a href="https://www.colorado.edu/ecenter/2021/04/15/hidden-damage-landfills" rel="nofollow">https://www.colorado.edu/ecenter/2021/04/15/hidden-damage-la...</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 13:21:45 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48732416</link><dc:creator>quirkot</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48732416</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48732416</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by quirkot in "Daisugi, the Japanese technique of growing trees out of other trees (2020)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>In english this is called pollarding a tree. Historically it has been used for smaller wood pieces (firewood, etc). It's fuctionally different [from daisugi] because you don't get construction grade timber from it<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pollarding" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pollarding</a><p>[edit: clarification]</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 13:40:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719171</link><dc:creator>quirkot</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719171</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48719171</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by quirkot in "Do we need billionaires?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If you want good checks against a government, one dude rich enough to field an army has historically been a bad way to keep the government in existence</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 15:17:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48413687</link><dc:creator>quirkot</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48413687</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48413687</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by quirkot in "Do we need billionaires?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Made $1 billion? Throw 'em a parade, put their name on a plaque on Wall Street, and never let them touch a new penny from here on out.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 15:13:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48413633</link><dc:creator>quirkot</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48413633</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48413633</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by quirkot in "Superintelligence: The Idea That Eats Smart People (2016)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Gotta keep in mind that "you control what you can destroy" was expressed as the crux of a single-planet guerrilla group's maximalist negotiation strategy with an interstellar government, where the destruction was of the ability to travel between the stars. It's not a coherent theory of control outside of the razor thin application of "I'm willing to accept pain as long it hurts you much more." It is not a control that builds stability and infrastructure, it is the control of base extortion</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 02 Jun 2026 11:46:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48368974</link><dc:creator>quirkot</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48368974</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48368974</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by quirkot in "We let AIs run radio stations"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> do children have personalities if we left them in a dark room with no interactions with other humans?<p>Short answer: yes. generally speaking, personality traits range between 30% to 60% heritable</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 21:03:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48185592</link><dc:creator>quirkot</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48185592</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48185592</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by quirkot in "Music has scales / raagas. What about storytelling in movies and prestige shows?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Maybe there's some technical definitions for the words used to describe the films, but match between archetype and movie is incomprehensible to me. I'm not seeing a single one where the film is where I'd expect based on the descriptions</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2026 13:52:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48108323</link><dc:creator>quirkot</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48108323</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48108323</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by quirkot in "ASML became the chokepoint for cutting-edge chips"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> But it boils down to having the vision, the belief and the strength to follow through over many years<p>And importantly, that vision being correct. The graveyard of history is full of the dedicated yet incorrect.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2026 17:53:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47937978</link><dc:creator>quirkot</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47937978</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47937978</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by quirkot in "Microsoft and OpenAI end their exclusive and revenue-sharing deal"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>By that example, PostgreSQL itself is a form of intelligence relative to a physical filing system. It doesn't seem like your working definition of intelligence has a large overlap with a layman's conception of the word.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2026 21:17:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47927438</link><dc:creator>quirkot</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47927438</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47927438</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by quirkot in "How to be anti-social – a guide to incoherent and isolating social experiences"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"being yourself" means choosing to believe that the you that is true is competent and capable of growth while the awkwardness is a temporary barrier between that is not reflective of your true nature.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 24 Apr 2026 12:36:25 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47889364</link><dc:creator>quirkot</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47889364</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47889364</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by quirkot in "AI-assisted cognition endangers human development?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>regarding #2: how many serfs came home after re-digging the toilet hole to eat a meal of hand-milled grain bread and old vegetables with the members of the family that survived infancy and thought "life just doesn't get any better than this"?  Probably almost all of them</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Apr 2026 19:23:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47783963</link><dc:creator>quirkot</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47783963</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47783963</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by quirkot in "Cambodia unveils statue to honour famous landmine-sniffing rat"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Magawa cleared 1,517,711 sq.ft of land. He could work at a pace of 2,808 sq.ft (a doubles tennis court) every 20 minutes. If he maintained that pace, he worked 180.2 hours. Let's assume, with hazardous terrain, he worked 25% that speed on average. If that's the case he worked ~720 hours during a 5-6 year career. A different rat, Ronin, that found more stuff found a total of 124 explosive devices. So Magawa found no more than 1 explosive for every 5 hours and 45 minutes of searching. Or approximately one device every 17.25 tennis courts of searching.<p>Real needle in a haystack stuff, wow</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 07 Apr 2026 19:14:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47680007</link><dc:creator>quirkot</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47680007</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47680007</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by quirkot in "“Collaboration” is bullshit"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Money is the sledgehammer of incentives. Above a reasonable amount of pay, it's overkill and makes lots of collateral problems. The really effective incentives are status based and situational to the group dynamic</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 23 Mar 2026 18:06:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47493032</link><dc:creator>quirkot</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47493032</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47493032</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by quirkot in "Ask HN: How do you deal with people who trust LLMs?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>i just actually read that and it is possibly the most morally abominable screed I've come across in a long time. Shocking that its acceptable to share in polite company</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 20:23:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47445419</link><dc:creator>quirkot</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47445419</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47445419</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by quirkot in "Ask HN: How do you deal with people who trust LLMs?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>observation a: Document title is about a minority's rightful supremacy<p>observation b: document says "this is not political" then dives into persuasive speech<p>conclusion: this document was written by the bad guys</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 16:12:47 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47441783</link><dc:creator>quirkot</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47441783</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47441783</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by quirkot in "Ask HN: How do you deal with people who trust LLMs?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You're limiting the frame to an employment situation. Higher quality sources of knowledge are free: Wikipedia, public libraries, etc. Similar quality sources of information are also free: human relationships.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 12:35:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47438290</link><dc:creator>quirkot</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47438290</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47438290</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by quirkot in "Ask HN: How do you deal with people who trust LLMs?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>counterpoint: if I have to treat the computer like a person, what's the point of talking to a computer in the first place? Particularly when there are so many other systems that can provide answers without the runaround</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2026 02:44:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47434239</link><dc:creator>quirkot</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47434239</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47434239</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by quirkot in "The political effects of X's feed algorithm"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Train the algorithm so that you can be the sort of product you want to see in the world</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 21:46:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47066904</link><dc:creator>quirkot</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47066904</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47066904</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by quirkot in "The political effects of X's feed algorithm"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>the issue brought up in the article isn't that "the algorithm is biased" but that "the algorithm causes bias". A feed could perfectly alternate between position A and position B and show no bias at all, but still select more incendiary content on topic A and drive bias towards or away from it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2026 21:45:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47066891</link><dc:creator>quirkot</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47066891</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47066891</guid></item></channel></rss>