<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: r9l</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=r9l</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 18:47:30 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=r9l" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by r9l in "Researchers find evidence of ChatGPT buzzwords turning up in everyday speech"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Mmm interesting point. The age of introducing error to prove humanity is upon us.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 07:24:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45049421</link><dc:creator>r9l</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45049421</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45049421</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by r9l in "The Deletion of Docker.io/Bitnami"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I understand the vision behind trying to monetize these images for enterprise use, and can get down with the idea of maintaining both a “less secure but free” and “more secure but paid” model. But it appears that Broadcom’s intent is to over time force everything on to their enterprise offerings, which seems like a short sighted thing to do.<p>Over time it will limit adoption and ultimately just make everyone go back to the native open source offering, cutting bitnami/Broadcom out of the loop.<p>Broadcom really took the open source community backwards with this move IMO.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2025 07:15:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45049362</link><dc:creator>r9l</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45049362</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=45049362</guid></item></channel></rss>