<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: radicalbyte</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=radicalbyte</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 19 Aug 2026 03:11:16 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=radicalbyte" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by radicalbyte in "Nvidia's Risky Business"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The whole push behind .Net Core was to get .Net running on Linux well and natively and was being lead largely by those of us using .Net for web. We were being murdered by other languages at the time; mono was an option but Microsoft shops usually needed to target something blessed/backed by MS.<p>Largely the same market (Enterprise) but not the different segment (web as opposed to Windows/WinForms).<p>I ported about 15 years of projects from various versions of .Net to .Net Core whilst they were developing (and sent feedback to the team - they were asking us to do that) and the process was pretty reasonable. You were only really stuck if you were using something very very Windows specific (certain image processing libraries iirc) and even then it was largely manageable.<p>The old full-fat framework is, AFAIK, still supported, as there's a whole lot of legacy code which is Windows specific which is still expensive / hard to port over.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2026 06:44:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49268651</link><dc:creator>radicalbyte</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49268651</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49268651</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by radicalbyte in "Who's afraid of Chinese models?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Our intelligence services have capabilities, it's not just the US. The Patriot / Cloud Act increase the scope outside of intelligence agencies. I'm of the opinion that for military intelligence there is a legitimate need to have some - black - capability. It should just be highly limited in scope.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2026 13:33:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48992142</link><dc:creator>radicalbyte</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48992142</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48992142</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by radicalbyte in "EU Commission: addictive design Instagram and Facebook in breach of the DSA"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is the EU Commission. Yesterday was the Christian nutjobs and right-wing ghouls in the European Parliament who undemocratically pushed through their crackhead Chat Control.<p>EU Commission = US Senate, EU Parliament = US Congress. Kinda.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 13:22:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48859579</link><dc:creator>radicalbyte</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48859579</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48859579</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by radicalbyte in "EV Batteries Are Defying Expectations After Miles"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Some of the early models - either the Chevvy or Nissan Leaf - had battery packs which would degrade very quickly. This was causes by the charging system which seemed designed to destroy them.<p>The expectation in the EV fan world was that modern (> 2019) battery packs were very likely to retain 80% of their charge for well over the time anyone expected with the drop to 80% itself taking most of the car's expected lifetime. This was because the standard extrapolations ignored improvements in charging algorithms and that real-world usages were expected to be better for the battery than the models.<p>Another prediction we made is that range under cold (or very hot) weather would be significantly reduced and that seems to be the case too.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 09:14:18 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48792564</link><dc:creator>radicalbyte</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48792564</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48792564</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by radicalbyte in "Zuckerberg 'Admits' Meta's Layoffs Were Ineffective"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They benefited greatly from the FTC not doing their job. Google too. Overall it has been extremely damaging to the industry but I suspect that it is the main reason for a small part of California (it not even American exceptionalism, it's Silicon Valley exceptionalism) completely dominating tech.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 13:52:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48775073</link><dc:creator>radicalbyte</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48775073</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48775073</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by radicalbyte in "Please stop the AI confidence theater"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Venture Capitalists are now even worse than the marketers.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 13:46:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48774980</link><dc:creator>radicalbyte</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48774980</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48774980</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by radicalbyte in "Claude Code is steganographically marking requests"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Claude Code are slopmaxxxing and you're considering their "judgement"? :-)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 16:54:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48735555</link><dc:creator>radicalbyte</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48735555</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48735555</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by radicalbyte in "The CEO of Mullvad is the main financer of the Swedish Örebro party"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>No they weren't, 50 years ago is when they were working very hard to get people in from Turkey/North Africa to do those jobs because they wanted to pay peanuts and the natives had options.<p>These are all hyper exploitative industries based on capital exploiting the poor. Which is something we both agree on.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 12:07:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48731523</link><dc:creator>radicalbyte</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48731523</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48731523</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by radicalbyte in "The CEO of Mullvad is the main financer of the Swedish Örebro party"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Migration in my part of Europe (Holland) has largely been workers for jobs the Dutch won't do. These people are abused as a sort of semi-serf labour mainly in the farming sector.<p>Some groups are a big net benefit to our (looking at the income the group benefits / social support costs) and others slight net negative. But once you take the economy into account it's positive.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2026 20:56:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48725118</link><dc:creator>radicalbyte</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48725118</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48725118</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by radicalbyte in "Anthropic says Alibaba illicitly extracted Claude AI model capabilities"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>They still are. My kids haven't watched a single Simpsons or Family Guy episode but are quoting both regularly.<p>Facebook et al also quite literally stole email contact lists and installed spyware at kernel level on mobile phones which they used to spy on all Android users. Via the phone manufacturers.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2026 10:54:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48671648</link><dc:creator>radicalbyte</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48671648</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48671648</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by radicalbyte in "The Commodore Callback 8020 smart flip phone"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The Samsung with parental control does the same thing as this phone only you don't have to beg Commodore to install the apps your kid's school requires them to install.<p>It's at most a $200 smart phone (doubling the prices for the DAC + IEMs) being sold at > $500 with a funky design, interesting OS and their own app store.<p>I hope that they sell millions of these things, enough so that they can afford to buy the Amiga IP... just don't see it happening.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 21:12:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48622643</link><dc:creator>radicalbyte</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48622643</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48622643</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by radicalbyte in "The Commodore Callback 8020 smart flip phone"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It has the same core spec as a $120 (delivered) Samsung phone and will cost between $500-$600 (delivered).<p>The C64U is an amazing achievement but it seems too early to go for the smart phone.<p>Hopefully there is a niche and their business plan is viable for a small number of sales.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2026 15:06:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48619569</link><dc:creator>radicalbyte</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48619569</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48619569</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by radicalbyte in "Ubiquiti: Enterprise NAS, Built on ZFS"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Keeping Linux-based devices up and running and somewhat reliable is horrible. I'm 45, I've spent 25 years doing that. Time I'll never get back. Time I'm spending with my kids instead of dicking around with an obscure bug caused by some random dude who is spending his free time doing thankless work maintaining some C code he wrote 40 years ago.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2026 18:13:23 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48601412</link><dc:creator>radicalbyte</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48601412</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48601412</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by radicalbyte in "Ubiquiti: Enterprise NAS, Built on ZFS"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>An assumption, I made. Failed, it was.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 21:21:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48591806</link><dc:creator>radicalbyte</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48591806</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48591806</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by radicalbyte in "Ubiquiti: Enterprise NAS, Built on ZFS"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I've been so impressed with Ubiquiti that I've decided to target FreeBSD for my current side project. Their camera system is wonderful. Their DreamMachine is a massive upgrade for my home network. Their APs are rock solid, no hassle, just work, and it integrates so well. I have my work / home on different subnets. I have the kids on a different subnet and behind a firewall providing some protection against ads.<p>Very happy customer here.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 20:31:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48591131</link><dc:creator>radicalbyte</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48591131</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48591131</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by radicalbyte in "Hospitals and universities repurposing drugs at lower cost"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I tried to explain to people in The Netherlands this exact problem when they were thinking about switching from single-player to a commercial insurance company model.<p>Insurance companies always have an incentive to make healthcare services expensive. They have even more incentive to make healthcare expensive and do deals on the backside where their suppliers give them a kickback. Even better if said kickback comes via a side door.<p>So we went for the commercial insurance companies. It took them 4 years before they change the drug choice from decentralised (Pharmacies deal with drugs companies, received small discounts which funded a good quality of care) to centralised (Insurance deal with drug companies, receives kickbacks) and the Pharmacies funding was drastically cut leading to worse quality of care and more drugs being used. Double-whammy because in the previous system the Pharmacy did medication reviews which almost always result in a reduction in drugs (the thing with drugs is that quite a lot of them are given to reduce side effects of other drugs, the original drug gets cancelled but the side effect reducer gets forgotten and just continues ad infinitum).<p>Health insurance has been super inflationary since then when controlled for quality of care.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 18 Jun 2026 20:26:58 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48591058</link><dc:creator>radicalbyte</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48591058</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48591058</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by radicalbyte in "Ask HN: Why is the HN crowd so anti-AI?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Sounds like me. It's awesome. Only the sheer amount of very clear fraud and the way an entire way of people who, not too long ago, where barely functional, have jumped on the bandwagon (same as with crypto) just sours me on it.<p>That and Jenson screwing those of us who made him over the last decade.<p>It'll be better once the fraudsters are in jail and once we're able have boxes with ~1TB ram running off of our solar in the garage.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2026 06:43:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48422081</link><dc:creator>radicalbyte</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48422081</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48422081</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by radicalbyte in "Anthropic confidentially submits draft S-1 to the SEC"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Thanks for replying, now I remember why I used to spend all day on this site :-) A lot of the political changes and my exposure to some of the VC people outside of public view have soured tech for me. That and the current cult-like behaviour and clear fraud from the crypto and now AI waves... anyhow, I digress.<p>We were big AV users initially, I think for 2 years? This was 94-97 so my memory of the time periods is fuzzy. When Google came along  I have very vivid memory of it providing not only better search results but also faster loads times.<p>I wonder if Google was already geo-distributed at the time? Latency was real then, it wasn't uncommon to hit 350ms (compared to 20-50ms to Europe) and the difference would have been felt back then. It was a killer for Counter Strike.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 04 Jun 2026 20:36:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48404289</link><dc:creator>radicalbyte</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48404289</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48404289</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by radicalbyte in "Anthropic confidentially submits draft S-1 to the SEC"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>No it wasn't. Google had a tiny front page back then, Alta-Vista was visibly slower. Very similar to Excite. All of the others were terrible.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 06:03:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48380504</link><dc:creator>radicalbyte</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48380504</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48380504</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by radicalbyte in "Anthropic confidentially submits draft S-1 to the SEC"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Erm 2008 isn't early, I had been using it for almost a decade by then. They had won by 2001. No-one who knew Microsoft thought that they had a chance with Bing. This was post-Gates and Microsoft were already a laughing stock in 2008 with respect to the web.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 03 Jun 2026 06:01:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48380479</link><dc:creator>radicalbyte</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48380479</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48380479</guid></item></channel></rss>