<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: rainbowDolphin</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=rainbowDolphin</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2026 03:21:36 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=rainbowDolphin" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rainbowDolphin in "Google Declaring War on the Web"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Agreed. I was a carpenter for a long time and have built everything from completely disposable structures to things that ended up in Design Within Reach.<p>I think Ikea is great. Sure, the cheaper stuff consists of veneered particle board at best. But they (at least used to) use thicker veneers, often include relatively high quality hardware, and make some products that are just completely solid (stainless kitchen gear, simple but serviceable pine furniture, standing desks, some bedding).<p>What gets to me are places like West Elm and similar companies. Mid-Century design, but it's the same veneered particle board as the much cheaper Ikea stuff, and costs far more.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2026 01:33:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48216710</link><dc:creator>rainbowDolphin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48216710</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48216710</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rainbowDolphin in "Poland is now among the 20 largest economies"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The risk is absolutely real, and varies immensely, as does its significance.<p>Consider the risks of VC backed initiatives, which far more often than not, return less than market salary to entrepreneurs, and less than the S&P 500 to capitalists.<p>For a shot at the jackpot, entrepreneurs are risking substandard salaries, and capitalists substandard returns.<p>You could argue that the capitalist’s risk is more significant than the entrepreneur’s. Even in failure, a VC initiative can afford the entrepreneur greater networking and professional experience than other roles, which increases their future earning potential and offsets their risk of substandard salary.<p>Hard to say the same for the capitalist, who is also, of course, risking a far greater amount of currency than anyone else.<p>But a risk’s significance is not determined by the amount wagered; it is determined by the consequences of losing the wager. As well as the consequences of participation, or lack thereof.<p>Median American lifetime earnings are somewhere between one and two million dollars; let’s say an entire life costs two million. A capitalist capable of investing a billion dollars could risk an entire lifetime’s money on a venture every other month, for eighty years, cradle to grave, and if they suffered complete losses every time, they’d still die with enough money for 1600 years of life in a wealthy nation.<p>The sum risked is immense. But the consequences of losing it are null.<p>It is, of course, more nuanced than that. Many businesses are funded by people with far less than a billion dollars, and many of them fail. There's also 3,000 billionaires, and an overwhelming majority of human lives that cost far less than American's.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2026 00:07:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48070316</link><dc:creator>rainbowDolphin</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48070316</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48070316</guid></item></channel></rss>