<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: randallsquared</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=randallsquared</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 22:15:44 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=randallsquared" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by randallsquared in "Netflix employee fired for sharing personal details in retreat trust exercise"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>So they couldn't come up with an excuse that would have been a legitimate reason?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2026 03:17:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49078861</link><dc:creator>randallsquared</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49078861</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49078861</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by randallsquared in "Htmx 4.0, the first JavaScript library to release exclusively on the Game Boy"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>To be clear, making clothing is not actually their business.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 11:45:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49068161</link><dc:creator>randallsquared</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49068161</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49068161</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by randallsquared in "Show HN: Port Zero – how I learned to stop worrying and love PORT=0"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The part that is being charged for isn't the coding, but the operating. How little should someone charge to be on pagerduty 24/7?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 10:31:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49067543</link><dc:creator>randallsquared</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49067543</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49067543</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by randallsquared in "US citizen charged after GrapheneOS phone wipes during airport search"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> <i>U.S. law though is highly non-autistic</i><p>When the judge and officers of the court agree with me, the law is reasonable and just, but when they do not agree with me, the law is arbitrary and capricious. ¯\_(ツ)_/¯<p>Having the law be whatever it's thought to be by police, prosectors, judges, and others can lead to obvious injustices, but there's been no serious attempt to remove ambiguity in any country's legal code as far as I know.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2026 02:53:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49064691</link><dc:creator>randallsquared</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49064691</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49064691</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by randallsquared in "What's Under Your Feet in New York City?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There's a lot one could say about<p>> <i>following the law of the highest of high courts to the letter.</i><p>but I don't think that "there is no 'high court' at all" is one, for believers.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 26 Jul 2026 18:11:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49060725</link><dc:creator>randallsquared</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49060725</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49060725</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by randallsquared in "Back to Kagi"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> <i>And of course, if you send them money, all the infuriating UX issues mysteriously disappear.</i><p>In the context of paying for Kagi instead of using Google for free, paying for YouTube instead of using, uh, YouTube for free seems like a solution, rather than the problem you seem to have implied it is.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 23 Jul 2026 11:04:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49019640</link><dc:creator>randallsquared</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49019640</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49019640</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by randallsquared in "Which streaming service was that on again?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Or the search in the middle of the screenshot that tops the article.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 21:24:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49013652</link><dc:creator>randallsquared</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49013652</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49013652</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by randallsquared in "OpenAI and Hugging Face address security incident during model evaluation"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>You're suggesting that @anematode was asking why they didn't test the sandbox escape first? Yeah, I don't know. I've read other statements by both OpenAI and Anthropic about that very kind of test, so maybe they had, or believed they had, and it hadn't escaped in those tests. The behavior of these systems isn't deterministic, which is part of the problem.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 18:39:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49011422</link><dc:creator>randallsquared</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49011422</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49011422</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by randallsquared in "OpenAI and Hugging Face address security incident during model evaluation"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That's the alarming thing about this result: they did run the model in the sandbox, in the sense that they believed there was no internet access for the model.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 11:02:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49004783</link><dc:creator>randallsquared</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49004783</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49004783</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by randallsquared in "OpenAI and Hugging Face address security incident during model evaluation"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Do you think there is such a thing as perfect security? No one can "get it right" in the face of arbitrarily high intelligence, which is why it would be preferable to get alignment correct before building something with higher intelligence than current sota. That, however, is not going to happen, because someone will take the risk even if "we" don't, and better "us" than them. Hence "If anyone builds it...".</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 22 Jul 2026 04:12:02 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49001786</link><dc:creator>randallsquared</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49001786</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49001786</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by randallsquared in "Orion Browser by Kagi"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Well, no, to be clear! There are a lot of decisions that are made already for you when you use something else as a foundation.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 2026 01:56:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48973587</link><dc:creator>randallsquared</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48973587</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48973587</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by randallsquared in "SpaceX bond worth 10% less than issue price – heading for junk bond status"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The word "public" doesn't mean that in this case. It's still a private company.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2026 15:41:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48922553</link><dc:creator>randallsquared</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48922553</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48922553</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by randallsquared in "A dock that wakes up reliably"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>MY CalDigit TS4 is not what I would have blamed for this issue, given that every time it happens for me, opening the lid of my Mac shows that it's asking, again, if this CalDigit accessory should be allowed to connect. This used to happen after every single reboot, but now it's rare, though I haven't changed anything about the setup in a year. I attributed this to MacOS problems, for that reason.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 11:29:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880275</link><dc:creator>randallsquared</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880275</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880275</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by randallsquared in "A dock that wakes up reliably"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>And they are not immune: a few years ago when I was using an Apple Studio Display, it had a similar issue where sometimes it would not wake from sleep, and the only workaround was to unplug it and wait NN seconds for cap discharge, and then plug it back in. (There's no power switch, so no other way to restart the CPU in it). After a number of updates, it no longer seems to do this, or at least the current user of it hasn't mentioned any such issue.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2026 11:23:17 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880235</link><dc:creator>randallsquared</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880235</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48880235</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by randallsquared in "New Sweden: the US's long-lost 'secret' colony"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It need not be democratic in the modern, universal suffrage sense.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 01:44:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48839902</link><dc:creator>randallsquared</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48839902</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48839902</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by randallsquared in "What does Jeff Bezos think is going to happen?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The poster isn't pussyfooting around the issue, he's feigning discovery to emphasize the point as a rhetorical move.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 20:33:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48810141</link><dc:creator>randallsquared</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48810141</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48810141</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by randallsquared in "Reflections on the Guillotine (1957)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> <i>I saw a question once on Quora asking why the poor don’t rip the wealthy out of their houses and the top reply was “Nazi!” with hundreds of upvotes.</i><p>This seems odd because it usually goes the other way: people complaining about the rich typically tar <i>them</i> as the "Nazis". For people against destroying the rich, the usual epithet for those who want to do so would be "commies"...</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 03:29:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48791016</link><dc:creator>randallsquared</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48791016</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48791016</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by randallsquared in "Supersonic flight returning to US after half-century ban"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The rule bans the supersonic flight regardless of whether it's audible or not, so they'd still be asking for the rule to be changed.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 19:45:53 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48779140</link><dc:creator>randallsquared</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48779140</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48779140</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by randallsquared in "Supersonic flight returning to US after half-century ban"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>When Boom was testing last year, the sonic boom never reached the ground, as I recall. That can be arranged at higher altitudes, but doesn't work at low ones.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 19:37:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48779057</link><dc:creator>randallsquared</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48779057</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48779057</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by randallsquared in "It Still Can't Do My Job: Four Years of Moving Goalposts (2022–2026)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I did notice that the "quotes" weren't linked as I would have expected with that "you can check" language, but after searching for the exact phrases, it does look like they're vague paraphrasing, not actual quotes.  Sigh.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2026 16:12:49 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48776715</link><dc:creator>randallsquared</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48776715</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48776715</guid></item></channel></rss>