<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: rayiner</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=rayiner</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 01:17:51 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=rayiner" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rayiner in "The case for overhauling American science"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>No, it was from a random substack: <a href="https://www.strangeloopcanon.com/p/some-things-to-learn-from-the-british" rel="nofollow">https://www.strangeloopcanon.com/p/some-things-to-learn-from...</a>.<p>I’m not sure what historians could debate here. The EIC ultimately failed as a business once it became a government—the costs of governing wiped out the profits from the trade monopoly. But the administrative achievements are undeniable.<p>This is evident from undisputed historical facts. In the mid-18th century, England’s per capita GDP was only about double that of the Mughal Empire’s. The Mughals themselves were an organized, sophisticated, Persianate Empire with a centralized. bureaucracy. The technological advantage was incremental: e.g. iron cannons versus bronze cannons, standardized ammunition, etc. But the Mughals had vastly more manpower and state revenues. In the Anglo Mughal War, the Mughals obliterated the EIC forces with a 500,000 man army. Less than 75 years later, the EIC took over the Mughal Empire with just a few thousand European soldiers. It never had more than 35,000 European soldiers in India. That’s a crazy achievement. It would be like Amazon putting together a private army and taking over the EU.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 21:46:29 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49314622</link><dc:creator>rayiner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49314622</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49314622</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rayiner in "The case for overhauling American science"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Disneyland. Walt Disney's conception of "The Happiest Place on Earth" was brought to life in 366 days. Source: Under Construction: A look inside Walt Disney’s Disneyland.<p>I love watching the “making of Disneyland” movies they have on Disney+. Really captures the American spirit of just <i>doing stuff.</i></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 21:29:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49314516</link><dc:creator>rayiner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49314516</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49314516</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rayiner in "Brazilian election filter in X For You timeline"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Ultimately the only antidote to US propaganda is nationalism.<p>Ironic, isn't it?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 16:42:56 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49312051</link><dc:creator>rayiner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49312051</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49312051</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rayiner in "Brazilian election filter in X For You timeline"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>These laws don't "protect democracy," even the most charitable interpretation of them is that they protect liberal values <i>against democracy.</i> They're inherently counter-majoritarian. Democracy doesn't mean liberalism. E.g. If Iran's ayatollah was elected by free and fair elections, but otherwise the country's laws and policies were the same, that would still be democracy.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 16:41:09 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49312030</link><dc:creator>rayiner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49312030</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49312030</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rayiner in "Working with AI Feels More Like Leadership Than Coding"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes, I agree, AI's risk creating a huge pipeline problem.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 16:36:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49311977</link><dc:creator>rayiner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49311977</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49311977</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rayiner in "Working with AI feels more like leadership than coding"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> And sometimes this intern which can produce code at blazing speeds get some subtleties wrong, so you can never trust their output and have to check every time.<p>You're just describing junior employees lol.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 15:34:00 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49311456</link><dc:creator>rayiner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49311456</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49311456</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rayiner in "Working with AI feels more like leadership than coding"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> The conclusion also completely contradicts a previous point, which is that managing an LLM is not like managing a human.<p>For small scale stuff, it seems very much like managing a human. I've been using Grok and Claude for some small GUI apps, and it's incredible how accurate Claude in particular is for handling vague instructions.[1] I can take a screenshot of some part of the UI and drop it into the chat and say ("The spacing here looks weird, give me a few recommendations on how to fix it."). You can also say stuff like "make this look more modern and conform to modern AppKit guidelines." You don't have to micromanage it, at least when you break things down into small features. (But that's true of humans too.)<p>[1] Claude is significantly better than Grok at doing Mac UI app development. Interestingly, Grok is significantly better than Claude at legal research and summarizing/analyzing non-code documents.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 15:29:48 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49311415</link><dc:creator>rayiner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49311415</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49311415</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rayiner in "Why does Opus 5 feel worse to work with?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Not at all. I think you have a mistaken view of who the average human is. They are terrible at turning their thoughts into written language. It's just nebulous clouds. Claude is like 75th percentile at communicating ideas.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 05:36:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49307942</link><dc:creator>rayiner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49307942</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49307942</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rayiner in "The case for overhauling American science"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Organizational effectiveness and efficiency is a moral virtue. It's a force multiplier that you can apply to whatever end you think is moral or ethical.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 03:34:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49307359</link><dc:creator>rayiner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49307359</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49307359</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rayiner in "The case for overhauling American science"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Effective at what though? The article is not exactly painting a rosy picture of EIC, nor should it.<p>The EIC overthrew a gunpowder empire with vast resources and one of the largest militaries in the world with 1,000 European soldiers and a few dozen administrators in London. There's incredible lessons in there, orthogonal to whatever you're talking about.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 03:30:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49307336</link><dc:creator>rayiner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49307336</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49307336</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rayiner in "The case for overhauling American science"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I'd argue we have over-corrected on that stuff. Go back and look how processes worked in the 1950s and 1960s. People used to write relatively short proposals to do quite massive works. It's the meme: "You can just do stuff!"<p>I'd argue that this is one of the advantages of Anglo and Anglo-American culture that has become eroded over time. I've been reading about the British East India Company and how much discretion employees were afforded in carrying out their work: <a href="https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/04/east-india-company-original-corporate-raiders" rel="nofollow">https://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/mar/04/east-india-com...</a>. They had like 35 employees in London and managed to take over Mughal India, which was a gunpowder empire with guns, cannons, 4-5x the state revenues and 25x the population of Britain. Pound for pound it's probably one of the most effective organizations in history.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 01:47:40 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49306823</link><dc:creator>rayiner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49306823</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49306823</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rayiner in "RISC-V: They Should Have Known Better"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> X86 is the best argument that you can build a fast efficient RISC-V chip... because the X86 instruction set is a much bigger mess.<p>I don't think that's actually true. There's weird historical baggage and whatnot. But if you're running in long mode, it's actually a fairly sensible architecture with useful memory addressing modes.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 01:25:10 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49306660</link><dc:creator>rayiner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49306660</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49306660</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rayiner in "RISC-V: They Should Have Known Better"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Isn't almost everything in MIPS long outside patent protection?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 01:22:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49306643</link><dc:creator>rayiner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49306643</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49306643</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rayiner in "The case for overhauling American science"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The difference is giving more power to researchers directly and side-stepping university administration and overhead. See: <a href="https://www.nsf.gov/policies/document/indirect-cost-rate" rel="nofollow">https://www.nsf.gov/policies/document/indirect-cost-rate</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 15 Aug 2026 00:43:57 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49306374</link><dc:creator>rayiner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49306374</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49306374</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rayiner in "How Organizations Use AI: Evidence from ChatGPT [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What statement did you find antisocial? That richer people are on average smarter?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 23:15:04 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49305741</link><dc:creator>rayiner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49305741</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49305741</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rayiner in "Why does Opus 5 feel worse to work with?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Constantly using inanimate nouns as the subjects in sentences in order to unlock variety in verb choice, especially when it helps construct a sentence where the real action can 'land' like a surprise at the end.<p>A lot of people write like that, lol. I call it the "theater" mode of writing--the plot twist comes at the end.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 13:28:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49298403</link><dc:creator>rayiner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49298403</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49298403</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rayiner in "How Organizations Use AI: Evidence from ChatGPT [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> Less wealthy parents are likely working more hours<p>The top income decile in the U.S. works 10% more hours than the bottom decile. Only a bit over half of low-income kids live in a household where a parent works full time.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 12:46:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49298003</link><dc:creator>rayiner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49298003</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49298003</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rayiner in "How Organizations Use AI: Evidence from ChatGPT [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Are you defining "poor" to mean everyone who doesn't send their kids to Philips Exeter?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 00:14:43 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49293328</link><dc:creator>rayiner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49293328</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49293328</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rayiner in "How Organizations Use AI: Evidence from ChatGPT [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>> But the shiny things keep the poorer parents and mediocre teachers happy while keeping down cost per lesson per child.<p>Baltimore spends more per student than Switzerland.<p>> As always the children of the rich and powerful get bespoke education... You could call it elegant education for a more civilized age...<p>Education for more affluent people is often cheaper per student. The benefit richer students have is that, on average, their parents are smarter, more conscientious, etc.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 22:57:36 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49292782</link><dc:creator>rayiner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49292782</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49292782</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rayiner in "[dead]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Iraq never had democracy before, while Venezuela was a pretty functioning democracy for half a century. And the civilizational distance between Venezuelans and democracy was quite a bit shorter than for people in Iraq. Even non-democratic countries in Latin America are still the beneficiaries of a millennia of European social development, specifically the erasure of extended family, clan, and tribal identities (which makes functional democracy impossible).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 05:57:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49282219</link><dc:creator>rayiner</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49282219</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49282219</guid></item></channel></rss>