proof: boldly claiming being open source in literally first sentence, while cowardly hiding on-by-default telemetry (WTF??) in truly last paragraph of readme.

sorry to sound harsh, but this is typical old era playbook here.

in the era of AI, fortunately, such products has much lower value. people and VCs didn’t yet tune to it.

unfortunately a small team can reproduce it in two months, which greatly lowers value of it.

we, as a collective, have to change our value-judging logic and tune it to post AI world.

Honestly I do not understand those last ten years craziness about 'new-native-gpu-turbo-ultra-xhigh-max-terminal' .

(my) battle tested urxvt under X11 is STILL faster then shitty (and all others):

## ascii (95 MiB cat, best wall of 3)

| terminal | wall | user | sys | throughput | |---|---|---|---|---| | urxvt | 0.78s | -s | -s | ~122 MiB/s |

I vouched for your comment, as I find it perfectly 'not agreeing' answer.

- tell lies to ones who want to hear lies -> riches

- tell truth to ones who want to hear truth -> modesty

- tell truth to ones who want to hear lies -> bankruptcy

p.s. read it on a blog name I dont remember :(

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48464139

Points: 3

# Comments: 2

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48118727

Points: 465

# Comments: 284

I printed them with OP to remind me any time i’m afraid somebody can criticize my work and that it’s not worth to produce/write/publish.

no matter how good, there will always be people like you here, so no need to worry.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47828282

Points: 4

# Comments: 1

- gemma4-31b normal q8 -> 5.1 tok/s

- gemma4-31b normal q16 -> 3.7 t/s

- gemma4-31b distil q16 -> 3.6 t/s

- gemma4-31b distil q8 -> 5.7 tok/s (!)

- gemma4-26b-a4b ud q8kxl -> 38 t/s (!)

- gemma4-26b-a4b ud q16 -> 12 t/s

- gemma4-26b-a4b cl q8 -> 42 t/s (!)

- gemma4-26b-a4b cl q16 -> 12 t/s

- qwen3.5-35b-a3b-UD@q6_k -> 52 t/s (!)

- qwen3.5-35b-a3b-uncensored-hauhaucs-aggressive@q8_0 -> 34 tok/s (!)

- qwen3.5-35b-a3b-uncensored-hauhaucs-aggressive@bf16 -> 11 tok/s

- qwen3.5-27b-claude-4.6-opus-reasoning-distilled-v2 q8 -> 8 tok/s

- qwen3.5 122B A10B MXFP4 Mo qwen3.5-122b-a10b (q4) -> 11 tok/s

- qwen3.5-122b-a10b-uncensored-hauhaucs-aggressive (q6) -> 10 tok/s

Simon, any ideas?

https://ibb.co/gFvwzf7M

https://ibb.co/dYHRC3y

https://ibb.co/FLc6kggm (tried here temperature 0.7 instead of pure defaults)

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47550631

Points: 6

# Comments: 0

:-O

NB: 1. this conversation was not about google/activities, etc. completely other topic.

2. I do not have app activity enabled

3. Google in many different places try convince users to allow them to have history and data (app activity).

4. I dont know if this is a result of training, or text insertion via API, nevertheless it was directly within paragraph of other text (response) generated by the gemini (sic!)

We, discuss ads by openai, but here is in big black letters, one of the googles dark pattern directly in model response.

BTW: gemini pro 3.1 really nailed this task and provided a lot of useful information.

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47094649

Points: 4

# Comments: 1

I suspect that final(*) UI is much more similar to TUI: being kind of conversational (human <> AI). Current GUIs provided by your bank/etc are much less effective/useful for us, comparing to conversation way: 'show/do me sth which I just need'. Not to mention (lack of) walled garden effect, and attention grabbing not in the user interest (popups, self-promo, nagging). Also if taking into account age factor. Also that we do not have to learn, yet another GUI (teach a new bank to your mom ;). So at least 4 distinct and important advantages for TUI.

My bet: TUI/conversation win (*).

*) there will be some UI where graphical information density is important (air controller?) especially in time critical environments. yet even there I suspect it's more like conversation with dynamic image/report/graph generated on the go. Not the UI per se.

I'm seeing that "great-ai-unlock" is happening. I see in last month a lot of new software being codeveloped with claude/codex/gemini/you-name it.

Before, it was too costly to do sth like the Posture app: here, you would have to know Swift and apple apis to write such tool. Would you be C# (very good) programmer with free weekend, and an idea: no cookie for ya.

These days, due to "great-ai-unlock" your skills can be easily transferred and used to cross platforms boundary and code such useful app in a weekend or so.

Jevons paradox is indeed working (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jevons_paradox).

- You can bring your shell environments / init scripts / aliases with you in a noninvasive way. I.e. you don't have to modify the remote system dotfiles, when you connect through xpipe it will set up any scripts you want to have available automatically

- You can link up your password manager with your SSH client and other connection methods that require passwords

Feel free to write here or refer to any url you recommend.

Thank you, and good luck with your product!

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43221279

Points: 2

# Comments: 1

Comments URL: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43151174

Points: 3

# Comments: 0

quite handy and can further increase security (trading it of course with lack of recovery would you lost all your devices).