<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: readred</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=readred</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2026 05:25:14 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=readred" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by readred in "Feds freaked over Fable 5 after 'fix this code', not jailbreak, say researchers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>that won't be leaked, because then we'd know what vulnerabilties they don't want patched that they are so willing to go as far as fuck over the worlds leading company in the worlds most important industry</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 12:10:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48553982</link><dc:creator>readred</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48553982</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48553982</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by readred in "Feds freaked over Fable 5 after 'fix this code', not jailbreak, say researchers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>its because they're worried about _their_ vulnerabilities being patched with a prompt as simple as 'fix this code'<p>i'd love to see the research paper with the CVE's and 'delibrately planted vulnerabilities', I bet we could infer relatively accurately where some of these things lie</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 12:06:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48553948</link><dc:creator>readred</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48553948</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48553948</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by readred in "Feds freaked over Fable 5 after 'fix this code', not jailbreak, say researchers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Boomers. Frightened their boomer backdoors days are numbered.<p><a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Assistance_for_Law_Enforcement_Act" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Communications_Assistance_for_...</a> 
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salt_Typhoon" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Salt_Typhoon</a>
<a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_chip" rel="nofollow">https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clipper_chip</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2026 11:43:30 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48553692</link><dc:creator>readred</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48553692</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48553692</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by readred in "Good Writing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>keep in mind what he's aiming for, he's not being honest<p>his definition of 'good' at the beginning of his piece, is not what he says. it is not 'right ideas' or 'flow well'<p>what he is really means is 'convincing'. i.e. effective rhetoric<p>not only that, it's rhetoric spoken with a speakerphone aimed at the masses. In that the simple content > complex content.<p>if one were to take the perspective of 'good writing' in that it gave the readers something, rather than take - it demands something of the reader</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sun, 25 May 2025 03:18:46 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44085271</link><dc:creator>readred</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44085271</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44085271</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by readred in "Journalists perceive stories published in local news outlets to be less worthy"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Cover local kitten stories or wine and dine with celebrities?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2020 03:28:03 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24416712</link><dc:creator>readred</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24416712</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24416712</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by readred in "Assange Hearing Day 6"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>thanks</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2020 13:50:34 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24408304</link><dc:creator>readred</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24408304</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24408304</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by readred in "Is Spotify Killing the Top 40?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I thought writing a pop song was 10% talent and 90% marketing?  Written by the same people because they gatekeep those marketing dollars.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2020 12:26:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24407707</link><dc:creator>readred</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24407707</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24407707</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by readred in "Tesla can detect aftermarket hacks designed to defeat EV performance paywalls"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yep, sounds standard.  If other companies could verify aftermarket hacks to void warranty, you can bet they would.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 08 Sep 2020 12:24:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24407694</link><dc:creator>readred</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24407694</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=24407694</guid></item></channel></rss>