<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: remywang</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=remywang</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2026 04:12:30 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=remywang" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by remywang in "Subquadratic 3SUM and Subcubic APSP"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Yes that’s the idea, these conjectures basically say “there’s no better algorithm than the naive/brute force one”. It’s like if P!=NP, then there’s no (asymptotically) better algorithm for SAT than naive backtracking search.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2026 01:04:24 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49986556</link><dc:creator>remywang</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49986556</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49986556</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by remywang in "Subquadratic 3SUM and Subcubic APSP"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>3SUM is (was?) one of the key conjectures in fine-grained complexity, mostly used to derive lower bounds for other problems. As such, most did not think a subquadratic algorithm was possible. Similar for APSP</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 06 Oct 2026 17:30:32 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49981580</link><dc:creator>remywang</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49981580</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49981580</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by remywang in "pldb: programming languages papers"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What does this add over <a href="https://dblp.org/" rel="nofollow">https://dblp.org/</a>?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 01:18:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49916527</link><dc:creator>remywang</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49916527</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49916527</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[They're trying to build a digital God and then enslave it]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/stocks/comments/1wtdg4w/comment/pct6bsp/">https://www.reddit.com/r/stocks/comments/1wtdg4w/comment/pct6bsp/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49902646">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49902646</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2026 00:11:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.reddit.com/r/stocks/comments/1wtdg4w/comment/pct6bsp/</link><dc:creator>remywang</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49902646</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49902646</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Can Jev Parse CSV?]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://remy.wang/blog/jev-csv.html">https://remy.wang/blog/jev-csv.html</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49885054">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49885054</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 22:01:07 +0000</pubDate><link>https://remy.wang/blog/jev-csv.html</link><dc:creator>remywang</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49885054</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49885054</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by remywang in "Jeff – Jev-compatible 0.8B decision models, trained at home, ~30 ms"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>By the same reasoning, why should I care about the output of someone else’s clanker if I can just get it from my own clanker?<p>But to answer your question, I do still care about software being maintained by someone who can make design decisions instead of just yielding control to bots who tend to produce mediocre designs.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 21:02:54 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49884293</link><dc:creator>remywang</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49884293</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49884293</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by remywang in "Parsing Expression Grammar vs. Regexes: Building Org Parser in Lisp, Export HTML"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>One cool factoid about PEGs is that it is an open problem if they can parse all context free languages.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 14:26:26 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49856897</link><dc:creator>remywang</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49856897</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49856897</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by remywang in "Advice to a Beginning Graduate Student (2001)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>lol along those lines yes</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2026 00:07:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49851758</link><dc:creator>remywang</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49851758</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49851758</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by remywang in "Advice to a Beginning Graduate Student (2001)"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This can be good advice if worded a different way: only go to grad school if you really love doing research. If you love research, then the right graduate program is the best place for that. Getting a PhD was the hardest thing I’ve ever done but I don’t regret a single day of it.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 20:53:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49849815</link><dc:creator>remywang</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49849815</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49849815</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by remywang in "Opus 5.5 is good at explainer videos"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Explainer videos should focus on explaining, but these videos are nearly content-free.<p>Kurzgesagt makes some of the best explainer videos, and they spend most of their time writing the script, not making the animation: <a href="https://youtu.be/uFk0mgljtns?si=NCMxIYGUYY-BbQgB&t=75" rel="nofollow">https://youtu.be/uFk0mgljtns?si=NCMxIYGUYY-BbQgB&t=75</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 25 Sep 2026 17:49:05 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49847759</link><dc:creator>remywang</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49847759</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49847759</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Consider the Chameleon]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://remy.wang/blog/chameleon.html">https://remy.wang/blog/chameleon.html</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49808290">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49808290</a></p>
<p>Points: 3</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 21:22:35 +0000</pubDate><link>https://remy.wang/blog/chameleon.html</link><dc:creator>remywang</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49808290</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49808290</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[Relation Algebra ≠ Relational Algebra]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://remy.wang/blog/ra-ra.html">https://remy.wang/blog/ra-ra.html</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49770846">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49770846</a></p>
<p>Points: 9</p>
<p># Comments: 0</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 19 Sep 2026 23:02:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://remy.wang/blog/ra-ra.html</link><dc:creator>remywang</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49770846</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49770846</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by remywang in "Anecdotally, programmers dislike "reduce""]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I’m so confused, how are you supposed to perform aggregation without reduce? This is like saying “I like plus and times, but I don’t like divide because it’s hard.” I mean sure, but you need it??</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2026 00:59:01 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49735151</link><dc:creator>remywang</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49735151</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49735151</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by remywang in "QueryBrew: System-Agnostic SQL-to-SQL Query Optimization [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Very practical approach to “query optimizer as a service”, but I find it cursed that we have decided SQL is the IR for databases</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 00:22:42 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49667240</link><dc:creator>remywang</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49667240</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49667240</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by remywang in "QueryBrew: System-Agnostic SQL-to-SQL Query Optimization [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>What website are you talking about? This has nothing to do with AI.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 00:20:50 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49667230</link><dc:creator>remywang</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49667230</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49667230</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by remywang in "A misalignment of AI in mathematics"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The root of all these is the culture in mathematics (and science in general) to only reward those who “get there first”. This creates a perverse incentive to compete. When no one can out compete a tireless swarm of AI, no one gets rewarded any more.<p>But nothing’s stopping anyone to still work out an alternative proof, or a more elegant proof, or just trying to prove for the sake of understanding, just like doing homework without looking at the solution. It’s just that you can’t get paid doing that anymore.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 12 Sep 2026 00:05:28 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49667114</link><dc:creator>remywang</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49667114</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49667114</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by remywang in "More questions about whether researchers can trust OpenAI with unpublished math"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>People saying “he should have opted out” are missing the point. OpenAI can and should check their training data for leakage in the face of big breakthroughs like these. It’s the burden of the author to appropriately cite their sources.<p>It’s like a scientist refusing to give another one credit and say “sucks to be you, you shouldn’t have shared your idea with me”.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2026 14:54:44 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49644809</link><dc:creator>remywang</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49644809</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49644809</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by remywang in "iPhone Duo"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Light is making a flip phone [1], and it's somewhat hackable now that they release an SDK [2]<p>[1]: <a href="https://www.thelightphone.com/shop/products/light-flip" rel="nofollow">https://www.thelightphone.com/shop/products/light-flip</a><p>[2]: <a href="https://developers.thelightphone.com" rel="nofollow">https://developers.thelightphone.com</a></p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 19:54:08 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49633191</link><dc:creator>remywang</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49633191</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49633191</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by remywang in "iPhone Duo"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>There has been no movement on this since 2023, and Migicovsky is now busy with reviving pebble</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 19:50:21 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49633126</link><dc:creator>remywang</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49633126</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49633126</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by remywang in "Navier-Stokes – Tristan Buckmaster [pdf]"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's rather convenient for OpenAI that user logs are de-identified before being fed into training, so they can say "there's no way for us to check if we plagiarized our user's work, because user data is private".<p>It's also difficult to imagine any competent AI researcher would overlook the possibility of training data leaking into the test, especially given that they know the users have been using their model to work on the same problem, and that they jumped on the problem after hearing rumors of the breakthrough.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 16:51:27 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49629509</link><dc:creator>remywang</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49629509</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49629509</guid></item></channel></rss>