<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: rhet0rica</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=rhet0rica</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Sat, 07 Nov 2026 17:22:27 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=rhet0rica" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rhet0rica in "sshole"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Updates since this was posted:<p>- blue t-shirts and green socks have been added to the default loadout for new hackers, since it's optimal according to AI and costs nothing to the attacker in terms of compute<p>- there are so many ley line "maps" out there that basically any server placement counts as aligned with at least two, so this one's free also</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2026 16:28:37 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50381133</link><dc:creator>rhet0rica</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50381133</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50381133</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rhet0rica in "Show HN: The DNA of DOOM – How code structure survives across 44 ports"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>If you were to make one edit to Claude's output here, I'd recommend rephrasing "of DOOM's shape shows up in Quake, Quake II and Lua" near the top; though it's explained slightly better later on, the wording seems to imply that Lua is derived from the id Tech family tree, which it obviously isn't. An explicit mention that these are negative controls would be good. Maybe rewrite it to "chance resemblance to three unrelated codebases (Quake, Quake II, and Lua)." Personally I find it fascinating that there's a tangible lineage between Keen 1 and Doom 3. (id used the same tile map editor and file format until Doom.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2026 03:34:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50374813</link><dc:creator>rhet0rica</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50374813</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50374813</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rhet0rica in "Quili AI"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>On a related note, many famous famines went from stressful-but-survivable bad harvests to mass casualty events because of mismanagement: the Irish Potato Famine, the Holodomor, the Great Leap Forward...<p>It seems the villain here could be the Chilean government, for prioritizing the tech economy over the people at a time when it matters most.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2026 16:39:11 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50354236</link><dc:creator>rhet0rica</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50354236</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50354236</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rhet0rica in "We ran AI agent swarms in Minecraft and Mindustry"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The article is definitely synthetic. Toward the end there's a "funny bloopers" section, and it describes the GPT team reporting the round duration to 9 decimal places as a "blooper." It was funny when IBM Watson placed an exact figure for its <i>Final Jeopardy</i> bid, but I don't think extreme precision counts as an out-take... Unless you're an LLM, then maybe it does.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2026 09:08:31 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50314337</link><dc:creator>rhet0rica</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50314337</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=50314337</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rhet0rica in "Claude Opus 5.5"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>"Pace yourself" is a semi-common English idiom (rarely conjugated, usually an imperative.) It is a gentle way of telling someone not to run/work/eat too quickly, and is typically said when you are concerned they may hurt themselves due to acting hastily.<p>Without this idiom, "pacing" usually means walking back and forth restlessly, and is intransitive. Had the slogan been, "pacing around the frontier," it would have set a totally different tone, i.e. "patrolling the border." (Occasionally English speakers will make other constructs like "pace the work" (meaning "spread out a large workload over the allotted time instead of rushing through it") that are transitive but these can be understood as variations on "pace yourself" and are somewhat rarer.)<p>The sleight of hand is that "pace yourself" has come to be an admonishment against recklessness, not a commitment to any particular speed (or lack thereof.) Thus Anthropic can always claim they are meeting the goal of "pacing the frontier," provided they keep giving themselves gold stars for safety. The slogan itself is equivocation; Dario can tell the public they're going to slow down, while also telling their investors that they're going to be prudent. With enough mental gymnastics they could even claim speeding <i>up</i> is in the best interests of AI safety, without abandoning the slogan.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2026 17:47:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49805303</link><dc:creator>rhet0rica</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49805303</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49805303</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rhet0rica in "R/DoohickeyCorporation"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>A subreddit devoted to nonsensical gizmos that solve no practical problem.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 20:44:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49732762</link><dc:creator>rhet0rica</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49732762</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49732762</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[R/DoohickeyCorporation]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Article URL: <a href="https://www.reddit.com/r/doohickeycorporation/">https://www.reddit.com/r/doohickeycorporation/</a></p>
<p>Comments URL: <a href="https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49732761">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49732761</a></p>
<p>Points: 2</p>
<p># Comments: 1</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 20:44:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://www.reddit.com/r/doohickeycorporation/</link><dc:creator>rhet0rica</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49732761</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49732761</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rhet0rica in "GPT-6 Astra"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>One that wouldn't mind <i>manually typed page numbers</i> that would have to be adjusted were the document ever updated.<p>They also inexplicably used Windows 95 Paint to draw a rocket ship during the main video demo.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2026 04:53:33 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49653706</link><dc:creator>rhet0rica</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49653706</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49653706</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rhet0rica in "Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Of course it does! Really, though, what it really wants to do is make restaurant reservations. The primary concern of AI researchers has always been, and will always be, making restaurant reservations.<p>Parsing natural language and solving climate change are downstream of making restaurant reservations.<p><i>Universal Paperclips</i> should have been about making restaurant reservations.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 01:26:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49619574</link><dc:creator>rhet0rica</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49619574</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49619574</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rhet0rica in "Muse – Meta’s personal AI agent"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>It's good that you don't have to call it "Muse." That's kind of a weird name for a servant; how exactly is this email-parsing bot inspiring works of art? Perhaps it was re-used from another project.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 09 Sep 2026 01:24:16 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49619557</link><dc:creator>rhet0rica</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49619557</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49619557</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rhet0rica in "Higher Multipoles of the Cow"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Perhaps the conclusions simply weren't mooving.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2026 08:19:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49547325</link><dc:creator>rhet0rica</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49547325</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49547325</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rhet0rica in "Why Target Common Lisp for Code Generation?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I was thinking of the functions as described by the Common Lisp HyperSpec. Reading it makes me cry.<p>It is not unreasonable to call that a 'standard library.' The term 'standard library' is often used to describe built-ins.<p>The age of the CL core functions is a genuine weakness, specifically in terms of performance. No matter how many libraries you download from Quicklisp, they still have to be implemented <i>in something</i>, and if that <i>something</i> is antiquated or clunky, you're essentially asking the compiler to optimize the entire language out of existence to keep up with the state of the art. The same applies to npm, pip, cargo, and all the rest.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 03:29:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294461</link><dc:creator>rhet0rica</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294461</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294461</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rhet0rica in "Why Target Common Lisp for Code Generation?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>That is... honestly an insane reaction. I spent half an hour writing that.<p>I'm sorry you're scared by em-dashes. They were cool when I was young, alright?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2026 03:17:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294421</link><dc:creator>rhet0rica</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294421</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49294421</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rhet0rica in "Why Target Common Lisp for Code Generation?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This is an inevitable result of small dataset size. As recently as the start of this year, flagship models struggled with Objective-C unless the target was Apple's latest API. (This is per GNUstep lead dev Gregory Casamento, who has every reason to be an expert in these things.)</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 13 Aug 2026 00:41:51 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49280466</link><dc:creator>rhet0rica</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49280466</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49280466</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rhet0rica in "Stolen Buttons"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The "when" isn't a mystery or gradual in the slightest—we have concrete dates.<p>The death of the button occurred on October 21, 2010, when Microsoft released Windows Phone 7 to the international market, beginning the Metro UI era.<p>Apple wouldn't catch up until September 17, 2014, when they unveiled iOS 7, ditching Steve Jobs's beloved skeuomorphism in favor of Jony Ive's signature flat style.<p>Google followed up on November 12, 2014, with Android 5.0 Lollipop's introduction of Material Design—arguably the least flat of the three, though it wouldn't stay that way forever.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Sat, 25 Jul 2026 23:38:38 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49052953</link><dc:creator>rhet0rica</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49052953</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=49052953</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rhet0rica in "How to stop Claude from saying load-bearing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I prefer a more tongue-in-cheek theory than a mere preference for the word's shape. Perhaps "load-bearing" is structurally necessary—if it is ablated, the whole model will collapse!</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2026 13:16:20 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934102</link><dc:creator>rhet0rica</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934102</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48934102</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rhet0rica in "How to stop Claude from saying load-bearing"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The road to hell was paved lovingly, foolishly, naïvely, arrogantly, optimistically... load-bearingly?</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2026 17:54:59 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48910615</link><dc:creator>rhet0rica</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48910615</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48910615</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rhet0rica in "GPT‑Live"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>Encoded in its design are the biases of its designers. It acts like a nervous twenty-something from San Francisco.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 11:21:06 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48844088</link><dc:creator>rhet0rica</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48844088</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48844088</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rhet0rica in "You need a webring"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>The two key interpretations are as follows:<p>1. It follows that all of human authorship is pointless since search engines now actively bury content and impede access to written documents. Long Live The New Flesh.<p>2. Webrings are obviously an artifact of people who hate AI slop and yearn for the simpler days of the older Web, before search engines were effective. Therefore the remark about generated summaries is powerfully sarcastic, as the twain shall never meet. Moreover, Google is no longer fit for purpose, so webrings are an apposite solution to the empty niche of trustworthy discovery mechanisms. Eat The Rich.<p>Which one the author actually meant depends entirely on their literacy regarding the web revival movement.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2026 23:04:55 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48838549</link><dc:creator>rhet0rica</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48838549</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48838549</guid></item><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rhet0rica in "You need a webring"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>This comment is such an elegant Rorschach test. Bravo.</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2026 00:16:22 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48799322</link><dc:creator>rhet0rica</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48799322</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=48799322</guid></item></channel></rss>