<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Hacker News: rhlannx</title><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/user?id=rhlannx</link><description>Hacker News RSS</description><docs>https://hnrss.org/</docs><generator>hnrss v2.1.1</generator><lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Apr 2026 09:43:59 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://hnrss.org/user?id=rhlannx" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"></atom:link><item><title><![CDATA[New comment by rhlannx in "Sam Altman may control our future – can he be trusted?"]]></title><description><![CDATA[
<p>I have the feeling that if you write an article in that style, the subject of the story becomes the hero even if you insert a couple of negatives. In the same manner that Michael Corleone becomes the hero of The Godfather.<p>I'm not pleased with the headline and the general framing that AI works. The plagiarism and IP theft aspects are entirely omitted. The widespread disillusion with AI is omitted.<p>On the positive side, the Kushner ad Abu Dhabi involvements (and threats from Kushner) deserve a wider audience.<p>My personal opinion is that "who should control AI" is the wrong question. In the current state, it is an IP laundering device and I wonder why publications fall silent on this. For example, the NYT has abandoned their crown witness Suchir Balaji who literally perished for his convictions (murder or not).</p>
]]></description><pubDate>Mon, 06 Apr 2026 22:39:19 +0000</pubDate><link>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47668294</link><dc:creator>rhlannx</dc:creator><comments>https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47668294</comments><guid isPermaLink="false">https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=47668294</guid></item></channel></rss>